I really hope it can be connected to the Mac to create some kind of huge distraction free workspace. That would be more then epic!
Possible, but I like many are not paying purely for the technology but what we can do with the device. Brilliant technology you can't do anything with is still useless or at least not worth paying $1,000 or more for it.The microLED displays alone might cost Apple near $1,000, not to mention the pancake lenses, M-like chip, carbon-fiber/aluminum and all the cameras and LiDaR sensors. You're simply not being targeted as a potential buyer of the headset.
I guess my question for your and others is… what software do you want? Everyone is saying the software this and the lack of that, but what exactly do you want lol.
Just curious because the majority are saying it’s already DOA.
If I can’t do this I’m not impressed. I want something like this from Apple 👇How can you possibly know that the software is going to lack?? Is this a statement of fact or just wild speculation that everyone else has already said?
Most current VR headsets have room for glasses. But that means they have to be bigger and heavier than headsets that don't need to accommodate glasses. Apple's headset will likely have prescription lens inserts that can be fitted just in front of the normal lenses. There is also at least one VR headset with adjustable diopters, but that won't be adequate for as many people as custom inserts would be.No chance I’ll be buying it, mostly because of cost and it being a “v1” product.
But I have a stupid question: Do these allow for eyeglasses? I can’t imagine it does, since it’s supposed to block out all light. So what do people who need glasses do? Maybe they’ll have prescription screens in the future?
Do you not realise how absurd that sounds when you’re apparently happy with the status quo (everyone walks down the street with their head bent over at 45°)? If nothing else, it could help people with their self induced neck problems.Goggles no, all this ar stuff will be useless until it can be incorporated into glasses that don’t look ridiculous. Or some holographic tech that can beam things in front of us from our phones as we walk down a street.
You lost me at external fanny - I mean battery pack to power the device.
Do you not realise how absurd that sounds when you’re apparently happy with the status quo (everyone walks down the street with their head bent over at 45°)? If nothing else, it could help people with their self induced neck problems.
This is not a problem?
View attachment 2191884
Not saying it’s not possible, however a bunch of people standing around reading newspapers don’t tend walk straight into post or open door, which I’ve seen with people on their phones…nor do they read newspapers while driving, causing accidents like peopld may when they text.I mean…
View attachment 2191888View attachment 2191889
View attachment 2191890
Seems as though this “problem” is nothing new (or problematic) at all.
Agree with v1 comment…these are meant as a first generation product to prime the pump for app development and continued iterations of tech development to make it better and move towards glasses tech. i expect you can either wear glasses underneath or they have settings to adjust for myopia.No chance I’ll be buying it, mostly because of cost and it being a “v1” product.
But I have a stupid question: Do these allow for eyeglasses? I can’t imagine it does, since it’s supposed to block out all light. So what do people who need glasses do? Maybe they’ll have prescription screens in the future?
People said the same thing about iPad.This does not provide any solution to any problem. It does not give you any extra power or facilitation.
Yes, it’s a rumor but it sounds plausible. If the VR headset is battery powered you don’t want that weight on the headset. I’ve used a headset with an aftermarket battery. This was not an issue for me. Too bad I relied on WiFi with my VIVE pro and WiFi was always terrible. Ultimately I preferred the cord.That's a rumor.
Do you not realise how absurd that sounds when you’re apparently happy with the status quo (everyone walks down the street with their head bent over at 45°)? If nothing else, it could help people with their self induced neck problems.
This is not a problem?
View attachment 2191884
That headset will need to integrate with a particular kind of “light”.First one to come out with realistic AI VR porn headset wins. That is the reality.
Re-read and nope, because... the point I disagree with is where you mentioned that it would be useless unless made into glasses. As far as what the AR/VR Goggles look like? Well, we don't know yet, so I can't comment until I see something better than an "artist impression". Personally, I don't care if a person is walking around wearing goggles, glasses, or anything else tbh. The world changes and I don't judge what people look like. 7 billion people on this earth and everyone has their own story.Hello friendo, it appears for some reason you completely mis-understood my post as what I was envisioning would actually solve that problem. Re-read my post and get back to me after you’ve done so and edited yours.
If we weren’t all in a peaceful state right now we’d be slapping our foreheads.
Not saying it’s not possible, however a bunch of people standing around reading newspapers don’t tend walk straight into post or open door, which I’ve seen with people on their phones…nor do they read newspapers while driving, causing accidents like peopld may when they text.
I mean…
View attachment 2191888View attachment 2191889
View attachment 2191890
Seems as though this “problem” is nothing new (or problematic) at all.