Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

Are they any Radeon Pro 460 benchmarks out yet?

drvelocity

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 20, 2008
112
77
It seems like most of the reviews so far are using machines with the 450 or 455, has anyone seen any good data on the 460?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BenRacicot

kevinkyoo

macrumors 6502a
Feb 5, 2016
618
1,946
Thr desktop version is out. See how AMD handles desktop cards to mobile, then apply that to the 460. This is because unlike NVIDIA, which basically put desktop GPU's in their laptops, AMD still has yet to follow suit
 
Comment

yillbs

macrumors 6502
Oct 2, 2015
381
157
Texas
It seems like most of the reviews so far are using machines with the 450 or 455, has anyone seen any good data on the 460?

The 460 is going to be somewhere around the 965M-970M on Invidia. The 965M was basically the lowest, of the lowest in regards to performance cards. It'll hold it's own, but it's nothing magical in any way, shape or form.
 
Comment

neteng101

macrumors 65816
Jan 7, 2009
1,147
163
The 460 is going to be somewhere around the 965M-970M on Invidia.

Highly doubt it - the 965M even though a generation old is way stronger than the weakling AMD mobile offerings and the typical power effecient chips that Apple picks from. I'd say you'd be lucky to get maybe 75-80% of the 965M performance. The 965M is comparable to the desktop RX 460 so the mobile version is going to fall short.
 
Comment

yillbs

macrumors 6502
Oct 2, 2015
381
157
Texas
Highly doubt it - the 965M even though a generation old is way stronger than the weakling AMD mobile offerings and the typical power effecient chips that Apple picks from. I'd say you'd be lucky to get maybe 75-80% of the 965M performance. The 965M is comparable to the desktop RX 460 so the mobile version is going to fall short.

Wow really? I was being conservative stating the 965 lol... that's going to suck for a lot of MacBook Pro owners!
 
Comment

fokmik

Suspended
Oct 28, 2016
4,909
4,683
USA
the 460 will be the same as 960M i think, still impressive since it has same power but at a low temperatures
 
Comment

Winter Charm

macrumors 6502a
Jul 31, 2008
804
270
Highly doubt it - the 965M even though a generation old is way stronger than the weakling AMD mobile offerings and the typical power effecient chips that Apple picks from. I'd say you'd be lucky to get maybe 75-80% of the 965M performance. The 965M is comparable to the desktop RX 460 so the mobile version is going to fall short.

Radeon Pro 455 already has a higher Cinebench Score than the 965m

SOURCE: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5cvzrq/first_radeon_pro_455_cinebench_numbers/
[doublepost=1479143320][/doublepost]
Wow really? I was being conservative stating the 965 lol... that's going to suck for a lot of MacBook Pro owners!

He's wrong. Radeon Pro 455 is scoring higher than the 965m in Cinebench. https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5cvzrq/first_radeon_pro_455_cinebench_numbers/
[doublepost=1479143372][/doublepost]
tFLOP-wise the Radeon 460 is on-par with nVidias' 965

You cannot compare Tflops across various GPU Lines and especially not across AMD and Nvidia
 
Comment

fs454

macrumors 68000
Dec 7, 2007
1,709
1,293
Los Angeles / Boston
For some reason it kept forcing 1680x1050 even after I selected 1920x1080 multiple times. Also, am I supposed to be keeping the settings default like quality etc? This is valley on the 460 despite being at 1680x1050. I'll try again in a sec, going to LuxMark next.
[doublepost=1479145005][/doublepost]LuxMark result 6023 on GPUs only (both the Intel and the Pro 460 were checked off, CPU was not checked)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 9.27.41 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 9.27.41 AM.png
    469.5 KB · Views: 1,762
  • Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 9.35.42 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 9.35.42 AM.png
    374 KB · Views: 1,325
Comment

viljamip

macrumors regular
Jan 22, 2016
118
79
Can you test Cinebench as well so we can compare it to the 455 scores on Reddit?
 
Comment

fs454

macrumors 68000
Dec 7, 2007
1,709
1,293
Los Angeles / Boston

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 9.41.58 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 9.41.58 AM.png
    169.5 KB · Views: 1,348
Comment

theitsage

Suspended
Aug 28, 2005
795
860
@fs454 Thank you! The retina screen must have force-scaled to 1680x1050. You can select Custom Preset and change Quality to Ultra, Anti-aliasing to x8, and specify the resolution to 1680x1050. Same thing with Heaven with the addition of Tessellation to Extreme.

Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 11.44.03.png
Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 11.47.23.png


This is Luxmark result of a desktop RX 460 for comparison.

mac-pro-rx-460-luxmark-score.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Xombie11
Comment

leman

macrumors G5
Oct 14, 2008
12,309
7,329
OS X, no way I could get Windows installed this quickly - it's 9am here on the west coast. This is a factory fresh 15" TB BTO model.

Then we don't know :) The driver is a big unknown. With OS X score of 85.44fps, the Windows score could be well over 100.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patcell
Comment

koyoot

macrumors 603
Jun 5, 2012
5,751
1,771
So in the end it is on par with GTX 965M, if we take out the difference in performance between macOS and Windows.

What I would be interested in seeing is the benchmarks for Heroes of the Storm and Overwatch Ultra Settings in 1080p. That would help us to compare it RX 460(desktop).
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.