Are they any Radeon Pro 460 benchmarks out yet?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by drvelocity, Nov 14, 2016.

  1. drvelocity macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    #1
    It seems like most of the reviews so far are using machines with the 450 or 455, has anyone seen any good data on the 460?
     
  2. kevinkyoo macrumors 6502a

    kevinkyoo

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    #2
    Thr desktop version is out. See how AMD handles desktop cards to mobile, then apply that to the 460. This is because unlike NVIDIA, which basically put desktop GPU's in their laptops, AMD still has yet to follow suit
     
  3. yillbs macrumors 6502

    yillbs

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Location:
    Texas
    #3
    The 460 is going to be somewhere around the 965M-970M on Invidia. The 965M was basically the lowest, of the lowest in regards to performance cards. It'll hold it's own, but it's nothing magical in any way, shape or form.
     
  4. shadow82x macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    #4
    I just received mine today with the 460, what kind of benchmarks do you want?
     
  5. fs454 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles / Boston
    #5
    I'm walking out of UPS with mine too right now. Let us know what you want to see.
     
  6. LiemTa macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2014
    #6
    Geekbench
     
  7. theitsage macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    #7
    Please run Unigine Valley & Heaven at 1920x1080 full screen for OpenGL and Luxmark for OpenCL performance.
     
  8. fs454 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles / Boston
    #8
    And we're in. I'll get to these asap as soon as I'm out of the car.
     
  9. neteng101 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    #9
    Highly doubt it - the 965M even though a generation old is way stronger than the weakling AMD mobile offerings and the typical power effecient chips that Apple picks from. I'd say you'd be lucky to get maybe 75-80% of the 965M performance. The 965M is comparable to the desktop RX 460 so the mobile version is going to fall short.
     
  10. auero macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    #10
    I wouldn't recommend posting your serial number online.
     
  11. yillbs macrumors 6502

    yillbs

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Location:
    Texas
    #11
    Wow really? I was being conservative stating the 965 lol... that's going to suck for a lot of MacBook Pro owners!
     
  12. fokmik macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    Location:
    USA
    #12
    the 460 will be the same as 960M i think, still impressive since it has same power but at a low temperatures
     
  13. AhmedY macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2016
    Location:
    Cryptoland
    #13
    tFLOP-wise the Radeon 460 is on-par with nVidias' 965
     
  14. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
  15. Winter Charm macrumors 6502a

    Winter Charm

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    #15
    Radeon Pro 455 already has a higher Cinebench Score than the 965m

    SOURCE: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5cvzrq/first_radeon_pro_455_cinebench_numbers/
    --- Post Merged, Nov 14, 2016 ---
    He's wrong. Radeon Pro 455 is scoring higher than the 965m in Cinebench. https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5cvzrq/first_radeon_pro_455_cinebench_numbers/
    --- Post Merged, Nov 14, 2016 ---
    You cannot compare Tflops across various GPU Lines and especially not across AMD and Nvidia
     
  16. viljamip, Nov 14, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2016

    viljamip macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2016
  17. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #17
    The 965M scores over 90 in Cinebench R15: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-965M.134120.0.html

    And Cinebench is not necessarily very reliable benchmark.

    All in all, I bet that the 455 will be slightly faster than the 950M and 460 slightly faster than 960M.
     
  18. fs454 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles / Boston
    #18
    For some reason it kept forcing 1680x1050 even after I selected 1920x1080 multiple times. Also, am I supposed to be keeping the settings default like quality etc? This is valley on the 460 despite being at 1680x1050. I'll try again in a sec, going to LuxMark next.
    --- Post Merged, Nov 14, 2016 ---
    LuxMark result 6023 on GPUs only (both the Intel and the Pro 460 were checked off, CPU was not checked)
     

    Attached Files:

  19. viljamip macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2016
    #19
    Can you test Cinebench as well so we can compare it to the 455 scores on Reddit?
     
  20. fs454 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles / Boston
    #20

    Just got 85.44fps in Cinebench R15 OpenGL. So performance sits below the 965m?
     

    Attached Files:

  21. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #21
    Are you testing under Windows or OS X?
     
  22. fs454 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles / Boston
    #22

    OS X, no way I could get Windows installed this quickly - it's 9am here on the west coast. This is a factory fresh 15" TB BTO model.
     
  23. theitsage, Nov 14, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2016

    theitsage macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    #23
    @fs454 Thank you! The retina screen must have force-scaled to 1680x1050. You can select Custom Preset and change Quality to Ultra, Anti-aliasing to x8, and specify the resolution to 1680x1050. Same thing with Heaven with the addition of Tessellation to Extreme.

    Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 11.44.03.png Screen Shot 2016-11-14 at 11.47.23.png

    This is Luxmark result of a desktop RX 460 for comparison.

    mac-pro-rx-460-luxmark-score.png
     
  24. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #24
    Then we don't know :) The driver is a big unknown. With OS X score of 85.44fps, the Windows score could be well over 100.
     
  25. koyoot macrumors 601

    koyoot

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2012
    #25
    So in the end it is on par with GTX 965M, if we take out the difference in performance between macOS and Windows.

    What I would be interested in seeing is the benchmarks for Heroes of the Storm and Overwatch Ultra Settings in 1080p. That would help us to compare it RX 460(desktop).
     

Share This Page