What exactly disappoints you so much? That a trillion plus dollar company (Apple) will have more difficult time exerting rent on digital goods and services they had absolutely nothing to do with creating? Don’t worry, Apple will be OK, and so will you.
I think Apple went with 30% for the App Store all those years ago because they needed to get
something from the developers and a nice simple flat rate is easy. And 30% was the same cut that the iTunes Store had before the App Store.
Apple could have charged literal rent and said "To be in the App Store developers must pay $50,000 a month"
Or Apple could charge a penny for every millisecond the server is actively transferring files or accessing an account.
But the flat rate is easier.
Is the 30% for Apple too high? And is the 70% for the developer too low?
Hell... when the App Store first opened... developers were thrilled!!! The 70% was WAY more than they made in the old days of software distribution. And it's all digital... no printing boxes and shipping DVDs. And it's a worldwide audience... and Apple handles all the currency conversions and taxes.
I see what you're saying though... people are buying digital goods that might not even come from Apple's servers. So why does Apple deserve a 30% cut?
Well... Apple was just using the old 30% rule from the early days of the App Store and the iTunes Store.
I guess the rules need to be updated. I think it has begun.
Perhaps Apple needs to rethink then entire process... and clearly define the following:
Apple's Role
The App Store's Role
The Developer's Role
The User's Role
etc
I just want everyone to be happy. There's all this talk of Apple being greedy... developers are upset that they're losing money to Apple... consumers are unhappy that apps cost too much...
There's gotta be a way where everyone is happy.