Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They've had less than two years since the March 2020 Report and Order assigning C-band to 5G. Not even "years" let alone "years and years".

Please link to the Japanese regulations on the 3.7-3.98GHz band around airports.

200MHz at 4GHz is not a "large guard band". The radar being used were designed when the only thing in these bands were transmissions from satellites. Now they need to contend with terrestrial broadcasts near runways.

The FAA, airlines, and manufacturers did test altimeters and have repeatedly said this will be a problem. T-Mobile disagreed. The FCC decided to listen to T-Mobile.
T-Mobile uses the 600MHz band as their 5G UW band. It doesn't effect the airlines but does affect Verizon's ONTs video band with cell towers close to outdoor installations. Makes the video feed unwatchable in the 550-700MHz with MER in the 35-40dB range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NMBob and kalafalas
Personally, I didn't really need faster 5G on my iPhone. Certainly not if it is going to involve aircraft dropping from the sky due to incorrect radio altimeter readings. Heck, I'd just settle for my voice calls not endlessly dropping out and disconnecting. No matter how advanced each generation of iPhone gets, the quality of voice calling seems to be the killer app they cannot ace. And a facet of the experience that makes me long for the quality of the twisted copper landlines of old.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jkmoses
well... my line has the most costly plan, my wife and kids... not so much haha. So i should be good
thanks so much!

I have the premium plan too on a 13 PM mostly because I get Apple Music, Hulu, and Disney+ for free with it along with a first responder discount, it’s about a wash if not saving a few bucks rather than laying out for these subscriptions, which we do use.

With the exception of a few places along the highway today for a fleeting moment, my area has no C band coverage. Neither work or home.

More often than not, VZW and VZW have disappointed me when it comes to deployments. According to The Verge, VZW has stated that todays deployment is complete, so if you’re not getting it now, it’s not coming tomorrow morning either. We went through the same thing with the Fios deployment.

And I’m not in the sticks. I’m unwinding after work watching Acela trains go up and down the NE Corridor about 1/2 mile from I-95. So I guess a lot of people will end up disappointed today…
 
I agree with this but this post has good information.

@Bryan Bowler

This is great info. Other details most people seem to be overlooking (or not aware of):
  • Antenna's in the U.S., generally speaking, are ramped up and putting out more power than many other countries
  • Antenna's in the U.S., again generally speaking, are in the vertical position, rather than tilted or even pointing downward or horizontal
So while yes, the spectrum in question has safeguards, and yes the FAA has known this was coming, the concerns can't be dismissed just because "other countries are doing it without issue!".

The FAA gains nothing by pushing back on this so hard. Airlines might - as they could request funds for upgrades. But the FAA has no incentive other than public safety (or government power I guess?) to push so hard on this.
 
T-Mobile uses the 600MHz band as their 5G UW band. It doesn't effect the airlines but does affect Verizon's ONTs video band with cell towers close to outdoor installations. Makes the video feed unwatchable in the 550-700MHz with MER in the 35-40dB range.
Is that true? Strong enough to overwhelm a fiber interface? I can’t find a reference to it. Still, an MER of 35-40dB doesn’t seem that bad…. Even 256 QAM only needs just over 30dB, I think?

Not sure why T-Mobile commissioned the study since they didn’t invest much into C-band, but it’s the one the FCC referenced in their decision.
 
Last edited:
The FAA issue is frequently talked about but there are issues for weather reporting too.


Two completely different issues here. The FAA issue is about C-Band, the ~3.4Ghz 5G band that is already in widespread use around the world, but not the USA until now.

The issue with weather satellites concerns mmWave 5G at 24-29 Ghz, which has been used in the USA (and a few other countries) since 2019 or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
Verizon 5G UW running great here in Kansas City and Overland Park KS.

Inside my house about a mile from the nearest tower, getting speeds around 200 mbps down and 5-10 up. Only on two bars too! Can’t wait to see what speeds I get with full signal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoGood@Usernames
Verizon lit up 5G UW all over Phoenix, AZ today... getting a consistent 250-320 Mbps down and 10-13 up. Not bad... and it is even on my street and surprisingly getting a UW signal in my house too. I can't wait till Verizon offers the 5G home internet service at my address. I would ditch Cox cable internet for this at $50-70 per month if it stays unlimited.

What I’m getting in the Chandler area.
 

Attachments

  • 764C2A28-B8C7-4792-A873-0B10DA1A92E4.jpeg
    764C2A28-B8C7-4792-A873-0B10DA1A92E4.jpeg
    314.5 KB · Views: 79
Same in Austin. Wondering if "select parts of these cities" they really mean they installed c-band on a couple towers in the middle of downtown and nowhere else. I really thought "select parts" would mean the city itself but not yet all the metro suburbs, etc. But i'm smack in the middle of the city (not downtown though) and have no c-band showing.
I have Verizon and live north Austin (Domain), I’m still on 5G and sometimes even LTE. ??‍♂️
 
I actually drove through a 5G+ area on January 3 in Boynton Beach, FL. Very odd placement IMO. Just happened to notice the cellular indicator. It's no joke. Here's the location incase anyone lives nearby and wants to check it out.
5G+ 2.jpg

and the speed results
5G+ 1.png
 
All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.

It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
Who told you VZW is not supporting MVNO's? I'm using Xfinity Mobile and while I'm not seeing 5G UW today I have seen it in downtown SLC on the mmWave part of VZW's network.
 
Verizon 5G UW running great here in Kansas City and Overland Park KS.

Inside my house about a mile from the nearest tower, getting speeds around 200 mbps down and 5-10 up. Only on two bars too! Can’t wait to see what speeds I get with full signal.
UPDATE:
Ran a speed test outside about 1/4 mile away from the tower. Blown away by the results. This is incredible.
 

Attachments

  • 8205B458-31D1-4169-878B-F0741C09CEE5.jpeg
    8205B458-31D1-4169-878B-F0741C09CEE5.jpeg
    90.3 KB · Views: 103
  • Like
Reactions: NoGood@Usernames
Umm. My LTE speeds are 42.3 down and my 5G UW speeds are 42.2 down.

Hmmmm

My 5G mmWave speeds exceed 1Gb, tho.
 
The FAA issue is frequently talked about but there are issues for weather reporting too.

I'm a meteorologist and I believe these concerns are overblown.
 
If someone is getting this working, can you please post the speeds you are seeing? Thanks.
 
Verizon lit up 5G UW all over Phoenix, AZ today... getting a consistent 250-320 Mbps down and 10-13 up. Not bad... and it is even on my street and surprisingly getting a UW signal in my house too. I can't wait till Verizon offers the 5G home internet service at my address. I would ditch Cox cable internet for this at $50-70 per month if it stays unlimited.
Yup I’m in Phoenix and I saw UW all over Phoenix, Verizon does keep it promises when they expand coverage and my speeds are amazing !
Those speeds are flying for Verizon in AZ ??. Verizon sucks so bad here. I switched to AT&T a while ago.
switched from att to Verizon, getting UW all over chandler now it’s great and super fast now !
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.