Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
T-Mobile uses the 600MHz band as their 5G UW band. It doesn't effect the airlines but does affect Verizon's ONTs video band with cell towers close to outdoor installations. Makes the video feed unwatchable in the 550-700MHz with MER in the 35-40dB range.
Tmobile uses 600 band for the regular 5g. their Version of Uw is as follows from their website.

  • With Ultra Capacity 5G, you’ll experience a performance boost, a reliable connection in crowded locations, and speeds as fast as Wi-Fi.
  • Look for the newly released
    5G%20UC%20icon%20horizontal.png
    or
    Apple%205G%20UC%20Icon.png
    icon on your iPhone or Android screen to know when you’re in an area with our fastest speeds!
  • Frequencies that can provide UC 5G:
    • Band n41 (2.5 GHz)
    • Band n258 (24 GHz)
    • Band n260 (39 GHz)
    • Band n261 (28 GHz)



T-Mobile uses the 600mhz for their Extended Range systems only.
  • With Extended Range 5G, you’ll receive nationwide coverage, faster speeds than our 4G LTE and a reliable connection indoors and out from the big city to rural areas.
  • Frequencies that can provide XR 5G:
    • Band n71 (600 MHz)
 
you should educate yourself before pointing fingers ... here is a good starting point: #113
Except that graphic is wrong. There is no carrier spectrum agreed to deployed above 3.8GHz, giving the same/more buffer between the carrier spectrum and the 4.2GHz band (that altimeters use) vs. what is already deemed as safe in Europe.
 
All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.

It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
US Mobile is one of those, and I got an email this morning that it was turned on for us.
 
All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.

It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
Only the basic entry level Verizon plan doesn’t support it. The rest do. So not truly only premium plans.
 
Except that graphic is wrong. There is no carrier spectrum agreed to deployed above 3.8GHz, giving the same/more buffer between the carrier spectrum and the 4.2GHz band (that altimeters use) vs. what is already deemed as safe in Europe.
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
ATT and VZ are deploying C-Band that supports up to 3.98GHz, in Europe they go up to 3.8GHz. The aviation altimeters operate between 4.2 and 4.4GHz, so that delta between the US 3.98 top is the concern…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Except that graphic is wrong. There is no carrier spectrum agreed to deployed above 3.8GHz, giving the same/more buffer between the carrier spectrum and the 4.2GHz band (that altimeters use) vs. what is already deemed as safe in Europe.

3. Amend § 1.9005 by removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (kk); removing the period at the end of paragraph (ll) and adding “; and” in its place; and adding paragraph (mm).

The addition reads as follows:

§ 1.9005 Included services.
*****
(mm) The 3.7 GHz Service in the 3.7-3.98 GHz band.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
ATT and VZ are deploying C-Band that supports up to 3.98GHz, in Europe they go up to 3.8GHz. The aviation altimeters operate between 4.2 and 4.4GHz, so that delta between the US 3.98 top is the concern…
From what I understand, in Europe/Asia the 5G towers are angled down, have reduced power (near airports), and have slightly different frequencies. I am surprised it was allowed to be put online without all diligence (now that airlines are modifying and canceling flights).
 
I an confirm sightings of the elusive Verizon Wireless 5Guw "Yeti" for the first time in Delaware today along two separate parts of the Interstate highway. One up near the PA line, and one off the approach to the the DE Memorial Bridge. The area (Northern Delaware) I believe is part of the Philadelphia regional market.

5Guw wasn't live at my house when I left for work this morning (Philly 'Burbs) but I'm guessing this isn't like turning on a light switch, it takes time to filter down. Like the virus in "Independence Day"....

I last saw it when I was leaving Philly, near I’m assuming their stadium. I only saw it for a few seconds.
 
Too bad with Verizon you need a more expensive data plan to take advantage of it. Although launching the C Band should free up bandwidth with their DSS 5G
 
All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.

It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
US Mobile offers it.

 
I have Verizon and live north Austin (Domain), I’m still on 5G and sometimes even LTE. ??‍♂️
I live in the North Austin domain as well with ATT, I only get one bar coverage, and call drops a lot.
FCC doesn't do any validation of coverage claims
 
I was under the impression that I’ve been in an area that has active 5G service through AT&T (Route 95 corridor in Rhode Island). But I’ve never seen any significant speeds with my iPhone 12 on a 5G plan. So has it not been available in this area for the last year? Their map showed that it has been.
 
I live in downtown Dallas and finally toggled the 5G On setting and I’ve been getting repeated dropped calls in some areas. I had used 5G Auto and then went back to only LTE due to negligible speeds and super spotty 5G UW. I’ve restarted multiple times and will see if it levels out over time
 
I live in the North Austin domain as well with ATT, I only get one bar coverage, and call drops a lot.
FCC doesn't do any validation of coverage claims
100 percent agree. I can can’t get no service in yard house or much of the domain for that matter. Glad I’m not the only one paying a premium for no service. I’m hoping it improves.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Benjamin Nabulsi
US Mobile is one of those, and I got an email this morning that it was turned on for us.

How has US Mobile been for you? I’ve been super tempted to try them out as a cheaper alternative (we’re on Verizon right now), especially now that C-Band is being turned on, which I would assume will help with congestion. I’m just hesitant because the last time I tried a Verizon MVNO, it was useless during times of high congestion (I live in a large metro area).
 
That's outdated. The new 'cap' the carriers + FCC have agreed to is now 3.8GHz.
No, the first phase of the rollout is up to 3.8GHz. Look at the letter you linked to-- "400 megahertz from the C-Band frequencies (3.7-3.8 MHz) that AT&T and Verizon will begin using in 2022 and at least 220 megahertz from any C-Band frequency authorized for use in the future." The phased roll out is to give the satcom companies time to repack their transmissions into the new spectrum. This is outlined in the original Report and Order.

For all their bluster about how other countries have done this, their solution is "for six months, until July 5, 2022, we will adopt the same C-Band radio exclusion zones that are already in use in France, with slight adaptation to reflect the modest technical differences in how C-band is being deployed in the two countries." In other words, C-band was deployed in France at lower power and with airport exclusion zones.

Also, France has only allocated 3.4 to 3.8GHz to C-band communications:
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.