Tmobile uses 600 band for the regular 5g. their Version of Uw is as follows from their website.T-Mobile uses the 600MHz band as their 5G UW band. It doesn't effect the airlines but does affect Verizon's ONTs video band with cell towers close to outdoor installations. Makes the video feed unwatchable in the 550-700MHz with MER in the 35-40dB range.
Except that graphic is wrong. There is no carrier spectrum agreed to deployed above 3.8GHz, giving the same/more buffer between the carrier spectrum and the 4.2GHz band (that altimeters use) vs. what is already deemed as safe in Europe.you should educate yourself before pointing fingers ... here is a good starting point: #113
US Mobile is one of those, and I got an email this morning that it was turned on for us.All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.
It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
Only the basic entry level Verizon plan doesn’t support it. The rest do. So not truly only premium plans.All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.
It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
I have no idea what you are trying to say.Except that graphic is wrong. There is no carrier spectrum agreed to deployed above 3.8GHz, giving the same/more buffer between the carrier spectrum and the 4.2GHz band (that altimeters use) vs. what is already deemed as safe in Europe.
Except that graphic is wrong. There is no carrier spectrum agreed to deployed above 3.8GHz, giving the same/more buffer between the carrier spectrum and the 4.2GHz band (that altimeters use) vs. what is already deemed as safe in Europe.
3. Amend § 1.9005 by removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (kk); removing the period at the end of paragraph (ll) and adding “; and” in its place; and adding paragraph (mm).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 1.9005 Included services.
*****
(mm) The 3.7 GHz Service in the 3.7-3.98 GHz band.
Shhhh 5G is the futureUmm. My LTE speeds are 42.3 down and my 5G UW speeds are 42.2 down.
Hmmmm
My 5G mmWave speeds exceed 1Gb, tho.
From what I understand, in Europe/Asia the 5G towers are angled down, have reduced power (near airports), and have slightly different frequencies. I am surprised it was allowed to be put online without all diligence (now that airlines are modifying and canceling flights).I have no idea what you are trying to say.
ATT and VZ are deploying C-Band that supports up to 3.98GHz, in Europe they go up to 3.8GHz. The aviation altimeters operate between 4.2 and 4.4GHz, so that delta between the US 3.98 top is the concern…
I an confirm sightings of the elusive Verizon Wireless 5Guw "Yeti" for the first time in Delaware today along two separate parts of the Interstate highway. One up near the PA line, and one off the approach to the the DE Memorial Bridge. The area (Northern Delaware) I believe is part of the Philadelphia regional market.
5Guw wasn't live at my house when I left for work this morning (Philly 'Burbs) but I'm guessing this isn't like turning on a light switch, it takes time to filter down. Like the virus in "Independence Day"....
US Mobile offers it.All the 12 models support mm wave and C band. It's my understanding that VZW is not supporting MVNO's, so if you have one of those "runs on Verizon's network" services, you're probably not going to get it. You also have to be on the right plan with VZW.
It's a premium service right now, and probably in the foreseeable future.
I live in the North Austin domain as well with ATT, I only get one bar coverage, and call drops a lot.I have Verizon and live north Austin (Domain), I’m still on 5G and sometimes even LTE. ??♂️
The same applies to the FCC.the FAA is so incompetent, it's about time.
That wasn't the point lol. The point was that I am content with 3G speeds.Not for too much longer though.
![]()
Plan Ahead for Phase Out of 3G Cellular Networks and Service
.right { float: right; width: 38%; margin-left: 5px;} .left { float: left; width: 32%; } .bottompwww.fcc.gov
Are you on Ultra Wideband? Your icon only says "5G" (although you are on an Android phone... so I am not familiar with what your particular phone displays for network connections.)What I’m getting in the Chandler area.
They're stopping at 3.8GHz, as agreed to by the FCC, page 2.I have no idea what you are trying to say.
ATT and VZ are deploying C-Band that supports up to 3.98GHz, in Europe they go up to 3.8GHz. The aviation altimeters operate between 4.2 and 4.4GHz, so that delta between the US 3.98 top is the concern…
That's outdated. The new 'cap' the carriers + FCC have agreed to is now 3.8GHz.![]()
FCC Releases C-Band Report & Order
www.tlp.law
100 percent agree. I can can’t get no service in yard house or much of the domain for that matter. Glad I’m not the only one paying a premium for no service. I’m hoping it improves.I live in the North Austin domain as well with ATT, I only get one bar coverage, and call drops a lot.
FCC doesn't do any validation of coverage claims
US Mobile is one of those, and I got an email this morning that it was turned on for us.
No, the first phase of the rollout is up to 3.8GHz. Look at the letter you linked to-- "400 megahertz from the C-Band frequencies (3.7-3.8 MHz) that AT&T and Verizon will begin using in 2022 and at least 220 megahertz from any C-Band frequency authorized for use in the future." The phased roll out is to give the satcom companies time to repack their transmissions into the new spectrum. This is outlined in the original Report and Order.That's outdated. The new 'cap' the carriers + FCC have agreed to is now 3.8GHz.