It's a charge just based on the assumption that you'll use more. I'm pretty sure AT&T has a study somewhere that shows higher averages of data with tethering. I know it sounds wrong, but I get it from the AT&T standpoint. I'd be carrying my MBP to work EVERY DAY if I could use tethering at no extra charge. I guess you could just consider it like a cover charge for entering the VIP room.
I'm not saying it's 100 percent right for the customers, but I think part of it is to keep the non-tethering prices down.
Yeah, shocking, I know. It's the same rate as outgoing. So basically we're paying double (1 for sending, 1 for receiving). If you have an allocated number of texts, it will be subtracted too for receiving.
AT&T would not be changing this unless it could make them MORE money. Seriously, I doubt their figures of 98% use < 2GB of data. Keep in mind usage is both sending and receiving.
My iphone indicates I've sent 211MB and received 1.7GB.
No thank you, I'll keep my unlimited plan for as long as I can.
Light users will undoubtedly benefit more than heavy data users.
Have you reset that recently? It's more than likely your phone's lifetime usage, not a month.
Use the at&t data usage reporting, not the iPhone's unless you reset it.
Then here's how it should be:
$15/month: 200MB
$25/month: 2GB
$45/month: 4GB (including tethering)
screwed.
The bandwidth "hogs" today is the normal users tomorrow. Do you want people to stuck only doing text emails on their smartphones forever? Consider watching youtube when it was started. You would be considered as bandwidth "hogs," yet today watching hulu,netflix streaming, etc is considered normal usage.This is exactly what they wanted to accomplish. The bandwidth hogs will pay more, as they should.
That will include Wi-Fi data too I believe.
My iphone indicates I've sent 211MB and received 1.7GB.
No thank you, I'll keep my unlimited plan for as long as I can.
So you've used 1.9GB of combined WiFi and 3G since you bought your phone (which presumably wasn't this month, considering you're on this site), and think a 2GB monthly cap on 3G is going to screw you?
So you've used 1.9GB of combined WiFi and 3G since you bought your phone (which presumably wasn't this month, considering you're on this site), and think a 2GB monthly cap on 3G is going to screw you?
AT&T would not be changing this unless it could make them MORE money. Seriously, I doubt their figures of 98% use < 2GB of data. Keep in mind usage is both sending and receiving.
My iphone indicates I've sent 211MB and received 1.7GB.
No thank you, I'll keep my unlimited plan for as long as I can.
The bandwidth "hogs" today is the normal users tomorrow. Do you want people to stuck only doing text emails on their smartphones forever?
I don't see ATT's angle on this they are going to lose more money from people going from $30/mo to $15/mo than they are ever going to make up from tethering/overages.
I suppose it will attract more customers since the base monthly plan will be cheaper.
Oh man, you Americans get reemed.
12 USD unlimited 3G 2mbit connectivity with tethering here in the Netherlands (with T-Mobile). You want a different provider? Sure 3.6mbit unlimited with tethering for 12 USD a month.
USA! USA! USA!
I will never understand why they're charging $20 just for the ability to tether.
So you're given 2GB to play with for $25 a month regardless of whether or not you want to use tethering. Pay an additional $20 a month, and they'll turn tethering on, but it comes out of the same 2GB you're given to use for when you're not tethering!
If it were $20 for unlimited tethering, that'd be a different story. But because it comes out of the same 2GB quota that's used for day-to-day use, that's ridiculous.