Wow... What i just saw?? So AT&T charge for its 300MBPS $55 PLUS taxes? So my fiber 200/200 in greece is cheaper than americas. (€26 included taxes)
Nice
Nice
Same where I live.LMAO.... this is what is available in my area.... Ill stick with the Cox Gigablast... View attachment 1948776
Wired connections can, and it allows you to have much more available bandwidth to share between all your devices.What's the point of these? No WiFi can transport this kind of data. And who needs this for workstation-at-home work?
Same here. My city has had Fiber coverage for YEARS, however my neighborhood does not. I've been looking for a reason to drop Xfinity for years now, but AT&T's basic internet can't touch Xfinity's speeds ?Same where I live.
your country is a fraction of the size, infrastructure costs are much more in the US due to the shear size of deployments and maintenance needed.Meanwhile in high price Switzerland...
View attachment 1948785
Thats about 70$ per month. And it is just normal ethernet, no XGSPON shenanigans...
WiFi 6... and people/homes can have multiple devices using fiber bandwidth.What's the point of these? No WiFi can transport this kind of data. And who needs this for workstation-at-home work?
Larger country with more customers = more revenue, too. Of course it's easier in smaller, denser countries, but the U.S. is still a disaster for broadband. AT&T is just now rolling out 21st century speeds and they're charging two to three times what they would in an open market.your country is a fraction of the size, infrastructure costs are much more in the US due to the shear size of deployments and maintenance needed.
The only benefit to gamers is that they could download a 70 gigabyte game in 2 minutes instead of 10 minutes.My only concern is, how do you find those 100 gb files to download everyday for home networks? All streaming services are highly optimized. You’d have no issues even at 100 mbps or lower. May be gamers need this? Or small businesses??
Really though? I mean, Sweden is usually touted as broadband-cheap, but 1GBit costs around $60/month. $12 for 10GBit seems unusally cheap.What a difference.
In Europe, I pay $12 per month for 10 Gbps.
The point of these new higher speed plans is so AT&T can eliminate their lower speed plans and then charge us more.I have AT&T's 300 Mbps fiber, downgraded after trying 1 Gbps for a couple of months. My family of couldn't stress the network to a point where we would benefit from 1 Gbps.
That isn't to say others wouldn't benefit, but before spending more money, one should understand what their true needs are. If everyone is on Wi-Fi, you probably can't get much faster than 700 Mbps even with the best Wi-Fi router.
My only concern is, how do you find those 100 gb files to download everyday for home networks? All streaming services are highly optimized. You’d have no issues even at 100 mbps or lower. May be gamers need this? Or small businesses??