Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Edit: Ignore my post, I was thinking about my cell plan

I haven't actually checked, but I have my doubts about "no data limits".

Where I live I have an "Unlimited" plan, which all the providers offer. It's "unlimited", but after [x]GB, they throttle you down to 512kbps.

Just want to say… even on the cell plan, AT&T stopped with the soft cap over a year ago in response to T-Mobile lifting theirs a few months prior. And Verizon then recently stopped theirs too.
 
What's the point of these? No WiFi can transport this kind of data. And who needs this for workstation-at-home work?
This is for larger, shared living spaces. A spot with 5+ family members or roommates all taking classes/working/gaming/streaming from home can easily benefit from 5gb of shared bandwidth, across multiple wireless APs etc.
 
"Who needs this" is a short term question. This is a long term infrastructure issue. Most families probably don't need this /now/ but if the technology is there, content providers, programers, hardware manufacturers, et all, can take advantage of this increased speed and innovate and offer bigger and better. I have 1gig at home. My wife works from home as a corporate accountant with lots of video conferencing. Tons of smart home stuff. 2 kids. 1 gig is just right for us... for now.
 
LMAO.... this is what is available in my area.... Ill stick with the Cox Gigablast... View attachment 1948776


My current AT&T U-verse Internet plan:

1643047366445.png



With my current plan I own the wireless gateway. If I upgrade to a blazingly fast 1.5 or 3.0 Mbps plan, then I also have to pay equipment rental fees ($10/month, not included in the prices shown below):

1643047750774.png
 
  • Wow
Reactions: freedomlinux
Same here. My city has had Fiber coverage for YEARS, however my neighborhood does not. I've been looking for a reason to drop Xfinity for years now, but AT&T's basic internet can't touch Xfinity's speeds ?
Unfortunately they cherry pick the neighborhoods they deploy to. I live in Madison, WI where we've had AT&T fiber for several years. Most people I know do not live in a service area.
You need to put out a large visible ad if you want AT&T fiber in your neighborhood.

 
your country is a fraction of the size, infrastructure costs are much more in the US due to the shear size of deployments and maintenance needed.
Older countries also have a much harder time rolling out infrastructure with trying to get the cables under roads and the permits required. We are past the point where a king can just say "We are building a straight road with a internet line right from the capital to the north city". You have all kinds of weird lines following weird 'natural' roads instead of grid cities with multiple lanes of traffic even and miles of empty cheap land.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JavaMan07
Expensive, but would be cool to be able to stream uncompressed (4K blu-ray quality) movies with the best audio/visuals. As is, I'm barely taking advantage of a single Gigabit.
For uncompressed 24FPS 4K HDR, you’d need 6 Gigabit just the video alone (or half that if you’re using standard 4:2:0 chroma subsampling). Blu-Ray is not uncompressed, it's just less compressed than streaming video. I would like higher quality streaming, though.
 
  • Love
Reactions: tothemoonsands
What's the point of these? No WiFi can transport this kind of data. And who needs this for workstation-at-home work?
WiFi 7 is going to get > 30Gbps total throughput. Not sure what you're talking about.

My current residents has a 1/2.5/10GbE (not 5GbE) capable router and the network is mostly 10GbE with some aggregation for 20GbE.

I have AT&T Small Business Fiber and I just "upgraded" from a 1Gbps/200Mbps plan to 1Gbps symmetrical for a reduction in per/month costs of ~40%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: centauratlas
What's the point of these? No WiFi can transport this kind of data. And who needs this for workstation-at-home work?
It matters for me. I'm a videographer who regularly uploads 50-75gb video files and work from home wasn't possible until I got ATT Gigabit. Our previous top-tier Cox internet had great download speeds but uploading files of that size was impossible. And wifi isn't part of the process. Hard-wired ethernet for this kind of work.
 
I think most people will find that their existing routers/firewalls won't support the throughput.

What could be interesting is if AT&T leveraged their own routers to provide these speeds in the home, but also opened up a publicly accessible wifi MESH network that anyone within range could use. In Tampa, Spectrum is a larger provider that has WiFi hotspots all over the city. If you use their internet service, you have access to their hotspots.
 
Last edited:
It matters for me. I'm a videographer who regularly uploads 50-75gb video files and work from home wasn't possible until I got ATT Gigabit. Our previous top-tier Cox internet had great download speeds but uploading files of that size was impossible. And wifi isn't part of the process. Hard-wired ethernet for this kind of work.
Yeah, a lot of internet plans have horrible upload speeds. 200 mbps Xfinity limits uploads to less than 10 mbps.
 
I've worked from home for 21 1/2 years. I pay around $140 to Cox for 500/30 with no alternatives where we live. I have zero need for 2 - 5Gb but I would be thrilled to pay $110 for 2Gb to get away from Cox who keeps raising prices almost annually.
Were you grandfathered into the 500/30 plan because I have Cox and don't see it in their lineup of packages (it's now 500/10). I wouldn't mind getting that plan (if available) as I have the 300/30 which they don't market anymore.
 
These articles are always a joke at least here in GA what you have is what you have if you are anywhere outside of the the Atlanta perimeter. Xfinity pays big bucks and gives the cities around Atlanta huge discounts to not approve letting anyone else in.

I live on the border of Canton and Woodstock but I'm in Woodstock. Windstream Fiber stops at my neighborhood entrance as the first Woodstock neighborhood. They flat out aren't allowed to build into Woodstock.

I check every six months Verizon AT&T Windstream are completely blocked.

They argue I can get 50mb Windstream DSL. Winstream DSL and ancient and buggy and it's a never-ending war every time I bring up trying to get them to pull fiber in the neighborhood. They suck and are unreliable is always the response because people aren't technical enough to understand that they are completely different technologies and divisions of the company. If I can't even get the neighborhood to understand I'll never get things to change with the Xfinity lockdown.
 
That is FAST and EXPENSIVE…
I do not get ATT where I live, and if I did, I would not subscribe to them. I’ve sworn to myself that I will never ever give ATT a cent of my own money, they sucked back then, and they still suck… so do most internet and cell providers in the US… but I’ve drawn my line with them
 
When I signed up for the 300 Mbps plan, I got it for $45/mo. I just checked right now and it's $60/mo ($55/mo with autopay and paperless billing) for new subscribers.

At some point, the 300 Mbps plan will be eliminated and AT&T will do us a favor and automatically "upgrade" us to their 500 Mbps plan ($70/mo or $65/mo with autopay and paperless billing).
Over the last 2 years, AT&T offered $15/month discount on fiber plans on the first year. It has since been replaced with $200 prepaid gift card. Are you certain your $45/month price isn't set to rise to $60/month after a year?
 
Wow what prices. o_O:eek:

In Italy, with Vodafone, I pay:
  • 17.00 €/month (19.26 $) for the 200/20 Mbit VDSL
  • 9.99 €/month (11.32 $) for the VF mobile SIM (UNLIMITED 5G Internet, unlimited calls and SMS)
The 2.5 Gbit (FTTH) in Italy costs an average of 24.90 €/month (28.22 $). To say that in the USA the prices are really high.
 
It’s all about having enough bandwidth for large groups of people connected to the same network (i.e. businesses with employees)
 
What's the point of these? No WiFi can transport this kind of data. And who needs this for workstation-at-home work?

Wi-Fi 6E can hit 7 gigabit. Normal Wi-Fi 6 can get higher then a gigabit. It could also be used across channels with mesh networking. 4 APs with 4 devices could saturate it.

They are paving the way to streaming high quality lightfield video to our AR headsets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow_Servo
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.