I'd be more surprised if an AT&T exec didn't express a desire to milk his customer base any and every way possible.
Just because something is considered a utility doesn’t mean it is immune from customers putting up with pricing shenanigans. Google Alliant Energy rate increase for some fun reading. At least in the wireless industry there is SOME competition and choice for consumers.
Extremist view is extreme.ATT is greedy no doubt. But who are you to complain at their strategy and decide what is and what isn’t a utility? Did you take the business risk to build out their towers and network infrastructure? The idea that government, stealing money and resources from people and allocating them to disciplines and industries in which they have no expertise whatsoever is the definition of misguided. Private markets are inherently always superior. Always. Government monopolies cannot be efficient.
They can keep it. 4G LTE is more than enough for cell phone usage.
ATT is greedy no doubt. But who are you to complain at their strategy and decide what is and what isn’t a utility? Did you take the business risk to build out their towers and network infrastructure? The idea that government, stealing money and resources from people and allocating them to disciplines and industries in which they have no expertise whatsoever is the definition of misguided. Private markets are inherently always superior. Always. Government monopolies cannot be efficient.
Can't wait for 6G when they start tiering by location, type of smartphone, etc, etc...![]()
It's almost like there is this unofficial agreement amongst the big providers about who get what slice in low density parts of the country.
So we should all have government 5G Internet? Because that would work just great, right?It’s sucks when What should be considered a utility is being treated with “some people will be willing to pay more for the full experience”.
This quote from att shows exactly why this idea that private companies will provide the best experience to the largest number of users for something which is effectively necessary to function in society is incredibly misguided.
ATT is greedy no doubt. But who are you to complain at their strategy and decide what is and what isn’t a utility? Did you take the business risk to build out their towers and network infrastructure? The idea that government, stealing money and resources from people and allocating them to disciplines and industries in which they have no expertise whatsoever is the definition of misguided. Private markets are inherently always superior. Always. Government monopolies cannot be efficient.
ATT is greedy no doubt. But who are you to complain at their strategy and decide what is and what isn’t a utility? Did you take the business risk to build out their towers and network infrastructure? The idea that government, stealing money and resources from people and allocating them to disciplines and industries in which they have no expertise whatsoever is the definition of misguided. Private markets are inherently always superior. Always. Government monopolies cannot be efficient.
5G is a solution in search of a problem...
So we should all have government 5G Internet? Because that would work just great, right?
The free market will work in this instance just like it always does if the government will stay out of it. Let people take their money to different and better companies. Soviet American 5G access isn’t the way to go.
I believe that I will be angry in the future.