Can anyone say lawsuit?
I'm just waiting for the announcement about a class action false advertising (bait and switch) lawsuit and the thousands of cancelled 3G iPad pre-orders.
Not defending or showing any support for this terrible turn of events (from we USERS point of view), but you- and all others slinging "bait & switch" around- might want to look up the definition. True bait & switch is baiting with a product priced almost "too good to be true". The switch is that when you go to buy the product, it is "out of stock" but you can buy this other product instead.
Today, you can still buy an iPad 3G- if you can find one- and get the $30 plan. You can get the "baited" product & plan all the way to June 7. There is no switch waiting for you for either the product or plan between now and then.
The closest one might argue for the switch is the implication that the 3G "use it when you want it" plan will disappear on June 7. However, that's a change of service, which I bet is absolutely laid out in the terms of use agreement with AT&T. Near crooked? Yes. Illegal? Probably not. Bait & Switch? No.
That said, are we really surprised by this? It is AT&T after all. When does AT&T do anything that benefits their users at their expense? Verizon will soon follow with the same kind of deal. Probably the other semi-majors too. When you can count the number of applicable competitors on one hand, there is rarely true competition. Users can't win in such pseudo-monopolies.
I had such high hopes that when the TV spectrum was freed up as part of the switch over to digital TV that players other than AT&T & Verizon would be able to get the spectrum, and thus be new competition. Even Apple & Google appeared to have serious interest. But, in the end... and no surprise... guess who bought up the vast majority of that new spectrum?