You people have no vision. We should now get commercials with her as the shirtless iPhone user.So I guess there will be no more of those annoying att bashing tmobile ads from that chick in the pink dress with the shirtless iphone user?!
Those are pretty annoying
Your assumption is silly.Hate to break it to you At&t bashers, but At&t does not compete with T-mobile. Att's competitor is Verizon; T-Mo is nothing but a discount alternative and has been for years.
Really? See, because of the low density, many towers are erected in rural areas. Those towers could have been in the cities, increasing coverage where you care about it. Does that help you see the relation?the shoddy service in the US is not because of the low population density and the large area. Because most people would understand that you get spotty reception in dakota or utah. but the shoddy service is actually in the middle of big cities. Cambridge/Boston comes to mind.
The reason why the service is spotty is because there is no government oversight and no consumer protection in the US. If I had that quality of service in Europe that I have in Boston then I'm sure they would fine the hell out of the carriers and you would be entitled to suspend payments.
Already covered, but you could have tried the one in OSX.I have yet to find a dictionary which contains the noun 'cite'.![]()
Probably none of those.I want to know what this will have on the end user? Cheaper voice plans? Cheaper data plans? faster data?
Actually, they do tell you that. I find their customer service to be excellent. I was calling them just the other day and we got cut off. The CSR called me back seconds later. Never had ANY other company do such a thing. Hell, can't even get family members to do that all the time.T-mobile service sucks dooky... I have the unlimited royalty plan for 49.99 plus 30 dollar unlimited internet service which they don't tell you goes to dial up type speed once you hit 5GB!
This is welcome news!
If you've noticed, arn (or someone) has corrected it. It helps to have someone point it out. As long as you aren't an ass when doing so.Because those two minor typos entirely completely change the meaning of the article, right?
Fixed that for you.People should stop complaining. This is business. Wake up people we live in a capitalistic society. This is a win win situation for both carriers and the only people it sucks for is Verizon and sprint and T-Mobile customers.
Disagree completely. ATT is the most expensive carrier for most people. Period. It's easy to tell, just look at the prices. This is not a great move if you are currently doing fine at T-Mobile. Switching from T with the most similar plan on A would cost me $20/month right now. Also, I'm likely to add a family text plan this year, that would cost $10 more on A than T. And that's all with T's higher priced plans, I could be paying even less than I am. It's just ridiculous.Firstly, you sound. . . bitter. Secondly, raising profits? As far as what goes? For some AT&T isn't THAT expensive AND that's why T-Mobile was in trouble because they forgot this is a BUSINESS.
....
Some of you sound so clueless as to how this is a great move for ALL OF US. T-Mobile especially.
I think this just solidifies my plan to switch to V. Need to think about it more, see what happens. My plans got delayed already by idiot family members, or I would have the first week the iPhone hit V.