Maybe it's high-time Apple used some of that excess scratch and leased some bandwidth to deploy their own private-label cell network in the US?I say good riddance to them.
That's still a possible avenue, right?
Maybe it's high-time Apple used some of that excess scratch and leased some bandwidth to deploy their own private-label cell network in the US?I say good riddance to them.
Well unless you signed up for that on June 8th or later, you're outta luck. At least that's the way I read it. And since the 6GB plan has been unavailable for the iPhone since last August...I'm so glad I'm on the 6GB data plan.
Maybe it's high-time Apple used some of that excess scratch and leased some bandwidth to deploy their own private-label cell network in the US?
That's still a possible avenue, right?
MMS and tethering coming from the iPhone is unlike any other handset. We see internet usage sky rocket with the Safari share. I have to suspect AT&T and Apple are very concerned about bringing millions of these devices on-line at once and crashing the 3G infrastructure. They're going to have to bring people in little by little while keeping an eye on things. If 3G were to choke, it would affect the sacred voice calls - unthinkable. They'd revert to EDGE and that would choke and they'd have a far worse PR situation than the criticism they bare now. Patients grasshoppers, this is the iPhone we're talking about, not something that won't get used much.![]()
Unhappy AT&T customers need to start emailing Apple and the FCC to push for other carriers. The EU has already opened the door to allow competition, why do the policies here in the USA have to suck so bad?
Well, I'm sure I speak for millions of US iPhone AT&T customers when I say: Pooh.Nope. They could lease time on existing networks, but the only path now to bandwidth on wireless is via Verizon and AT&T. In 2011-12 when LTE is commodity Apple will be multi-carrier in the U.S. Until then Apple is married to AT&T and "tethered" to the AT&T rollout of 7.2 late this year and LTE late next year or beyond.
Just be glad you have the best "environment" on a "barely tolerable" network.
$70 per month will make jailbreaking soooooo much more common....
If they really charge this, I hope many remember it when the iPhone gets unlocked.
I remembered it, when Verizon was my only landline option, and I had the WORST service possible (much, much worse than AT&T. Verizon was fine for mobile, where they had competition, though.) But I don't think I'd go back to Verizon easily, because of those memories.
AT&T sucks so unbelievably bad I can hardly believe it.
Those greedy, nickel and diming basterds LOVE to stick it to iPhone users. I'll bet every single last one of those money-grubbing executives gets a nice fat bonus at the end of the year, despite the recession. They overcharge for shoddy service, shoddy support, and what will probably amount to shoddy tethering ability.
40 dollars?!?!??!!?!?!?!? Quite frankly I'd rather stare at a blank screen than give those morons more of my hard-earned cash.
I, for one, am going to start writing their customer (dis)service department on a regular basis to complain about all the nickel and diming. Who's with me?![]()
Translation: We spent so much time counting all the money we're making from all of you iPhone owners that we forgot to spend some of it towards making our network more durable.
Seriously, if they knew that they would have to do this, why did they not start on it months ago?!?!
So why doesn't Apple buy ATT?
Tethering for money is like paying the hooker twice....and a pretty substandard hooker at that![]()
I hope more and more people JB their iPhone3G/S. Even though Apple ripped Palm during the keynote, the Pre could easily capitalize on AT&Ts suckyness.
I mean, LOL. No MMS or Tethering for the iPhone 3G S in the US? Why even buy it then...
Even if they switch to Verizon the a**hole-ripping of customers will continue. In all seriousness, AT&T has to run a business so $10 of that $70 tether plan goes to buying the souls of politicians.