No. When the first 56K modem came out, it was still too slow by that days. University T1 connection was way better.I'm sure in the 90s someone said "wow I am getting 90kbps from my dial up modem... we will never need faster speeds than this!!"
No. When the first 56K modem came out, it was still too slow by that days. University T1 connection was way better.I'm sure in the 90s someone said "wow I am getting 90kbps from my dial up modem... we will never need faster speeds than this!!"
T-Mobile has been just fine. I haven't done a speed comparsion. I've been with them for two years and been to 13 cities and three countries and never not had service.So, your computer monitor is 480 x 320 px? We always need to improve because webpages get larger if the speed allows and everything increases in size - because we can.
[doublepost=1553278163][/doublepost]
To get 50% slower connection???
Ummm ... you really need to sharpen your graph reading skills. Just a friendly FYI. Unless you're being sarcastic, but then you need to tag that, because that's not apparent in your post. Jus sayin'.Amazing, according to the graph, AT&T is 50% faster than the other carriers. Even when using fake 5E, it's still much better. Thus, I really don't understand the headline that says "no faster" - as 50% is much faster?!?
AT&T are hurting the future 5G branding for other carriers and will ultimately affect their bottom line. This should be LEGALLY stopped - IMMEDIATELY.
What ever happened to being able to be sued for false advertising? Have American corporations now legislated and bought themselves so much power and control that they are immune to the legal system?!?
I'm sitting at my desk here in Silicon Valley,
I'm getting 90Mbps down and 10 Mbps up on Verizon 4G-LTE.
We need 5G on a mobile platform why?
ATT network is still hands down better especially if you travel the US and the world
The FCC should step in here and end AT&T’s practice.
wifi calling isnt voip. If you travel and want voip calling you need a voip app.That is very subjective. AT&T just charged me $230 for a call that was made over wifi. When I "complained", their only response was "if you don't like it, leave". So, I have been testing TMobile vs AT&T for the past month or so.
My real live tests within the Bay Area: AT&T wins hands down in cities like San Francisco. Once you are over the bridge, depending on location TMobile dominates. Again, real live recent testing was done for this.
AT&T is not the best, it is the best only in specific areas. Not to mention, overseas it'll cost you an arm and a leg unless you remember to turn on the international part of the plan before you go overseas.
Exactly. It’s petty with how much people gripe about this. There’s bigger fish to fry in this world.They could call anything anything -- what's the point if it doesn't really have meaning behind it?
Except that Apple isn’t falsely advertising. You buy the product as is or not. No hidden fees and if you don’t like Apple, there is plenty of competition. So not the same thing at all. (But nice try)AT&T is anti-consumer and sets bad precedent for the rest of the industry to copy like coming up with new ways to screw over consumers with fees and price increases. Much like Apple with setting precedent for $1K+ phones, removing standard accessories, etc.
There are always bigger fish to fry in this world -- pretty much nothing on the forums like this one would really rise to that level anyway. It doesn't mean that other things can't be wrong and don't deserve to be griped about.Exactly. It’s petty with how much people gripe about this. There’s bigger fish to fry in this world.