AT&T's First Mobile 5G Service Will Be Available in 12 Cities Starting Friday

[T-R-S]

$499 upfront and 15GB of data for $70 per month on a compatible plan.

$uck me I could not even make this **** up if I tried
these ISP's are doing some serious $ucking drugs!!!
I pay less than that for 2 lines unlimited Data and free roaming outside US....

 

[sirozha]

Not that can't be attributed to other sources, and VASTLY improved detection methods and screening processes.

The best detection of cancer is death. That method has always been available.

 

[T'hain Esh Kelch]

The best detection of cancer is death. That method has always been available.

This statement makes no sense. Death is a condition, not a detection method. Even then, are you aware that not all people that die, die of cancer? And in most cases where a cancer is lethal, an autopsy is required to detect the presence of cancer in any case.

 

[sirozha]

This statement makes no sense. Death is a condition, not a detection method. Even then, are you aware that not all people that die, die of cancer? And in most cases where a cancer is lethal, an autopsy is required to detect the presence of cancer in any case.

You argue that the better detection methods are to blame for higher cancer risks. That's ridiculous. Deaths from cancer have been diagnosed since 1930s or so. The better detection methods lead to fewer deaths from cancer due to early diagnoses and improved cancer treatments, but better detection methods are not to blame for higher cancer rates per se. Before the better detection methods became available, autopsies could easily identify the cause of death being cancer.

Something has happened in the past 30 years or so that has caused cancer rates to increase exponentially. You can always argue this has nothing to do with cellular or other radio-wave technology because it has never been proven to have had a correlation. Fair enough. However, in the past couple of decades I have seen multiple cases of medicines approved by the FDA only to be recalled a decade later for being extremely harmful followed by huge law suits against the manufacturers. It has happened on more than a handful of occasions. It means that the current state science is such that what appears to be scientifically sound and proven today gets completely debunked a decade later. The studies upon which the FDA bases their regulatory decisions to approve a drug turn out to be faulty a decade later. There is no such thing as exact science. The fact that it has not been scientifically proven that cellular phones cause cancer does not mean that cellular phones do not cause cancer.

If fact, the period of time when cancer rates shot up almost entirely correlates with the period of time when wireless (cordless) phones and cellular phones became widespread. There is no study that can disprove that holding your cell phone next to your brain and talking on it for hours every day does not cause brain tumors. There is also no study that can prove a correlation. We are left to rely on common sense and empirical abilities of our minds.

 

[Viper2005]

TBH eating BBQ meat once a week is a much bigger cancer risk than 5G emitters in every block.
Red meat is rated a ‘class a carcinogen’ by the WHO/IARC where wireless radiation is ‘possible’ cancer risk.

 

[fourthtunz]

There are videos on the internet proving the earth is flat and 9/11 didn't happen. What's your point?

Oof... He is actually selling tinfoil hats on his website. lol

 

[Tech198]

Great - you can now rip through your monthly data allowance in minutes.

The Need for Speed

 

[webbuzz]

They're both nuts.

 

[sirozha]

TBH eating BBQ meat once a week is a much bigger cancer risk than 5G emitters in every block.
Red meat is rated a ‘class a carcinogen’ by the WHO/IARC where wireless radiation is ‘possible’ cancer risk.

You are trying to push the LGBTQ vegan agenda here?

Here's a quote from WHO:

"Eating red meat has not yet been established as a cause of cancer. However, if the reported associations were proven to be causal, the Global Burden of Disease Project has estimated that diets high in red meat could be responsible for 50 000 cancer deaths per year worldwide."

"These numbers contrast with about 1 million cancer deaths per year globally due to tobacco smoking, 600 000 per year due to alcohol consumption, and more than 200 000 per year due to air pollution."
--------
"19. Can you compare the risk of eating red meat with the risk of eating processed meat?
Similar risks have been estimated for a typical portion, which is smaller on average for processed meat than for red meat. However, consumption of red meat has not been established as a cause of cancer."
---------
So, if we were to glean any actionable information from this "data," we should stop breathing BEFORE we should stop eating red meat.

Personally, I think if red meat is ever associated with cancer, that would be due to the kind of red meat that most people eat, which comes from animals raised on antibiotics and hormones, rather than the fact that it is red meat per se. Eat grass-fed organic red meat, and you will be fine.

Now, if you have a problem with eating animals, say so, but don't try to scare people into being vegetarians.