Sure, but it's not like the 13" M2 MBP SSD is slow. It's not. It's fast - just not as fast at the last version.
Agree that Apple overcharges for RAM and SSD - ridiculously so. But don't think it isn't premium - it's still a really fast SSD. There aren't many good choices in this price range with a faster SSD. It will be fast enough for the target user base.
Why on earth would anyone switch from a faster machine to this machine? If you're talking about people with 13" M1 MacBook Pro's then I don't think many or any of them should be switching to this M2 version. Anyone with an M1 is just throwing money away with an upgrade - I mean, if they have an M1 and it is too slow, then an M2 will be too slow as well. Those folks would need an M1 Pro/Max/Ultra for their work and should not be looking at this M2.
Put simply, this machine isn't aimed for folks with last year's machine. It's targeted at people who are still on Intel Macs, or are new to Macs in general.
Agree. That marginal difference is what makes the market positioning of this machine very confusing. It sets an expectation that it will be 'Pro', but it's really the same consumer class of machine as a MacBook Air with slightly better sustained performance and battery life in a chunkier (older) chassis.
I'm pretty sure the only reason Apple makes them is that people buy still them.
Sure the SSD is slower on benchmarks, but in the real world, most of the stuff that folks will be using this machine for will feel the same or faster than an M1. However, like I said above - any who is upgrading from an M1 is doing it wrong. The people really buying this are coming from Intel or Windows and they will likely be very happy with the performance that they get for the money.