But you can turn it to 11?!
![]()
Brian May's custom AC30's go to 12!
But you can turn it to 11?!
![]()
Yeah... isn't happiness the worst?!
3 great reasons not to listen.
Its amusing, I find, that they present it as if these people - Zane, Reznor etc. - are actually responsible for something. My perspective is that they are more like paid frontmen, whilst the planning is done in the closed Cupertino boardrooms beforehand. Of course, they will put a little input in towards the end of the planning and actualising of the project but not to the extent to which they are presented. They will get paid well though, without a doubt, and gain the name and fame they yearn so much. Which incidentally goes to show just how much profit Apple are making out of this venture.
Zane might have a team of researchers / producers around him, but there isn't a chance he'll just be a puppet for Apple. Zane will absolutely be responsible for a lot of the content - bit pointless bringing him on board not to make best use of him. I don't think he's gone there to be famous, he's gone there because he's great at what he does, and Apple found him.
And its not just Zane - they have also taken a few key people from BBC Introducing.
I know Radio 1 (especially the evening schedules) is unfamiliar to you guys in the US, but trust me - if that's what Beats 1 is to a large degree basing itself on, its in safe hands with Zane running a good part of the show.
My point is not that he is useless or anything LOL. Of course he has his qualities and is probably great at what he does and has a lot to offer. My point is about the planning and organisation of the radio programming project.
That's what I mean though - I can't imagine Zane being anything other than completely hands on and be playing a big role in all of that.
Fair enough. Its only opinion anyway, and everybody's got one of those LOL. Me included![]()
Absolutely - but if you're in the US, chances are Zane is an unknown quantity to you. Some of us in the UK have been listening to his show for years though. He isn't everyone's cup of tea, but there's not denying his enthusiasm for, and knowledge of, music. And he'll basically play anything - definitely not restricted to hip hop for example.
I suppose it will be interesting to know the variety across the schedules though, rather than get hung up on Zane who will likely only be doing maybe 10-15 hours a week.
It will be interesting to see how the schedules go - again using Radio 1 as an example, the daytime schedules are more chart / pop orientated, and then the evening shows are more diverse, and play a lot more new and lesser known stuff.
And it works really well, in that a lot of the newer, lesser known stuff filters through to the daytime schedules are artists become better known.
That sort of thing might kind of work on Beats 1, but the fact that it is broadcasting worldwide to different time zones would make it a bit different. For example, from what I have gathered, Zane's show will be on earlier LA time, so it broadcasts in the late afternoon / early evening here in Europe.
So if traditionally an evening audience is different to a daytime audience, that may be an odd one to navigate.
Back in the day John Peel's 10pm - midnight slot was the go-to for new music... definitely better than Steve Wright in the Afternoon LOL.![]()
I think getting Trent on board was a huge success of that $3 billion purchase. I think most are underestimating his worth in the recording industry.
Those were the days - I've been to a few Glastonbury's and always would have liked to bump into him and say hello.
We did bump into Jo Willey one year though, so my wife was very excited. Definitely not the same though!
yeah because there's only one team at Apple working on everything. they can't fix anything in OS X because they're too busy hiring celebritiesThe public's infatuation with celebrities is one of the reasons why it's terrifying. Apple pandering to this crowd isn't surprising, just disappointing. There are many more worthwhile features (Docker kernel support on OS X, iConnect metrics, better curation and promotion on the app store) that actually mean something with respect to pushing computing/humanity forward, that deserve resources instead of this.
This is why I haven't given up on Google.
(The public is also terrifyingly stupid)
Reznor was quoted a few months ago stating that he was directly working on the project. Given his background, I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't a bit more involved than some people might first think. I think Iovine also stated this in an interview shortly after the WWDC keynote.Its amusing, I find, that they present it as if these people - Lowe, Reznor etc. - are actually responsible for something. My perspective is that they are more like paid frontmen, whilst the planning is done in the closed Cupertino boardrooms beforehand. Of course, they will put a little input in towards the end of the planning and actualising of the project but not to the extent to which they are presented. They will get paid well though, without a doubt, and gain the name and fame they yearn so much. Which incidentally goes to show just how much profit Apple are making out of this venture.
Back in the day John Peel's 10pm - midnight slot was the go-to for new music... definitely better than Steve Wright in the Afternoon LOL.![]()