Dr. Dre Senior VP at Apple...sounds phenomenal.
And when did the change to x86 happen? Under Jobs. We don't know if cook is capable of doing this, and if it's a forced app on my phone I'll be pissed.
If they're doing this to just absorb their assets, keep beats by dr dre going on its own path then fine, whatever no harm done. If they force the beats name onto everyone, I will buy an android to replace my 5.
Okay, keep denying the obvious. You're right...Apple paid $3.2 billion for nothing, because Tim Cook, the board of directors and the whole company have suddenly lost their minds. That's more plausible than Beats retaining licensing deals for a certain period of time regardless of acquisitions.
This is an obvious buy. Competing successful music service. Beats has only grown since inception. It has the market on headphones, and turned premium headphones into a music subscription, with the potential for who knows what else.
Those that are acting like they are stupid on this basic concept probably would have no problem if this was someone from the Beetles.
Smh
Kinda like Microsoft adding Metallica to the board of directors. Strange.
$3 Billion for basically nothing...
Is "urban youth" a euphemism for something?
They want Beats Music. It got around 750.000 users within the first month of it being in use, and has excellent music rights.
I haven't personally used them and I'm not one to care about bass but they've got to be able to improve MacBooks' and iMacs' speakers.
If anything Dre would "advise" Cook to fix something when he realizes mbs have not even the slightest amount of bass.
As for the Beatles, can't really say, never liked there music. more over rated rubbish. Only one had any real talent and he went loopy after visiting India.
Laptop speakers are never going to have bass. They can improve the quality of the midrange and treble and even use special ported cabinet designs to bring the frequency response down into the 100hz area with their full range drivers. They could even stick 2" micro subwoofer drivers in there and possibly get down to 75hz, though I really don't see that happening with space being such a premium in laptops these days. Real sub-bass requires a big driver that can push a lot of air. It's just not possible to do that in a laptop.
I don't think Dre could "advise" Cook to do anything when his own line of headphones don't even sound good. Sure they have bass, but its an overbloated and boomy mess.
Apple please, you cannot associate yourself with this company! You are not ghetto style, you are high quality with the best hardware, moving in with "beats" or Dre or whoever the other guy is,, is the worst move you can make.
Popeye's chicken would be better.
![]()
So this hasn't been announced - only Dr. Dre has been saying something and the Journal is talking about these guys taking senior positions at Apple?
This sounds like an April Fools release that got delayed for some reason I think what's going to happen is that next week will come and no announcement will happen.
You're all SO loyal to Apple, "threatening" to leave a superb, rock solid company for Android devices? Lol... so leave - seeya - start a poll if this rumour turns out to be true, stating that you've "abandoned" or "boycotted" Apple, and I'll fetch my calculator to work out what fraction of the 0.00000000001% of Apple's customers you represent, and how that "loss" will affect anyone at Apple, or any other Apple product owners and users.
Who are your pre-emptitive outburst rage quit threats meant to affect? Google is full of people expressing varying levels of "disappointment" at Apple... pfft...
Lmao.
This has been said before, the rights to Beats music is not transferable to Apple.
EDIT: Guy above me beat me to what I wrote.
I guess a couple of points. First, Beats doesn't really strike me as a company Apple would usually acquire. Hasn't Apple's M.O. been about acquiring "smaller" corporations and then integrating their tech into future apple products? Hasn't it been about finding the tech that will revolutionize future products, and then integrating that tech into all things Apple? It's strange that Apple would choose Beats as it first real big acquisition.
Second, while I don't share this view, there are some who say that Apple products are over-priced. Obviously everyone on these forums know that's not true. From their later resale value, to longevity of their use, to the fact that Apple just makes really awesome products for its customers. But everything I have read about Beats, the number one complaint seems to be, well I guess two complaints, is that there quality is mediocre, and second that they are overpriced. Isn't this kind of just reinforcing that stereotype for all the "haters" out there? Doesn't this possibly provide ammunition for those people to overdrive the hype machine that this is just one overpriced company buying another? Has this been fully thought through by the Leadership at Apple?
My Moto G has very good bass for it's diminutive size; that's not true.
I guess a couple of points. First, Beats doesn't really strike me as a company Apple would usually acquire. Hasn't Apple's M.O. been about acquiring "smaller" corporations and then integrating their tech into future apple products? Hasn't it been about finding the tech that will revolutionize future products, and then integrating that tech into all things Apple? It's strange that Apple would choose Beats as it first real big acquisition.
Second, while I don't share this view, there are some who say that Apple products are over-priced. Obviously everyone on these forums know that's not true. From their later resale value, to longevity of their use, to the fact that Apple just makes really awesome products for its customers. But everything I have read about Beats, the number one complaint seems to be, well I guess two complaints, is that there quality is mediocre, and second that they are overpriced. Isn't this kind of just reinforcing that stereotype for all the "haters" out there? Doesn't this possibly provide ammunition for those people to overdrive the hype machine that this is just one overpriced company buying another? Has this been fully thought through by the Leadership at Apple?
this deal makes is Apple vs Spotify instead of Apple vs Beats vs Spotify.