hah, I came down to the comment section with expectation to read how people would mention skin tone.....
just as expected!
just as expected!
They were already ruined to want to have anything to do with her. I mean, exhibit A: Kanye West.Alternative title🤣
Beats Fit Pro Now Available to Order in the Shades of Men the Kardashians Have Ruined
![]()
The Black Men the Kardashians Have Ruined | The Root
It's time to finally ask: is the Kardashian Curse real?www.theroot.com
You must have been asleep that time they force-installed U2.I've lost respect for Apple like WTF why collaborate with this talentless tart
Yeah Jobs was doing those keynotes and paying himself in stock for the fun of it.It hasn't been the old Apple since Tim Cook took over. It's all about sales now hence this collaboration.
Aren’t these being marketed as matching various skin tones?hah, I came down to the comment section with expectation to read how people would mention skin tone.....
just as expected!
She looks better than 90%+ of 41 year old American women.If Kim was on a dating app as her unphotoshopped self, I wouldn't even recognize her and I'd swipe no. Also...
View attachment 2043757
Wtf?
She looks better than 90%+ of 41 year old American women.
If Kim was on a dating app as her unphotoshopped self, I wouldn't even recognize her and I'd swipe no. Also...
Apple has always partnered with celebrities. Always. Maybe you’re no longer aligned with what Apple have always stood for?not the point its what apple stands for. this is not our old apple any longer.
Yeah, the comments are a race to the bottom. Fat shaming, misogyny, jealously, racism.hah, I came down to the comment section with expectation to read how people would mention skin tone.....
just as expected!
Apple has always partnered with celebrities. Always. Maybe you’re no longer aligned with what Apple have always stood for?
Yeah, the comments are a race to the bottom. Fat shaming, misogyny, jealously, racism.
I’m quite sure this is the first time they’ve partnered with a porn star, but I don’t keep too close track on that. Now that they’re an “entertainment” company, maybe it’s not the first.
Oh and you forgot climate change and transphobia.
You won’t buy it purely because they used Kim? Wow. If you like the colours, you like the colours. I guess people can be more influenced by advertising than I was aware.Her hands look wrinkled. The colors are nice. I wont buy it because of the association. I would otherwise. I don’t need a celebrity attached to beats headphones and havent in quite some time now. I don’t know anyone else who needs this either.
Oh much easier for sure, but it is impressive how she was able to do this despite becoming well known off the back of a sex tape - something which has sunk or stalled the careers of many others. That’s some A grade image rehab.Is it, though? She was born into wealth and has never had to 'work' as we would know it. She was obviously born with good genetics (though subjective) and has business-minded relationships. Impressive on paper, but perhaps not on a human level.
well yeah. all everyone is talking about are skin tones. not the products.Aren’t these being marketed as matching various skin tones?
I think it means you can choose a color that matches your skin tone (blend in), or one that contrasts with it (stand out).How does that work?
While I agree with you on not really digging anything to do with Kim K, as an Apple shareholder I hope they are a hit.Apple should have collaborated with well-respected late Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan. I really hope these don't sell well.
You are conflating the Beats brand with the Apple brand though. Apple hasn’t really merged the two brands in marketing so Beats is probably always going to continue to target a similar demographic as before.WOw...wow...in the 90s they had Jim Henson...MLK...Cesar Chavez...even Project RED with Bono. 2022 the most materialistic, contradicting, selfish family in the world. Times have changed. Never thought i would see the day.
Kim K has done nothing illegal. And if people want to talk about morals… And let’s just look at the Beats Brand. Dr Dre has a very very chequered past that includes several assault charges, many Domestic Violence accusations and admissions, DUI and so much more. Yet Apple are still happy to use his Beats product name.You are conflating the Beats brand with the Apple brand though. Apple hasn’t really merged the two brands in marketing so Beats is probably always going to continue to target a similar demographic as before.
Look at www.beatsbydre.com. Apple is practically nowhere to be found except a mention of the Apple purchase on the About Us page and this copyright mark.
It’s not Macrumors. It’s Beats/Apple calling it "Beats x Kim"I think I just object to how macrumors is referring to these. “Kardashian’s new colors?” Skin tone colors are her colors? I think skin tone shades is a nice addition.
Kim K has done nothing illegal. And if people want to talk about morals… And let’s just look at the Beats Brand. Dr Dre has a very very chequered past that includes several assault charges, many Domestic Violence accusations and admissions, DUI and so much more. Yet Apple are still happy to use his Beats product name.
What is worse? Porn tape and great business acumen, or Domestic Violence, Assaults and great business acumen?