Last edited:
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Beats Launching New Studio3 Wireless Headphones With Pure Adaptive Noise Cancelation
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I'm mostly excited about that Canadian exchange rate.
$350USD = $433CAD
Hopefully this means a drop in price for AirPods and Apple Watch following the September event.
$350USD = $433CAD
Hopefully this means a drop in price for AirPods and Apple Watch following the September event.
You'd be dead wrong... I own the QC35s and have listened to various Beats headphones/earphones and they're not better at all than the Bose...
But Bose QC35 doesn't feature the W1 chip. And the QC35 doesn't have all that great audio quality. I own a pair myself, and the noise cancellation is stellar and they have great multi-device bluetooth but it doesn't work as great as the Apple W1 on my AirPods and the audio quality is lacking.
More features? Like what? The biggest problem with the MDR1000X is how badly they work between multiple devices. You pretty much have to re-pair them every single time. It's a damn hassle.
[doublepost=1504558051][/doublepost]
As one who owned Beats Studio Wireless v2.0 before selling them and getting the B&O BeoPlay H7 and later the H9 and Bose QC35 I can't say the have inferior audio. QC35 has the worst audio of them all, but they also feature much better active noise cancellation so I still use them on plane rides.
bummer about the micro-usb.. that's a pretty un_user_friendly style plug..
Beats today introduced new Studio3 Wireless over-ear headphones with Apple's custom W1 chip and Pure Adaptive Noise Canceling technology.
Beats Studio3 Wireless deliver up to 22 hours of battery life with Pure ANC on, and up to 40 hours with Pure ANC off. Fast Fuel quick charging technology via Micro-USB provides three hours of music playback with a 10-minute charge.
Here's how Beats describes Pure ANC:Like AirPods, Apple's W1 chip enables the Studio3 Wireless to instantly pair with an iPhone, iPad, Mac, or other Apple device, with seamless switching between iCloud-connected devices.
Apple's W1 chip has Class 1 Bluetooth, so the Studio3 Wireless can be used with non-Apple devices as well.
Studio3 Wireless wearers can answer phone calls, control music, and activate Siri with multifunction on-ear controls, while a 3.5mm RemoteTalk cable with in-line controls is also included in the carrying case.
Beats Studio3 Wireless can be ordered on Apple's website starting today for $349.95 in the United States, $399.95 in Canada, and £299.95 in the UK. Prices vary elsewhere. Shipments are estimated to begin in mid October.
The headphones look virtually the same as the original Beats Studio Wireless, including soft over-ear cushions. There are six colors to choose from: Red, Matte Black, White, Porcelain Rose, and Shadow Gray.
Article Link: Beats Launching New Studio3 Wireless Headphones With Pure Adaptive Noise Cancelation
oh well
i'm disappointed that apple keeps pushing wireless headphones and prides themselves on quality, but they still don't support things like aptX HD for higher quality audio...
still hoping this will change with the iphone8, but these headphones just made it more unlikely.
still hoping this will change with the iphone8, but these headphones just made it more unlikely.
I think the advantage with the QC35 is dual connectivity. I love my AirPods and the W1 chip but you can only connect it to one device at once. When I'm on my Mac, I want to have them connected to it because a lot of what I do in my job requires sound. Then when I get a call, I have to answer, tell them to hang on and then switch to my iPhone (my calls don't always come through on my Mac). The QC35s have smart switching where you can be connected to both so that if a call comes through, it will pause what you're doing on your computer. It is my only gripe with BeatsX and the AirPods. C'mon Apple.
How much is a CABLE dude? Seriously. A USB-A to USB-C cable is pennies to apple, so include a 3 footer in the package. It's not hard.
The fact is that micro USB is terrible. You're always fiddling with the orientation of the plug, and even then it doesn't always feel like it's going in correctly.
USB-C isn't "proprietary" and would have been clearly the better, and certainly more on-brand option here.
This comment doesn’t make sense unless Bose magically starts shipping headphones with W1 chip.
I don't think he was asking for lightning cable either. I'm pretty sure usb-c would have been the best choice. More durable and still has the convenience of reversible like lightning.
Didn't expect them to use Micro USB for charging. At least lightning or USB-C. This is the kind of annoying lack of consideration that baffles me where Apple is concerned. I could really carry a USB-C to lightning cable and charge my iPhone as well as Beats but no, gotta carry a specific odd-one-out micro-usb connector! Why...
I mean, I was just adding USB-C to the Lightning suggestion, and although I tend to agree with you, that wouldn't necessarily be a big issue as long as a Lightning cable is included. Nice foot in the door technique
And Lightning is a nice reversible, compact standard. People would have to have a separate charger just for the headphones? That's what many iPhone users will now have to have, when owning these Besides Micro-USB being really bad (non-reversible and flimsy as hell) the biggest issue in my opinion is paying $350 for brand new late 2017 headphones with a charging standard that is on the way out.
I prefer the Airpods too, I had a bad experience with large headphones not feeling comfortable. However I find it's a shame the Airpods battery wears so quickly and the fact they keep wasting battery if not inside that charger case. Also the volume could be improved, I always have to increase in the app I use (nPlayer).
Seems like Beats hardware is still a separate company. I wonder how involved Apple hardware engineers are in these products?
I think a much bigger problem with them is the bad design where the plastic in the headband cracks and Sony is being very difficult about honoring the warranty on them.
Might it be because Apple support Bluetooth AAC? That's 256kbps AAC, the exact same quality as Apple Music offers on "High"? APT-X is only 356 kbps so it's hardly any better and it has a major drawback in the fact that you have to re-encode all the audio as none of your audio on iOS, Android or anywhere else really is encoded using SBC which is the codec APTX uses. So if Apple had used APTX the audio would be encoded lossy 256kbps AAC, then re-encoded/transcoded into lossy SBC before playback. Re-encoding/transcoding from one lossy encode to another will almost always reduce the quality even further, even when going to a higher bitrate. It will NEVER be able to improve the quality as you can't take a lossy format and add back information that has already been lost during the first encoding.
So there is basically no way that APTX could improve the audio quality for Apple. For Android it makes more sense as Google has no guidelines for what codecs is being used in their apps, so some apps features MP3 (LAME), other OGG Vorbis, some Opus, some AAC, other FLAC etc... When you have no control the best thing is to simply relay on whatever gives you the highest bandwidth and APTX has an edge with its 356kbps vs 256kbps for AAC.
But for Apple, especially with iOS where 99% of all audio is encoded using AAC as that's what Apple guides all developers to use in apps and is what pretty much every music streaming services uses on iOS it doesn't make any sense to use APTX (SBC) over AAC.
The weird part is though, Beats X uses Apples W1 chip and Lightning connector while this headset uses Apples W1 but not Lightning. Very odd....
One would think this was something Apple would be capable of doing. Perhaps Bose has some kind of patent on this? Both Music Sharing (playback audio on two different Bose QC35 and the same time from a single device) and the multi-point/multi-devices seems to be a Bose QC35 exclusive thing.
It's not all that hard doing this manually on the AirPods as you simply answer the call and select the AirPods as speakers and they connect instantly even when they are connect to your Mac. So Apple is able to "grab" connection seamlessly without the need for re-pairing which pretty much everyone else would require. But it still a hassle compared to the seamless switching that Bose offers.
