Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just phoned up Three and they tried to sell me the 12 month One Plan (which is only £15 - amazing value I admit) but I'm not ready for that kind of commitment ;)

The guy changed me to the £18 1 month plan right away, said it would be effective on my next bill. They are putting the prices back up on Monday according to the guy I spoke to so ring up and do it now if you want a lower bill for nothing :D

Thanks bp1000 for bringing the lower prices to my attention so I could make use of this deal! Well chuffed with my cheap as chips One Plan :)

No problem

Dirt cheap for what it is

Since switching from O2 I've had 3G signal pretty much everywhere even rural places which surprised me and up to 8x the speeds compared to o2.
 
No problem

Dirt cheap for what it is

Since switching from O2 I've had 3G signal pretty much everywhere even rural places which surprised me and up to 8x the speeds compared to o2.

Yeah for sure, unlimited tethering on its own makes it worth it at £25, at £18 it's an absolute steal :D

I get decent signal in most areas but when I'm not at uni I get no signal at home which irritates me. Out and about and while I'm at uni the reception is a little iffy but basically good. The data speeds are certainly better than O2 though. In fact, despite the better reception, O2's data network was crap compared to Three's IMO. That's mainly why I left giffgaff.
 
In my experience, in the central areas of London, Three is fine and has very good data speeds compared to the competition, but outside of that the signal is very temperamental. I often struggle to get signal in London. When I'm at uni in a comparatively rural area, however, my signal is fine... unless I walk into the wrong building, then it disappears.

That is the one downside with Three. Very good prices and very fast internet but the coverage is a lot less reliable than the others.

97% coverage isn't the best but it's hardly worth noting I think. The thing with 3 is that they have a poor 2G network as they are a 3G network. In London they don't have a 2G network at all - if you lose 3G service you lose service completely.

However for their speeds, their ultrafast/3.9G network, the unlimited data, cheap prices and the fact they won't charge extra for 4G, I can't think of many reasons not to be on 3!
 
97% coverage isn't the best but it's hardly worth noting I think. The thing with 3 is that they have a poor 2G network as they are a 3G network. In London they don't have a 2G network at all - if you lose 3G service you lose service completely.

However for their speeds, their ultrafast/3.9G network, the unlimited data, cheap prices and the fact they won't charge extra for 4G, I can't think of many reasons not to be on 3!

It really depends on what area you in. Some parts of the country will get no signal on Three at all. Other parts of the country, however, will get a perfect signal and never have problems. When I'm at home away from uni I get barely any signal at all. If I stayed at home for most of year I would seriously consider leaving Three over that. But luckily I don't.

And Three doesn't have a 2G network, they never have, if you get 2G on Three it's roaming to Orange's network.

Three is absolutely the best value network in the country but the coverage is still an issue. Maybe they'll fix this when they roll out the LTE network though since I think the band they're using is meant to provide a stronger signal.
 
It really depends on what area you in. Some parts of the country will get no signal on Three at all. Other parts of the country, however, will get a perfect signal and never have problems. When I'm at home away from uni I get barely any signal at all. If I stayed at home for most of year I would seriously consider leaving Three over that. But luckily I don't.

And Three doesn't have a 2G network, they never have, if you get 2G on Three it's roaming to Orange's network.

Three is absolutely the best value network in the country but the coverage is still an issue. Maybe they'll fix this when they roll out the LTE network though since I think the band they're using is meant to provide a stronger signal.

I know they don't have their 'own' 2G network but they still have one. Except in London where they don't even have a virtual 2G network.

I'd be interested to know where your home is, as I live in the Lake District and I get 3G service there...
 
I know they don't have their 'own' 2G network but they still have one. Except in London where they don't even have a virtual 2G network.

I'd be interested to know where your home is, as I live in the Lake District and I get 3G service there...

Don't really want to say on a public forum TBH. I can tell you that I get perfect signal on O2 and Vodafone and fairly reasonable signal on T-Mobile/Orange though. Three's the only one which is virtually dead in the house.
 
Of course it is. Apple decided to make a change in naming on regional basis. In Australia no one uses the term LTE and all telcos utilise the 4G term instead, but it is one the the same thing.

Btw; It is official, give Telstra a call and they will explain it...

What?

Telstra still refer to it as LTE. http://www.telstra.com.au/mobile-phones/coverage-networks/networks/4G

DC-HSPA is also employed by Telstra, and according to a Telstra rep it is 1.1-20 Mbps. http://whrl.pl/Rc2JeJ This is 3G and is referred to as such, including on the Telstra Coverage map.

So, the question still remains, why was our service previously referred to as LTE (and is still referred to as an LTE service on the Telstra website) if we are only getting HSPA+ (whether Dual Channel or not)?
 
Response from Apple, refer to bold

Venomrush:
My research on the Internet seems to say Apple has rename the LTE to 4G for carriers outside the US

Venomrush:
I would be more comfortable talking to a senior advisor if you don't mind Cameron

Cameron:
I understand, but there are a lot of rumors out there and if it did not come directly from us you can't be sure of it, I can assure you that we can't change the label of the service a service provider uses, because the info comes from the carrier themselves. I will be more than happy to get you over to a senior advisor, one moment please Venomrush

Cameron:
Thank you for being so patient and understanding! I have a senior advisor on the other line that will be able to assist you from here okay?

Ben:
Thanks for contacting AppleCare chat support. My name is Ben. Please give me a moment to review your information.

Ben:
Hello Venomrush, I understand that you have some questions about your phone, iOS 7 and cellular data.

Ben:
I'm going to do my best to answer them for you

Venomrush:
I have been talking to Cameron relating to the information display on the iPhone for the high speed data network

Venomrush:
Would you be able to advise Apple internal definitions of LTE/4G. What is the difference between 4G and LTE? What is the speed range for 4G and speed range for LTE? What is the technology used for 4G and LTE that makes iPhone displays differently. As there must be a reason to show either LTE or 4G

Ben:
Sure, I'll be happy to answer those, First Each region defines 4G and LTE separately so I cannot give you equivalent throughput bandwidths. The terms are the furthest Homologation of the GSM AND UTMS standards. LTE or long term evolution is the fastest throughput standard that 4G can achieve at present.

Venomrush:
My argument that there were changes during the transition to iOS7 came from this thread https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1608371/ - from here, if you spend some time reading through the posts. Only the users on US carrier such as Verizon see the LTE. While the rest of the users outside of the US all confirmed it has been changed to display 4G

Ben:
Where 4G can be considered the highest current band, LTE can be considered 4G on turbo. The maximum download rate of LTE devices is up to about 300 MBs, however, the real world application of that depends on power consumption, signal rate, and location, along with the limitation of maximum speeds provided by the carrier.

Ben:
I'm sorry Venomrush, that information is incorrect.

Ben:
Its conjecture, and there is nothing wrong with the discussion, but I can confirm that is inaccurate.

Ben:
LTE and 4G are not listed the same on any Apple devices or software because they are not the same

Ben:
Further the label of the data network is actually provided by the carrier's tower. Your phone finds a tower and connects to it, and it uses the highest possible data network available to it. It receives the label from the cellular service,

Venomrush:
I understand. As you can image, this will cause some concerns for me as an end user. Is this my carrier that is not offering LTE service as advertised or Apple fault? With the evidence that my colleague is on the same carrier using the iPhone 5 on iOS6 sees LTE while I am on iOS7 and see 4G, in a way points to the fault is with the device (we are both sitting in the same room)

Ben:
Venomrush, thats a good question, and if there is a fault with the device, we would want to get hat addressed, you are in warranty and that should not be an issue. I can confirm that iOS 7 will display the appropriate data network label. If you are not able to get connected to that network and it is available in your carrier, and in your area, then we would advise to complete via iTunes a step called the restore as new.

Ben:
This is a full factory reinstall of the device, returning it to brand new software condition, without the restoration of a backup, to test whether under optimal conditions the device is performing approriately
 
Last edited:
I think the carriers determine if they use "LTE" vs "4G".

I updated my carrier settings yesterday to enable visual voicemail, ever since doing so, it now displays 4G, before the carrier settings update yesterday, it said "LTE", both times running iOS 7 GM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.