https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10152419224402297&id=62507427296Hehe.
This made me laugh.
This made me laugh.
<3 Maher's humor, delivery, and democratic values he preaches.
Can't seem to view the video though for some strange reason![]()
Ah sh!!![]()
Maybe someone will find the correct link.
I agree to a point - Apple, although it is still heavily in the lead with the processors, has shown very marginal improvements to justify forking over $900+ for a new phone. If you are someone who has a 5s or older, then yes - this phone is a great update. If you have something newer, then I question why you really need to buy a phone so soon when your phone: 1) Has the same form factor, 2) Is still very fast, and is faster than any other Android phones on the market, 3) Still has the same iOS update cycle as the 7/plus, and 4) Has a headphone jack (Yes I won't let go of this joke yet).
Arguments can be made of, "Well duh - customers don't have to buy it if they don't like it." But when has Apple fallen into this sort of thinking? Weren't they the ones who made customers point fingers at OTHER phone manufacturers to up their standards? Now it's Apple that's fallen behind in a lot of aspects - they JUST got water coating, still NO wireless charging, using a LIGHTNING port instead of the universal USB C, mediocre 720/1080p displays, mediocre battery sizes relative to what is the norm of the phone ecosystem, mediocre voice assistance compared to Google's, and a lukewarm music service that is Apple Music.
TL;DR - If you got a pretty old phone, yeah, the iPhone 7 is a justifiable upgrade. But for everyone else, unless you have a valid reason (ex. phone broken, etc.), then you're feeding into Maher's criticism - buying into the hype machine, and coming out only to satisfy the board members and stock holders. Apple's direction with the iPhone is very safe, and unimpressive.
I laughed at a few of those. Clearly satire with a bitnifntruth mixed in, as is the case with the best satire.
Haha. Posting from my iPhone today lol. I often tap "n" instead of space bar for whatever reason. I guess my right thumb isn't going far enough down at times. And I guess autocorrect isn't catching it.I've been seeing some weird "words" in your posts today. What's up?
I agree to a point - Apple, although it is still heavily in the lead with the processors, has shown very marginal improvements to justify forking over $900+ for a new phone. If you are someone who has a 5s or older, then yes - this phone is a great update. If you have something newer, then I question why you really need to buy a phone so soon when your phone: 1) Has the same form factor, 2) Is still very fast, and is faster than any other Android phones on the market, 3) Still has the same iOS update cycle as the 7/plus, and 4) Has a headphone jack (Yes I won't let go of this joke yet).
Arguments can be made of, "Well duh - customers don't have to buy it if they don't like it." But when has Apple fallen into this sort of thinking? Weren't they the ones who made customers point fingers at OTHER phone manufacturers to up their standards? Now it's Apple that's fallen behind in a lot of aspects - they JUST got water coating, still NO wireless charging, using a LIGHTNING port instead of the universal USB C, mediocre 720/1080p displays, mediocre battery sizes relative to what is the norm of the phone ecosystem, mediocre voice assistance compared to Google's, and a lukewarm music service that is Apple Music.
TL;DR - If you got a pretty old phone, yeah, the iPhone 7 is a justifiable upgrade. But for everyone else, unless you have a valid reason (ex. phone broken, etc.), then you're feeding into Maher's criticism - buying into the hype machine, and coming out only to satisfy the board members and stock holders. Apple's direction with the iPhone is very safe, and unimpressive.
He does have his own TV show... someone must disagree with you...Bill is an idiot, a hater, a whack job and a funkball.
The problem with this argument is that "worth" varies from person to person. Some people spend $400 (and a lot more) on a dinner out, or a single event. And I'm not just talking about absurdly wealthy people - even middle class folks may dedicate that kind of money to something that they really value. Is $400 an absurd amount to spend on a meal once a year, or football tickets, or designer clothes, or a modest phone upgrade? Reasonable minds can differ.The iphone 7 isn't worth $400 to rent for a year.