This is such an elitist statement. To think that people who buy macs have to have some sort of higher calling and need to do such lofty things with their computers. What is so wrong with someone buying a mac to surf the net and write papers? Your statement is part of the reason why people think mac users are such snobs and fanboys.
As far as the link for your iphone build quality, here ya go. http://baltimore.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2008/11/24/daily18.html?ana=yfcpc
....
Thanks for the link, and no, it's not an elitist statement. It's just not very smart to buy a machine for $1100 to do things that a $650 machine can do with absolutely no differences.
I am not talking about iWork, or iLife or other Mac specific things here.
Calm down and wake up.
Once again, thanks for the link.
Yes, same reason why some people think the lack of a keyboard on the iPhone is a plus while some think it's a minus. Do you not remember the very first reviews of the iPhone? Those were some of the most unbiased ones you could find since many didn't have the chance to be wowed by the OS which is the best part of the phone as proven by the Storm's negative reviews.
Thanks for the link, and no, it's not an elitist statement. It's just not very smart to buy a machine for $1100 to do things that a $650 machine can do with absolutely no differences.
I am not talking about iWork, or iLife or other Mac specific things here.
Calm down and wake up.
Once again, thanks for the link.
I have my macbook because i got tired of windows vista crashing and locking up on me. I can do a lot on my macbook that i can't do on windows. i hate writing and 20 page paper and having my pc crash on page 18. There is nothing wrong with people buying something they don't exactly need some people do act like they are better for using mac products but every brand has those snobs.
Why isn't it smart? Macs come with a totally different OS with a totally different user experience. Plus, both hardware and software are made by Apple, so at least you know the quality is more consistent (which it is).
By your 'logic', everyone would be driving a cheap car to get from point A to point B since that is the primary reason of using a car.
apple builds their computers but they don't MAKE their hardware. Not sure where you got that idea.
Regarding quality, Apple has had it's fair share of widespread issues (cracking palm rest area on prior MB).
The premium you pay for an apple is for the OS and the sleek style of an apple computer. Don't fool yourself into thinking it's much more than that.
I'm not denouncing apple either, I plan on buying an iMac and i own an iPhone.
The OS is wonderful on apple and the style of them is gorgeous, but don't try and justify the price, it's a luxury computer so of course you'll pay a premium.
.....
....
apple builds their computers but they don't MAKE their hardware. Not sure where you got that idea.
Regarding quality, Apple has had it's fair share of widespread issues (cracking palm rest area on prior MB).
The premium you pay for an apple is for the OS and the sleek style of an apple computer. Don't fool yourself into thinking it's much more than that.
I'm not denouncing apple either, I plan on buying an iMac and i own an iPhone.
The OS is wonderful on apple and the style of them is gorgeous, but don't try and justify the price, it's a luxury computer so of course you'll pay a premium.
I can agree, but the very VERY played out car analogy is skewed, greatly skewed.
People buy Macs for one reason or another then use them to do whatever they wish. Same thing for a car. Sometimes people buy cars for the same reason.
But you can't compare a $35,000 investment to a $2,000 investment, and if the analogy were to be accurate it would be more like comparing a Buick to an Aston Martin with the only difference between the two being the interior of the cab.
I am no car guru, but I know that the AM will have much more to offer over the buick than a plush interior.
And I agree wholeheartedly. No one should be suckered into getting a Mac if the differences in OS and software are not one of the top reasons.
To bring it back on topic, it's the same for any phone. Both devices have their limitations, both (any) have their plusses. Now it seams that any phone with a large touch screen is automatically deemed an iPhone killer, then once the device doesn't have the SAME EXACT THINGS the iPhone has it's shot down as a failure.
Not to mention that everyone instantly forgets about the issues the first iPhone and iPhone 3G had/has/will have in the future.
The car analogy is one that everyone can relate to.
If someone asks me, I'll recommend Mac under certain certain circumstances. For example, if the person is looking for something affordable and/or for the kids, then I would agree with you and wouldn't recommend a Mac.
Time to sell RIM shares if you have them.
It is a very clever quote, but i just don't like the ipod part.
Gee, so after the Storm has made you deaf, just turn the volume down, stupid. What a fix!
What's even more insidious about this is, a person checking a Storm out on dispplay would probably never encounter this, and thus wouldn't know it can happen until they've bought one ... assuming they buy one.
Yeah, reminds one of the iPhone's infamous headphone jack problem. What? You suddenly don't hear anything unless it's on speakerphone? Ooops, just poke the headphones into the device a few times to free things up. What a fix
Not to say it never happened, but I never heard of the issue.