There's a long list, let's not go there.Fcpx is a disaster. Howso?
There's a long list, let's not go there.Fcpx is a disaster. Howso?
Nope, no "major" updates. I agree with him.WHAT A LOAD OF BS
Same. If you think of Final Cut like a good camera body, customizable with your own choices for extensibility, it's absolutely amazing. Been using it every day in a corporate/commercial environment for nearly a decade and still enjoy i
Oh don’t get me wrong. I cut broadcast major network shows and high end music videos on fcpx. I push it to its limits. It’s definitely no iMovie. That’s its beauty. It looks like it is as it’s so well laid out and organised. But the power features are insane.I get where you’re coming from actually. For me FCPX is kinda like enhanced iMovie. Great for quick simple edits but when I want something a bit more involved (especially anything that involves grading) I use DaVinci
I use it daily so I’d like to go there out of curiosityThere's a long list, let's not go there.
Even with it off, the app limits you to 30p.Stabilisation chewing up the CPU?
That’s just patently false. Easy to disprove.Nope, no "major" updates. I agree with him.
1080p from a Canon T2i is still leaps and bounds better than the hyper-processed, over-sharpened, denoised mess that you get out of the ”Pro” iPhones.The iPhone has already been an extremely capable device for video, but this kind of stuff along with USB-C recording to external drive is really causing it to make the jump to professional grade. I’d have killed to have these cameras 8 years ago instead of a Canon T2i to record my crappy independent film, haha.
This reminds me of people who would say "Photoshop is the best photo editor"DaVinci Resolve is the best video app period. So happy that they are getting better.
I record all kinds of videos on iPhone with great results. Guess my “eye” sucks or something.1080p from a Canon T2i is still leaps and bounds better than the hyper-processed, over-sharpened, denoised mess that you get out of the ”Pro” iPhones.
Camera apps are basically pointless for casual folks until Apple lets us launch a non-Apple camera app from the home screen. I bought Halide for a year but almost never ended up using it.
What? I can go to up to 60 fps on 4K. I'm on the iPhone 13 (non-pro).Just wondering why this app only shoots in 24.25 and 30 FPS. The iPhone can do 240.
You’re so cruel. Now FP developers will starve and eventually die because so many people ditch their monthly subscriptions in favor of Resolve... 😅I think we can kiss Filmic Pro with their move to a subscription model goodbye.
I used FCP up until version 7...Final Cut Studio was glorious and a precursor to what DaVinci Resolve Studio is now, and would still be using it to this day if FCPX continued along that trajectory, whilst changing stuff under the hood. But it didn't. The first versions didn't even have separate viewers...source and timeline nor could you use a broadcast monitor...basic professional features. And don't get me started on the way it forces it's 'organisation' on you. Hate that with a passion.Oh don’t get me wrong. I cut broadcast major network shows and high end music videos on fcpx. I push it to its limits. It’s definitely no iMovie. That’s its beauty. It looks like it is as it’s so well laid out and organised. But the power features are insane.
Interested why you don't also rate Resolve as a free option, or is that just an oversight?This reminds me of people who would say "Photoshop is the best photo editor"
A more accurate statement is Davinci Resolve (or Photoshop) can do just about anything you want with video (or photos). But they don't always do those tasks quickly or easily or efficiently. (There are plenty of professional photographers who never touch Photoshop!)
I tried Davinci Resolve and didn't care for it. I tried a bunch of free software too, and some were alright, but ended up going with Final Cut Pro for its ease of use, fast speed, and intuitive interface.
There is no one best software for everyone. Some people prefer command line text editors, some like the bloat but features of Microsoft Word, and some pick something between the two. You could say "MS Word can do almost anything you want a word processor to do" but I wouldn't say it is the best document writer out there.
For the record, I tried probably a dozen video editors. If you are looking for free, check out:
iMovie (used to be the best, still better than most, excellent user interface)
Olive (intuitive, great feature set, especially if you need to use Windows)
Openshot (similar, just depends which layout you prefer)
Capcut (great for quickly adding music, effects, and transitions rapidly, versus manually adding each one)
Paid: Final Cut Pro,
Adobe Premiere if you can stomach a subscription fee,
Resolve if you don't like Final Cut. I have a friend with a video studio. His take: Adobe is good if you already are used to other Adobe products, many like Resolve especially on Windows, Final Cut has a different interface from the other two that many "professional" video people reject out of hand because it's so unique (I think the way they present the timeline maybe?), but if you learn it, it's actually easier and most people who learn it find it a superior workflow but he is not going to re-learn editing at this point (he uses Adobe).
(Note: I did not try Avid)
Those are the best programs of about a dozen I tried.. the right one for you is the one that is intuitive and will easily and elegantly execute the commands you use most frequently.