Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not a good business decision if your going after market share, but maybe the app store fees are putting them off. Either way it’s their loss.
 
Not a good business decision if your going after market share, but maybe the app store fees are putting them off. Either way it’s their loss.

Mission​

Get the world’s best 3D CG technology in the hands of artists as free/open source software.

Vision​

Everyone should be free to create 3D CG content, with free technical and creative production means and free access to markets.


Kinda goes against their principals for free and open source software. Not sure what business decision you are talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
When I saw this the first thing that came to mind is that Apple asked them to stop or wouldn't provide them with the necessary information to complete it the way they intended to.
Apple is usually more than happy to get major apps ported to iPad as the available apps are a bit thin. From reading that post by one of the leaders of Blender, it sounds like this was more driven by politics within the Blender developer community.
 
business does not always revolve around money, their own mission statement talks about getting it in the most hand possible, by avoiding the most popular tablets in favour of an alternative that is by default against thier own statement.

If thier business is sharing it free it’s bad business sence.
 
business does not always revolve around money, their own mission statement talks about getting it in the most hand possible, by avoiding the most popular tablets in favour of an alternative that is by default against thier own statement.

If thier business is sharing it free it’s bad business sence.
Blender is a non profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
business does not always revolve around money, their own mission statement talks about getting it in the most hand possible, by avoiding the most popular tablets in favour of an alternative that is by default against thier own statement.

If thier business is sharing it free it’s bad business sence.
Apple clearly doesn't make it easy for non profit organisations. They always want some slice of something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
I don't think the $100 is the issue. It’s the OSS license terms for distribution for the various components in the project that are giving them headaches. VLC had these same issues.
Can’t I imagine that’s the reason as many products on the App Store include OSS software. Usual rules about acknowledgement and providing links to the source etc. it could be more about the effort to bundle everything into an iPadOS app that seems daunting vs the more Linux like android app development. Sort of square peg round hole analogy.
 
Of course unexpected, when looking at the market, but strategically might aim to kill two birds with one stone:

1. As others have pointed out already, Wacom runs on Android, and has a corporation with Blender
2. Apple might need a nudge to hand out some serious support for the iPad version.
 
Can’t I imagine that’s the reason as many products on the App Store include OSS software. Usual rules about acknowledgement and providing links to the source etc. it could be more about the effort to bundle everything into an iPadOS app that seems daunting vs the more Linux like android app development. Sort of square peg round hole analogy.
As someone posted earlier, it does seem licensing is a concern of theirs.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Ed
As someone posted earlier, it does seem licensing is a concern of theirs.

Yes, that is just vague enough to raise the question without touching on any of the possible issues.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.