And yet, you are hanging around an Applecentric forum?
Being a fanboy isn't a requirement for posting on these forums, so I suppose you'll just have to figure out a way to endure opposing opinion. You have my deepest sympathy.
It comes down to the OS. Many Mac users wont choose Windows. Thus a PC user may be able to change hardware manufacturer with ease, however we MacOS users don't have that choice.
What I am reading here is... no matter how badly Apple screws up with selling faulty hardware, you love MacOS so much that malfunctions or a system that breaks prematurely will not deter you from repeatedly purchasing products from the same manufacturer. Is that an accurate assessment of your statement?
Certainly from what I've read RE this MBP problem, and my own badcap problems, it wasn't Apple's "fault" - they were victim to parts manufacturers. Though yes, the way they have handled the issues could be better.
It is Apple's job to fix/replace/refund faulty hardware that they sold to customers. Similarly, it is NVIDIA/Foxconn/Samsung/etc's job to fix/replace/refund faulty components that they sell to Apple. Bad capacitors are not Apple's fault, but are *certainly* Apple's responsibility to fix. Apple shirks that responsibility and many of you act like it doesn't matter.
Those of us of the opinion that manufacturers should behave just a bit more honorably have a hard time understanding loyalty to a company that would throw their paying customers under the bus like that.
Then what is the alternative? You move from Compaq to Dell then to Sony then to Lenovo and you get the same software bundle - running the latest Windows.
You get a computing platform from a company that won't require years/months of litigation to rectify an issue that is their responsibility. ...or are you implying that a broken Mac is better than a thinkpad running Windows or Linux? If people do not vote with their dollars, then excepting regulation, companies who treat their customers that way are likely keep doing so.
Many of us here run Mac's because we like Mac OS X with the hardware being secondary - believe me, if Apple offered the ability (legally and supported) to run Mac OS X (without hacks, cracks etc) on generic hardware you would find a decent portion of this forum would be doing that already.
Same question as before.... are you implying that a broken Mac is better than a thinkpad running Windows or Linux?
For all the faults of Apple what keeps me from moving is the other side of the fence - having lived there and experienced the fact that for 20 years Microsoft has done nothing in the way of meaningful improvement to Windows keeps pushing me back to Mac OS X.
Microsoft are not angels, but you're certainly exaggerating when you say that they haven't done anything meaningful with Windows. It should be noted that even with Windows' huge market share, people still voted with their dollars. Win95 and Win2000 were lauded as revisions that made noticeable improvements to their software.... while WinME (and I guess Vista to some extent) were shunned. Even MS will sit and listen when people start hitting them in the pocket book. You Apple fans don't seem willing to do that.
Windows 8 under the hood looks nice but it is the same crappy win32 subsystem bolted onto an otherwise sexy kernel. It is akin to some how strapping the Mac OS X classic environment on top of a FreeBSD kernel and inheriting all the crappiness that comes form the Classic subsystem. Microsoft had the opportunity 20 years ago to release a gorgeous operating system inspired by OpenVMS but instead decided to bolt a sh-tty win32 subsystem to the kernel and here we are in 2012 with Windows 8 dependent on crappy technologies like GDI/GDI+, 20 years worth of common control and dialogues in use thus you have a complete lack of consistency when it comes to look, feel and just basic usability etc. Microsoft had their chance - they screwed the pooch and for people like me they've been giving one too many second chances.
Interesting point. Let me know if you can't see irony/hypocrisy.