Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because it works with USB-C, we now have people plugging in 5W, 10W, 20W, 25W charger and asking what does it not charge the MacBook? It is USB-C!.

If you plug the new MacBook Air into Apple's tiny 20W charger, it actually does give a pretty decent charge!
 
iphone and watch batteries are so small, it's highly unlikely to affect the lifespan of a macbook battery.
could charge only when plugged in is another option.
One problem in the concept though, which reinforces your last point: when charging other stuff, MBP becomes unusable.
 
of course..but a lot of users dont know about bettertouchtools ..so Apple should made that default but its too late now it seems

I am sure I am in the minority but I actually like the Touch Bar.
When editing in final cut pro it is super helpful (I guess I am just lazy and could learn the short cuts)
Maybe we are a silent majority...really don’t understand why people need it removed, just don’t use it, but leave the option to others who do. I really hope this doesn’t go forward, unless it’s a trade-off to get mini led display with same price tag.
 
I still don't buy the MagSafe AND USB-C charging. Given that charging is inherent in the specification for USB-C to add MagSafe would be redundant and space is too much of a premium. When they say MagSafe charging they mean MagSafe charging of peripherals. 100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: __xg__fv__c@
So I hope it’s not “MagSafe 3,” otherwise I’ll need to buy 4 or 5 new chargers at a $100 a pop. Or, in the alternative, I hope it still supports (lower speed) charging via USB-C.

All of the other computer models with proprietary chargers and USB-C support charging with both. It's nice to have the option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reason077
MagSafe's magnetic connection is obviously nice, buuuuut…

  • it's proprietary, and there was never really much of a third-party market. In contrast, there are a lot of choices for USB-C chargers of various kinds.
  • it's only on one side. You can charge a modern MBP (except for the low-end 13-inch :( ) from any of the four ports, on either side!
  • it only charges. In contrast, the USB-C port can be combined with a hub or dock, so you can hook up charging, displays, accessories, networking, etc. all with one cable.

I would like to see a magnetic variant of USB-C, but other than that, going back to MagSafe is not at all a clear win.
That’s what I’m hopping for: Apple’s version of TB/USB C cable with magnetic functionality of magsafe, without any restraint to usability of port (suspect no charger will be included though...)
 
I still don't buy the MagSafe AND USB-C charging. Given that charging is inherent in the specification for USB-C to add MagSafe would be redundant and space is too much of a premium. When they say MagSafe charging they mean MagSafe charging of peripherals. 100%

They got back space with M1.
 
How much you wanna Bet?

Touch Bar going away because of Future Touch Screens

I will bet any amount of money that all Mac Laptops including the iMac will be touchscreen.

The Mac Pro will eventually be dropped because of no touch screen.

The future for MacBooks is to resemble the touch Microsoft Surface Pro's in every way.

No More Mac Pro. Not enough people buy them and they wont be converted to TOUCH.

I'll take a touch interface when it works like The Expanse or Minority Report.

Until then, all I've used it for on Windows PCs is sliding up to unlock it. If the interface doesn't work as well as an iPad Pro with a stylus, it's a huge step back for no godly reason.
 
All of the other computer models with proprietary chargers and USB-C support charging with both. It's nice to have the option.
What exactly is "all of the other computer models"? How many are we talking about? And how many of those need a non-USB-PD solution because they draw > 100W at max CPU?
 
Also, a bunch of you keep telling us how "epically stupid" Apple was for dropping a handful of single use ports and adopting four ports that can connect your laptop to practically anything you can imagine, so why now would you suggest they can't do things that someone might consider "epically stupid"?

Darn! You've got me there.

I can only hope that the fact that the phantom port stealer was largely kept away from the iMac, Mini and Pro is a sign that wiser heads have prevailed.
 
I didn't say it can't be that, if charging is your sole concern. I mean magnetic USB-C charge cables exist already.

But that seems like a very precarious connection at the best of times, for transmitting data.
Agree potencial disruption on data could be catastrophic, but when you’re charging, data doesn’t matter. So cable offer in the box is for charging; for data you’ll need to get a TB cable...seems a good compromise: get the magnetic feature of old magsafe without compromising the usability of the TB/USB C ports.
 
I still don't buy the MagSafe AND USB-C charging. Given that charging is inherent in the specification for USB-C to add MagSafe would be redundant and space is too much of a premium. When they say MagSafe charging they mean MagSafe charging of peripherals. 100%

No, if you read the Bloomberg article it's pretty clear that it's MagSafe charging of the MacBook itself. Similar connector to the original MagSafe 1/2.
 
Yeah, it would acceptable if I could use existing usb-c chargers but with a new cable. Somehow I doubt it.
TB/UsbC plug Cable (power only) with built in magnetic feature of old magsafe, but no charger in the box, seems more likely to me.
 
What exactly is "all of the other computer models"? How many are we talking about? And how many of those need a non-USB-PD solution because they draw > 100W at max CPU?

Dell Precision 7750.

There are plenty of gaming laptops that have 180+ charging bricks. And I do mean brick.

We have one of these:

 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Agree potencial disruption on data could be catastrophic, but when you’re charging, data doesn’t matter. So cable offer in the box is for charging; for data you’ll need to get a TB cable...seems a good compromise: get the magnetic feature of old magsafe without compromising the usability of the TB/USB C ports.
That would literally just be changing the cable they ship. The one they ship now is realistically only a charge cable, but it happens to do USB2.0 data too (I dont think a verified USB-C charge cable without USB2.0 compatibility exists, it has to carry data of some form, AFAIK)

I'm not saying that isn't what will happen, but that very much isn't what the "rumour" states. Then again, this rumour is also from the same company that published: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...ny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
Dell Precision 7750.

There are plenty of gaming laptops that have 180+ charging bricks. And I do mean brick.

We have one of these:

Right.. so laptops with power hungry CPU's and GPUs, that weigh so much they are essentially "portable desktops". Yeah, I had one of those for work (not marketed as a gaming machine but same basic concept) a decade and a half ago.

They have a 180w+ brick because they're about as power efficient as a fiat driven up a hill by a fat guy.

Apple laptops have used <100W chargers, literally forever, and USB-C provides for 100W charing. One of the key benefits of their own CPU/GPU silicon is to be more power efficient. So, the comparison to some fat PC space heater pretending to be a laptop is kind of ridiculous.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Right.. so laptops with power hungry CPU's and GPUs, that weigh so much they are essentially "portable desktops". Yeah, I had one of those for work (not marketed as a gaming machine but same basic concept) a decade and a half ago.

They have a 180w+ brick because they're about as power efficient as a fiat driven up a hill by a fat guy.

Apple laptops have used <100W chargers, literally forever, and USB-C provides for 100W charing. One of the key benefits of their own CPU/GPU silicon is to be more power efficient. So, the comparison to some fat PC space heater pretending to be a laptop is kind of ridiculous.

What I am saying is that there is plenty of precedent for charging via proprietary brick AND via USB-C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy and Reason077
So what prices do people expect these to be at base? Is 16gb likely to be standard?

I don't think that there's anyway to know. Apple could give us a gift or they could be the grinch. I don't actually really care and I imagine a lot of Apple customers don't either. If they do 8, 12, 16 performance cores, it's going to blow away everything else in the market.
 
I'd love for Apple to integrate Face ID into their laptops. I've never had success using Touch ID, so really prefer Face ID. But, in truth, it's a real first world problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reason077
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.