Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
ddrueckhammer said:
My girlfriend has a Denison icelink in her car which while ok still isn't as elegant as a wireless solution.

It looks like bluetooth wireless playback in the car is already available check out this link from Crutchfield's Digital Drive-Thru site:

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-adzgQeqQxKb/cgi-bin/tools/DigitalDriveThru/Solution.asp?tab=6#TabTop

It looks like the Scosche IPBCK Bluetooth system can interface with an iPod using bluetooth and connects to your car stereo using aux-in or with a USA SPEC Auxiliary Interface which changes a CD changer port on the back of the head unit into an aux in...

Personally, I think that bluetooth is useless for:

1. Wireless Headphones-This is just something to lose, and more batteries to buy or worse another device to charge...
2. Wireless Synching- Is it really that hard to dig out a cable to synch with? Also, the speed will be too slow for my large library...

CD players have been in cars for over ten years. If auto manufacturers start putting bluetooth in their new cars which can interface with an iPod, I think this is the next killer app and many people will want it. However, this is very dependent on the sound quality that bluetooth can deliver.


Holy #$%!^. Thank you so much! I went on to their 'What fits my car" section and got just what I needed! Many thanks!! Now maybe that new VW GTI I just bought will be even more "pimpin'"!
 
have your iPod connect to your phone

For the iPod user that want a lots of tunes plus his cell phone bluetooth would be great.

Apple just needs to add a mic to the earbuds and present a bluetooth headset profile to the phone.

You listen to your tunes then when a call comes in the iPod mutes when you press the button on the earbuds. When you end the call the tunes starts back up.

Nice thing about doing it this way is that you can use it with any carrier where an iTunes phone only works with one carrier.

In addition the iPod could connect to the Internet using the modem profile. With a connection to .Mac you could sync information with your Mac when your on the road.
 
I am very interested in built-in wireless for cars. That will not necessarily be THE must have feature, but it's definitely up there. Not only is in cool and convenient, but it's safer with less wires for drivers. :)

BT headphones are a waste, and i highly doubt Apple would use that technology in headphones. If it ain't broke, don't fix it right? People like wired headphones and not needing to charge them or replace batteries, so why make things more expensive and more of a hassle?

In terms of the syncing, it was mentioned before about how difficult is it to break out a cable. While i agree with this philosophy for syncing to a computer, what about syncing to a stereo? I mean it's the same function basically as to a car. What if now you didn't need a wire to connect your iPod to a stereo system, but maybe just a little adapter to go in the stereo. Your iPod is now transformed into a remote control of sorts. You can change the volume, songs, whatever from your hand and have the data transfer to the stereo say 20 feet away. That would be worth upgrading to.
 
Stridder44 said:
Holy #$%!^. Thank you so much! I went on to their 'What fits my car" section and got just what I needed! Many thanks!! Now maybe that new VW GTI I just bought will be even more "pimpin'"!

If you get the bluetooth interface please let me know how it works. I might be interested if the music sounds good. Minimally you can get that aux-in box and put it in your glovebox...

Also, I think Crutchfield should return it no problem if it doesn't work for you...
 
about bluetooth-

Jobs is right about it for headphones. for earbuds: where's the battery, how do you not lose them? and big headphones.... they're already way bigger than an ipod (and hence not that popluar for use with an ipod) so wires aren't as big a deal. Then you've got batteries hanging on your head, and also, with headphones that big, there are already bluetooth add ons that don't add much size to the ipod.

But the car market-that makes more sense. Better than an FM thingy by far, very elegant, and everybody knows how awful wires are in a crowded car from when we used CDs and the tape deck thing and a cd charger. only two problems: 1) cars dont' have bluetooth 2)bluetooth is a standard not controled by apple. Read: not closed system. your nifty steering wheel control on your new beamer suddenly just needs new software to work with other players, and hence other music stores, and hence....
 
Bluetooth...

I would take a tiny little bluetooth remote that could:

1. Change tracks/adjust volume/etc
2. Tune in radio stations

Other than this...useless
 
Meh, still not cool enough to make me want to ditch my 3G 20GB iPod just yet. Give me a full screen, true video iPod with higher res and I might think about it.

And furthermore, does bluetooth come in any other colors? :confused: :cool:
 
qtip919 said:
Bluetooth...

I would take a tiny little bluetooth remote that could:

1. Change tracks/adjust volume/etc
2. Tune in radio stations

Other than this...useless

i agree with you that the remote would be very hot, and i think that's a really cool feature that some have looked past. it's a remote dock...w/out the dock.

h/o, i disagree, and would say that the in car bluetooth would be really sexy. fm sucks, cables are cumbersome...bluetooth w/ good bandwidth would be awesome.
 
tny said:
There aren't any *solidly confirmed* health risks for cell phone exposure, let alone bluetooth use. There are only a handful of studies that suggest that even low levels of non-ionizing RF may, if they are focused in a small area (i.e., by a cell phone antenna), cause biological effects. The jury is still out.

That said, the bluetooth signal is weaker than the cellphone signal, so I would assume there is less risk (whatever the actual level of risk is).

Cool thanks for the info! Good to know.
 
ahh who cares...nothing big, I suppose I can do without it until the true video iPod is released. But my mother still needs that new macbook!
 
Just a thought, perhaps a dumb one, but what about using 802.11g technology for the iPods? Fast, etc, could connect to web...
 
Headphones

You guys are all missing the point. They're not going to exclusively offer bluetooth headphones. They're going to still have a headphone port. If they only allowed bluetooth headphones, people would be in an uproar, like you.

This is the single product I want them to release. I have cash to burn and want an iMac, but I don't have that much. This would be perfect.
 
ddcrandall said:
You guys are all missing the point. They're not going to exclusively offer bluetooth headphones. They're going to still have a headphone port. If they only allowed bluetooth headphones, people would be in an uproar, like you.

This is the single product I want them to release. I have cash to burn and want an iMac, but I don't have that much. This would be perfect.

NONONONO the new iBook (macBook) would be perfect, save your money kid, get that iMac.................bluetooth, whatever......

the video iPod - now that is something to talk about, but this bluetooth stuff isnt worthwhile news, to me anyway.......the new iBook is where apple should be looking, the current ones are paper weights
 
amac4me said:
We all know what happens when Jobs denies a product. Case in point ... the Video capable iPod

The iPod with video is not a "dedicated video playback device". Therefore it's release did not nullify his previous statement.

Jobs discussed video on handheld devices - such as a Video iPod. He admits that you can download videos from iTunes as well as Video Podcasts, but is uncertain if people will buy a dedicated video playback device. "So far they haven't. No one has been successful with that yet."

And even if they did, he said no one has been successful with it yet. Doesn't mean that Apple couldn't release one and be successful with it in the future.
 
I, for one, am very excited about the possibility (and eventual inevitability) of bluetooth technology in upcoming iPod models. I think Apple would only release bluetooth headphones if the quality was there. As seen with the release of the Hi-Fi, they're keeping audiophiles in mind. Rock on Apple, let's see what you've got for us!!

mr
 
lanray said:
Just a thought, perhaps a dumb one, but what about using 802.11g technology for the iPods? Fast, etc, could connect to web...


Good point...any takers? I wonder how easy it would be to fit it into an iPod...
 
stuff magazine? what the heck do they know about upcoming apple products? :confused:

i doubt there'll be a BT ipod...unless apple's found a way to make them sound half-decent. all the ones i've heard so far are AWFUL.
 
Spock said:
I agree, the wires are not bad at all, I think I would lose Wireless headphones anyway! This would be a bad move I think Steve has said in the past You cant take away a feature once its in place I dont like the idea

iPod firewire synching?

firewire800 from the PowerBook? (and don't give me, because it is not called the PowerBook no more)
 
The guts of a shuffle would just about fit into the form factor of those Bluetooth headsets, without the transmission quality issues or a separate iPod to carry around.
 
Whatever....just show us something.

I've been pretty pissed off at apple for not doing anything for their 30th and not even making a public announcement. They didn't even post up something on their website. How pathetic.
 
iMeowbot said:
The guts of a shuffle would just about fit into the form factor of those Bluetooth headsets, without the transmission quality issues or a separate iPod to carry around.

they could expand this idea so much.

imagine good quality bluetooth studio headphones with a shuffle inside of it.

and then a "powerglove" like control system for you. that would be cool.
 
The Ultimate Presentation Tool

This is the ultimate presentation tool:

1 - Make presentation on Mac or PC with Keynote or PowerPoint.

2 - Save it to the wireless iPod.

3 - Carry the wireless iPod to the presentation tool, boot Mac OS X from it and use it as a wireless remote to perform the videopresentation using a wireless videoprojector.

No cables involved. No computer involved.

Apple will sell millions of these to the corporate, education and domestic markets. The halo effect will be tremendous for the Mac market share!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.