Honestly, all I would really want in the S8 would be a 3-5 day battery life, like the FitBit (5-7 days) or the Galaxy Watches (3-5 days). It would allow me to have weekend trips (2 nights) without taking my charger.
Or, hear me out, people could not upgrade every year. I know that's unthinkable but it might just be an option. People who want to upgrade or purchase or replace a lost/damaged watch then would have an option without waiting another year or buying 'older' technology.Maybe they should consider 2 year releases at this point. These yearly updates are pointless.
That's interesting: which competitors? If others can implement it then Apple surely can too. The technology is there. As others have noted, the S7 was an underwhelming update - if there is no new health metric in the S8 it's going to be quite hard to muster much interestNo new health sensor for a second year would be a bummer, given that body temperature is a feature that Apple Watch competitors have implemented recently. Other than a new SoC, I can't think of anything major that can happen to the S8 (maybe a longer battery life, but Apple seems to have a hard time to give anything over 18h battery life)
Interesting ideaThe one senseor I'd really love is a body hydration sensor. You can get them so the technology exists. It's something I seem to struggle with with working from home and I'd love to see apples take on it. Building it natively into Health would be genuinely useful for me. Possibly alone in this.
A non-contact thermometer is a way to take someone’s temperature without touching them. Non- contact infrared thermometers (NCIT) are as accurate as contact thermometers and are low cost. Training is easier and the thermometers are easier to use and do not need as much work to set them correctly.Forehead thermometers are often dismissed as probably the least satisfactory technological body temperature measurement technique. I hope they avoid them.
Apple is rumored to be working on a method for non-invasively monitoring blood glucose levels using optical sensors as well, potentially offering sufferers of diabetes a way to manage their condition that would be much easier, as it wouldn't require puncturing the skin.
A non-contact thermometer is a way to take someone’s temperature without touching them. Non- contact infrared thermometers (NCIT) are as accurate as contact thermometers and are low cost. Training is easier and the thermometers are easier to use and do not need as much work to set them correctly.
Source: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/24857/cdc_24857_DS1.pdf
Research has shown that, when used correctly, infrared or no-contact thermometers are just as accurate as oral or rectal thermometers.
Source: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/are-infrared-thermometers-accurate/
Conclusions: The non-contact infrared thermometer is a reliable, comfortable and accurate option for measurement of temperature and is very useful for the screening of fever in the paediatric population.
Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21651612/
It is, but wouldn't necessarily be so with a watch. The watch IS touching and creates some heat in itself which could skew results. That may negate the "when used correctly".A non-contact thermometer is a way to take someone’s temperature without touching them. Non- contact infrared thermometers (NCIT) are as accurate as contact thermometers and are low cost. Training is easier and the thermometers are easier to use and do not need as much work to set them correctly.
Source: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/24857/cdc_24857_DS1.pdf
Research has shown that, when used correctly, infrared or no-contact thermometers are just as accurate as oral or rectal thermometers.
Source: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/are-infrared-thermometers-accurate/
Conclusions: The non-contact infrared thermometer is a reliable, comfortable and accurate option for measurement of temperature and is very useful for the screening of fever in the paediatric population.
Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21651612/
The idea I posted was to use an infrared sensor inside the iPhone's Face ID sensor complex.It is, but wouldn't necessarily be so with a watch. The watch IS touching and creates some heat in itself which could skew results. That may negate the "when used correctly".
To which the FDA advice would seem to apply. Of course, they could include orientation and distance detection and other measures to ensure it only operates within its design envelope.The idea I posted was to use an infrared sensor inside the iPhone's Face ID sensor complex.
Don’t hold your breath. It’s not coming for years.2 weeks ago my wife (aged 30) was diagnosed T1DM that requires intense glucose monitoring, we've been using FreeStyle Libre and it works just fine. That being said, glucose monitoring from Apple Watch can be a game changer considering the non-invasive and (probably) continuous nature, not to mention it can be way more affordable (as opposed to the $1,000 / year for the cost of Libre sensors).
We don't know that for certain. These are only leaks/ rumoursDon’t hold your breath. It’s not coming for years.
ha, didn't realize that. sad sad.*keyboard only available in english
They will have to buy up a medical research lab and start inventing diseases to put in a sensor to monitor. It's part of the 'end-to-end control of everything' plan.So no body temperature sensor, then what will this watch even have?? Will it be another lackluster launch like the 7?