Lack of evidence is not evidence.
Exactly. Thank you. As a devout believer I say this all the time to nonbelievers. Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. The lack of evidence always suggests some truth.
Lack of evidence is not evidence.
Lack of evidence is not evidence.
They were a month out from bankruptcy. I think we can categorize charity as a luxury. As for the second portion of your statement, product(RED) and extreme environmental awareness in their products makes for philanthropy. Accommodations and kind gestures to victims in Japan during the earthquakes mass for philanthropy. Continued support in the iTunes stores to take donations for catastrophes is evidence of philanthropy.
Keep telling yourself that. You pretend to know somebody just by reading about him in the news.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)
Wow. The single most valuable company in the world (which means it pays more taxes to welfare than anything/anyone else on the planet) can still be criticized for not donating to charity?! Steve jobs invented the modern computer, smart phone, and modern tablet that have all gone to place more jobs (not to mention apple itself) than any other human in history. I'd say he has given more to our livelihood than anyone! Tread lightly lest atlas shrug!
How much dough are these bastards writing the articles donating? Probably nothing, the dirty, worthless piss-ants.
So?
It doesn't really matter one way or another to consumers. Apple gear, however DOES matter. That's all that really matters. Charity doesn't generate profit, sales, or great products. It's nice. But it's a lucky bonus.
The very quality you criticize about Jobs, helped create three of the products in your sig. I assume you're satisfied with your purchases, are you not? (since you're advertising them.) Perhaps you owe him a word of thanks instead, or at least an acknowledgement that he made great things, and did it perfectly legally.
It's quite likely (if not absolutely true) that if Steve Jobs were any other way, had his personality and attitude been any different, you wouldn't be enjoying those products today (and would probably using something inferior.)
Bono has an opinion about something?
Stop the presses.
Stops people ragging him about not paying his taxes i suppose.
When the money is yours and you earned it.. you can do what ever you want with it. Everybody should give half of their bank account to charity before pointing out fingers, not that easy is it!? Most of the people on here complaining probably don't even give a dollar to a beggar on the street. Everybody should do their part before complaining or pointing out fingers.
Who cares whether or not he gave to charity? How is this topic even germane to anything?
What on earth does that have to do with Apple products? The man's done enough in his lifetime, he probably gave to some charity or another anonymously, we don't know how much or when, nor does it really matter.
Charity is just that. Charity. Optional. Some people give, some don't. It's not exactly a requirement, nor is it a prerequisite for sainthood. Steve Jobs' ultimate legacy (and destination when the time comes) is really no one's business, but it should be clear that he's done enough good in his life that to push criticism even further and require even more is kind of ludicrous.
With 8 Billion dollars, he could give 7 Billion of it to different charitites and still live VERY comfortably!
Your post is the most foolish thing I've read. You defend all things Apple and Jobs tooth and nail...without any independent though, empathy, or understanding. You seriously believe that Apple sponsored philanthropy could result in diminishing the products you prize so much(and more than people obviously)?
Thats a delusional and immoral perception. So, $78 Billion Dollars in liquid assets is a success (by your rational)? How about $70 Billion of liquid assets and a couple hundred million lives saved? Apple is in the position (and has been since the early 2000's) to have both levels of success. The delusion and bias represented in your post is mind blowing ignorance.
With 8 Billion dollars, he could give 7 Billion of it to different charitites and still live VERY comfortably!
Going by the Book, Jobs is hardly a good christian though.
How is this topic even germane to anything?
Exactly. Thank you. As a devout believer I say this all the time to nonbelievers. Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. The lack of evidence always suggests some truth.
Your post is the most foolish thing I've read. You defend all things Apple and Jobs tooth and nail...without any independent though, empathy, or understanding. You seriously believe that Apple sponsored philanthropy could result in diminishing the products you prize so much(and more than people obviously)?
Thats a delusional and immoral perception. So, $78 Billion Dollars in liquid assets is a success (by your rational)? How about $70 Billion of liquid assets and a couple hundred million lives saved? Apple is in the position (and has been since the early 2000's) to have both levels of success. The delusion and bias represented in your post is mind blowing ignorance.
Obviously you care since you're defending Steve Jobs.
And who (but you) made any correlation between charity and products?
You're absurd sometimes... really.
This is my biggest criticism of Steve Jobs. His continued lack of philanthropic efforts is appalling given how richly he is blessed. If Apple is your focus and legacy, God help you. Millions starve and are afflicted by disease every day, and he's going to sit on his wealth and rest on some laurel of (Red) Product placement and his superfluous adherence to Buddhism? (Real Buddhists are some of the most compassionate and self sacrificing people on this earth)
This jolly back patting is ridiculous, Steve doesn't deserve an ounce of praise or concern.