Just when you thought Americans couldn't get any fatter...
http://money.cnn.com/2005/03/28/news/midcaps/burgerking_breakfast/index.htm
http://money.cnn.com/2005/03/28/news/midcaps/burgerking_breakfast/index.htm
edesignuk said:Yay Burger King
WTF is wrong with them. At least McDonalds seem to be going in a better direction.
iindigo said:Well I don't mind burger joints getting a little more healthy, but I don't want them to go all, "OMG ITS A CALORIE EVERYONE FREEZE!!!", or "FAT, COME OUT - WE'VE GOT THE ENTIRE PLACE SURROUNDED". I tend to like my burgers just the way they are...
DavidLeblond said:
apple2991 said:I think the problem here is choices--it has come to the point where many people simply do not have the time to eat three square, somewhat rounded meals a day. Most people are lucky to get one at dinner. And these fast-foot establishments, although they have no legal obligation to the public to serve even remotely healthy foods should only be encouraged to make their food--known to be a staple of American life (over 25% of the American adult population eats a fast-food meal everyday)--as healthy as possible, to the benefit of society.
That's not to say they need to start serving brussel sprouts and tofu burgers, but do their meals really need to include 750 calorie breakfast sandwiches? And, sadly, most Americans don't have the time or motivation to learn what is in the food that is so convenient and easy for them to purchase--or how unhealthy it may be.
But, as I said, the problem is choices. I have no problem with anybody stuffing their face with whatever they so choose, but I think we should also see fast-food restaurants offer more healthy alternatives. It's not so much an issue of Burger King serving this particular sandwich, it's an issue of them not having anything else.
And I don't really see why this can be considered healthy just because it's veggie - It's still served in crap bread and with lots of mayo...apple2991 said:The only healthy choice on Burger King's menu (aside from those OH-so wonderful salads).
MongoTheGeek said:I saw a table split one. I almost killed off the 3#er. I hit the pickle relish at the bottom (Hate pickles. Eating the 1 1/2 on top of the beast was bad enough)
A woman recently ate the 6#
I've been hankering for a crossainwich recently. Maybe I should get one of these instead.
DavidLeblond said:
crap freakboy said:quote from link "100-pound woman became the first person to win the Denny's Beer Barrel Pub challenge when 19-year-old Kate Stelnick of Princeton, New Jersey, downed a six-pound Denny's "96er" hamburger and five pounds of fixins' in 2 hours and 54 minutes, just shy of the three-hour time limit. For her trouble, Ms. Stelnick got a special certificate, a T-shirt, and other prizes, as well as having her tab for the $23.95 burger picked up by the house."
Don't know what to say besides "FAT COW!"
well besides ay least she's still a Ms. and probably will still stay one, 'keep those genes to yourself madam!', and no I'm not a 8 stone vegan hippie.
I'm guessing "bulemic" is more apt than "fat cow". Not sure how, otherwise, a 100-lb person could eat 11 pounds of food in under 3 hours.DavidLeblond said:100 lbs is a fat cow? If she can eat a 6 lb hamburger and still be 100lbs, I'd say she has some damn fine genes myself.
jsw said:I'm guessing "bulemic" is more apt than "fat cow". Not sure how, otherwise, a 100-lb person could eat 11 pounds of food in under 3 hours.
apple2991 said:The only healthy choice on Burger King's menu (aside from those OH-so wonderful salads).
shortyjj said:I saw this commercial last night, and LOVED the new BK "mascot". It's definitely memorable, though I'm not sure it does much to help sell fast food...
ziwi said:Too much for me. It seems that the majority of people don't care because they know that there are 'pills' one can take to counter act the effects of being overweight - cholesterol, high blood pressure, etc. so the enjoyment of the monster sandwich adds some pounds, but nothing that a spam email doesn't make you think you could lose in 5 minutes![]()