Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And the engineers who make those cars will agree that both are capable of serving its own designated customers.

Or even more fundamentally, both are completely capable of getting ANYONE to the grocery store, to the airport, around town, and to do what a normal consumer wants to do, LOL
 
Or even more fundamentally, both are completely capable of getting ANYONE to the grocery store, to the airport, around town, and to do what a normal consumer wants to do, LOL

EXACTLY! I just finished making a website for a client of mine, and it worked just fine ;)
 
EXACTLY! I just finished making a website for a client of mine, and it worked just fine ;)

Surely the website must be underpowered and lag. They say the power of this laptop is like a 2011 computer.. and there was no internet or web pages then. ;-)
 
Err... before SSDs became common-place every computer stalled like crazy.

Seriously, as a software dev I remember the day I upgrade to an Intel x25m back in 2008 or so. Had an 8 core 3.33 x-treme desktop, a 15k drive, and was used to waiting probably 3-4 seconds every time I attempted to switch applications, 5+ second app boot times. That all virtually disappeared in an instant. *That* kind of waiting is absolutely nothing like the graphical rendering stutters a ULV IGP pushing 5+ million virtual pixels out.

The MacBooks problem is not SSD though :).

Either way, lagging on a system in 2015 that costs as much as the MB is not acceptable . We even expect out mobile phones to be lag free.

----------

Surely the website must be underpowered and lag. They say the power of this laptop is like a 2011 computer.. and there was no internet or web pages then. ;-)

You believe websites are run of portable laptops ? :rolleyes:
 
I agree with MH01, it isn't acceptable to just cast aside people's complaints about the laggy UI and say "oh but it happens on the MBPr too! So it's no problem!" Nope, that doesn't make it acceptable. When an ipad air 2 half the price of the Macbook has a considerably smoother UI we have a problem. When you pay this much for a machine you shouldn't have to suffer lag. It was a problem on the MBPr 13" and it's even worse with this one, Apple need to work on it. I think a lot of people here are just trying to make excuses for the Macbook and defending their purchase though so I understand.

Show me a video where the UI is actually smooth on the Macbook and I will believe you that it doesn't lag. Opening folders with a large number of apps, switching between 1080p video and other apps by swiping, other animations etc. The experience deteriorates doing any of these and brings the whole premium feel down. I've never seen such a video, even the ones claiming to be proof that they don't lag have lag.
 
I love buyers remorse. Thats why I just spent $2401 on an underpowered phaptop :D

Srsly though, I'm coming from an anti-glare mid 2010 MBP 15 inch. I think i'll survive. The only thing i'm sweating is the smaller screen.
 
I'd think a lot of the UI lag is on the software side rather than hardware though when even an iPad can run 1080p video without a sweat, no?

I don't have my rMB yet but when I do get it I'll be playing around with it and will decide between it or upgrading my 2012 15" rMBP.
 
I agree with MH01, it isn't acceptable to just cast aside people's complaints about the laggy UI and say "oh but it happens on the MBPr too! So it's no problem!" Nope, that doesn't make it acceptable. When an ipad air 2 half the price of the Macbook has a considerably smoother UI we have a problem. When you pay this much for a machine you shouldn't have to suffer lag. It was a problem on the MBPr 13" and it's even worse with this one, Apple need to work on it. I think a lot of people here are just trying to make excuses for the Macbook and defending their purchase though so I understand.

Show me a video where the UI is actually smooth on the Macbook and I will believe you that it doesn't lag. Opening folders with a large number of apps, switching between 1080p video and other apps by swiping, other animations etc. The experience deteriorates doing any of these and brings the whole premium feel down. I've never seen such a video, even the ones claiming to be proof that they don't lag have lag.

I agree any of the macs (with retina display) would lag doing that.
 
I agree any of the macs (with retina display) would lag doing that.

Which is unacceptable, and this one does it worse. I compared while I was at the Apple Store. Software problem or hardware problem Apple must do something about it.
 
A car that stalls while driving is a safety issue. I know, I've experienced it. Not even remotely comparable.

A better car analogy might be turbo lag. Some expensive performance cars are sluggish off the line until the turbo spins up, then it takes off like a rocket a few seconds later. Still has a good 0-60 time and still gets you to the grocery store, but not nearly as pleasing to drive as a car with linear acceleration (which turbo configurations can achieve). But luckily we aren't so invested into ecosystems with cars.
 
I agree with MH01, it isn't acceptable to just cast aside people's complaints about the laggy UI and say "oh but it happens on the MBPr too! So it's no problem!" Nope, that doesn't make it acceptable. When an ipad air 2 half the price of the Macbook has a considerably smoother UI we have a problem. When you pay this much for a machine you shouldn't have to suffer lag. It was a problem on the MBPr 13" and it's even worse with this one, Apple need to work on it. I think a lot of people here are just trying to make excuses for the Macbook and defending their purchase though so I understand.

Show me a video where the UI is actually smooth on the Macbook and I will believe you that it doesn't lag. Opening folders with a large number of apps, switching between 1080p video and other apps by swiping, other animations etc. The experience deteriorates doing any of these and brings the whole premium feel down. I've never seen such a video, even the ones claiming to be proof that they don't lag have lag.

Here's one?

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/21268907/
 
Which is unacceptable, and this one does it worse. I compared while I was at the Apple Store. Software problem or hardware problem Apple must do something about it.

it is the exact same as the 13" rMBP. I owned both side by side for a few weeks.
 
nothing dramatic about that video. That is not normal.

Got bad news for you. My brand new 2015 13" rMBP 2.9 has the same stall when switching desktops. I didn't really see any other issues in that video, and I certainly didn't see anything rendering the computer unusable as some are saying.

Maybe Apple's marriage of software and hardware isn't as happy as everyone says? How hard is it to write software than runs well on hardware you spec? Maybe they should avoid doing things that look crappy on most of their hardware. It doesn't affect usability but it sure affects the experience and perception.
 
Got bad news for you. My brand new 2015 13" rMBP 2.9 has the same stall when switching desktops. I didn't really see any other issues in that video, and I certainly didn't see anything rendering the computer unusable as some are saying.

Maybe Apple's marriage of software and hardware isn't as happy as everyone says? How hard is it to write software than runs well on hardware you spec? Maybe they should avoid doing things that look crappy on most of their hardware. It doesn't affect usability but it sure affects the experience and perception.

Were you watching this video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3ia3l0oWbY

My current macbook does not have this lag, but 2 others did. It is not normal by any means. If you proclaim that as normal, bad news....something is not right. I have two videos on youtube from two different rMB with very different UI lag.
 
This is the video I watched that claims "no lag" but has lag: http://youtu.be/uaZ8Z8OxQtc

----------


He isn't opening folders with lots of applications in that vid, which is a good way to see the lag.

----------

it is the exact same as the 13" rMBP. I owned both side by side for a few weeks.

It is unacceptable for a machine that costs this much. The ipad air 2 has a considerably smoother UI.
 
Were you watching this video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3ia3l0oWbY

My current macbook does not have this lag, but 2 others did. It is not normal by any means. If you proclaim that as normal, bad news....something is not right. I have two videos on youtube from two different rMB with very different UI lag.

Same settings as far as scaling, transparency, etc.? That can make a significant difference.
 
Agree as well. I have no idea where the lag issues come from, maybe there is a gulf of difference with the 1.2 vs 1.1, but I can;
- use safari or chrome
- view videos
- do word processing
- prepare highly graphically intensive presentations
- work with large spreadsheets
- use a VNC client from anywhere to my workplace
- perform complex statistical calculations
- work on photos in Lightroom, Photoshop and pixelmator

Is it the fastest machine on the planet? No. Can I induce lag in the UI? Yes, but I can induce the same on my rMBP in the same scenarios, and it is nowhere near as portable.

Anyway to each their own. If you think the air is superior than buy one. Me, I am happy with my MacBook, it has confined my rMBP to the desk as I can bring this machine everywhere.

What more can I want?

I bought and returned the 1.3. Why? Yes, I agree with you that the MB can perform the tasks you mentioned above. But there is A CATCH. You can't do all these tasks at once. The MB is very poor in multitasking. In personal tests, the 1.3 MB is hyper lag and slow during my stress tests, where I ran Parallel Win 7 (with Excel + Word running) + Keynote + Safari + iTunes + Photoshop + Statistical software simultaneously.

My 2013 MBA performs these tasks without a single glitch. If you just run one app at a time, there is no significant different in performance between MB and MBA. For example, with a mere 1-2 background apps running, MB and MBA take the same amount of time to execute a photoshop task. However, when there are heaps of background apps, the MB struggles to catch up with MBA's superior performance.

I am not remorse as I can return it to Apple. I am just disappointed that the MB, to me, is an underpowered machine that suits for very basic single task oriented computing. As much as I love MB's superior screen and sexy footprint, I have to let it go. Meet the MB again in V2 or V3.

My verdict: Get the MB if you don't need to do extreme multitasking computing.
 
I bought and returned the 1.3. Why? Yes, I agree with you that the MB can perform the tasks you mentioned above. But there is A CATCH. You can't do all these tasks at once. The MB is very poor in multitasking. In personal tests, the 1.3 MB is hyper lag and slow during my stress tests, where I ran Parallel Win 7 (with Excel + Word running) + Keynote + Safari + iTunes + Photoshop + Statistical software simultaneously.

My 2013 MBA performs these tasks without a single glitch. If you just run one app at a time, there is no significant different in performance between MB and MBA. For example, with a mere 1-2 background apps running, MB and MBA take the same amount of time to execute a photoshop task. However, when there are heaps of background apps, the MB struggles to catch up with MBA's superior performance.

I am not remorse as I can return it to Apple. I am just disappointed that the MB, to me, is an underpowered machine that suits for very basic single task oriented computing. As much as I love MB's superior screen and sexy footprint, I have to let it go. Meet the MB again in V2 or V3.

My verdict: Get the MB if you don't need to do extreme multitasking computing.

Then you might as well buy an ipad air 2 which has a considerably a smoother user interface and buy a keyboard for it. And jailbreak it for multitasking.
 
Either way, lagging on a system in 2015 that costs as much as the MB is not acceptable . We even expect out mobile phones to be lag free.


I don't own a MB, but have played with one on a few occasions at an Apple store. To me the UI smoothness is pretty close to my late 2014 13" rMBP.

All Apple retina laptops have lag - it's been this way since the first 15" rMBP (which I think it much better now but the difference is still obvious when using an MBA back to back). HiDPI is a crazy amount of work... depending on what "looks like" it upscales to 4x that resolution in the background, then it downscales it to the target appearance. If you try any of these virtual resolutions in non-HiDPI lag is a non-issue.
 
I don't own a MB, but have played with one on a few occasions at an Apple store. To me the UI smoothness is pretty close to my late 2014 13" rMBP.

...

lag is a non-issue.

Exactly.

My 2012 rMBP 15" is laggy and stuttery, compared to this 2015 rMB. The new MacBook is fast and responsive.

Which does tell me I need to do a bit of fine-tuning on my rMBP, but nevertheless, the response on the rMB is just fine.

My one-liner view of it is: there is no lag.
 
I don't own a MB, but have played with one on a few occasions at an Apple store. To me the UI smoothness is pretty close to my late 2014 13" rMBP.

All Apple retina laptops have lag - it's been this way since the first 15" rMBP (which I think it much better now but the difference is still obvious when using an MBA back to back). HiDPI is a crazy amount of work... depending on what "looks like" it upscales to 4x that resolution in the background, then it downscales it to the target appearance. If you try any of these virtual resolutions in non-HiDPI lag is a non-issue.

That is true. I have a 15 retina and I do experience the graphic lag, mind you it is not ideal, though apple has improved it since it first launched . And to be honest i forgot about the lag, as I had huge issues with the wifi for a long time. All working fine now, but it took quite a few software updates to sort .
 
A better car analogy might be turbo lag. Some expensive performance cars are sluggish off the line until the turbo spins up, then it takes off like a rocket a few seconds later. Still has a good 0-60 time and still gets you to the grocery store, but not nearly as pleasing to drive as a car with linear acceleration (which turbo configurations can achieve). But luckily we aren't so invested into ecosystems with cars.

I drive a turbodiesel nowadays. Drive it properly and you won't get caught off boost. That said, I've been known to provoke the turbo lag, then grin like a madman when getting pushed back into my seat very hard...

Each to their own I guess.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.