Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001

Earlier this week we picked up a Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and did a feature overview to see if it's worth $1,400, but we also thought we'd take a deeper look at Samsung's newest smartphone to see how the cameras measure up to the cameras in Apple's iPhone 11 Pro Max.

Hardware Details

Samsung's Galaxy S20 Ultra, like the iPhone, has a multi-lens rear camera setup. There's a 108-megapixel wide-angle camera, a 12-megapixel ultra wide-angle camera, a 48-megapixel telephoto camera, and a DepthVision Camera for portrait shots.


For comparison's sake, the iPhone is sporting a 12-megapixel ultra wide-angle camera, a 12-megapixel wide-angle camera, and a 12-megapixel telephoto camera.

Portrait Mode

When it comes to Portrait mode photos, the Galaxy S20 Ultra wins out thanks to that depth sensor. There's not a major difference, but the images coming from the S20 Ultra appear to be sharper and the edge detection is better. The iPhone does win out when it comes to dynamic range, and the S20 Ultra seems to have a bit of desaturation in some images, but overall, the S20 Ultra wins this category.


Standard Camera Tests

When it comes to standard photos using the three different lenses on each camera, we actually preferred the iPhone images for the most part because the iPhone offered more balanced color and better dynamic range, but with high-end smartphone cameras, a lot comes down to personal preference.


The S20 Ultra seems to be overexposing highlights in images with the sun and clouds, resulting in too much contrast. In images with less dynamic lighting, the results are closer and both look great.


The exception here is the ultra wide-angle camera. The S20 Ultra is just producing a sharper, crisper ultra wide-angle picture, while the iPhone produces a softer image. That's not too much of a surprise, though, because the sensor of Apple's ultra wide-angle lens isn't as good as the sensor in Apple's wide-angle camera lens.


S20 Ultra Space Zoom

The Galaxy S20 Ultra has some bells and whistles worth pointing out, such as a 100X "Space Zoom" feature. The iPhone 11 Pro Max maxes out at 10X digital zoom. The S20 Ultra clearly wins here, though you're not going to get a lot of use out of 100X zoom photos.


What is impressive, though, is photos taken with the 30X zoom feature. Samsung's 30X zoom pictures are crisper and clearer than Apple's 10x zoom photos.


S20 Ultra Single Take

There's also a "Single Take" feature that takes photos and videos from different angles and then spits out a bunch of different options like Boomerang-style videos, pictures with filters, videos with music, and more, so you have this kind of auto editing feature that can produce some interesting photo and video options you might not have thought to do on your own.


S20 Ultra 108-Megapixel Camera

We do need to mention that massive 108-megapixel camera. It definitely has focus issues at the current time, and it's hard to get it to focus.


When it does work, it can provide sharp, detailed photos that are great if you need to crop in, and it has great depth of field for some nice background bokeh.


A 108-megapixel camera produces massive file sizes, so this isn't a lens you're going to want to use often. Luckily, Samsung did built in a feature that lets it take more reasonable 12-megapixel photos.

Night Mode

Both phones have a Night Mode, and both Night Modes work fairly well. On the Galaxy S20 Ultra, it's a mode you need to enable that's not turned on by default, which is a bit of a hassle.


The iPhone seems to have better HDR processing and delivers a more usable photo in extreme low lighting conditions. In situations with just a bit more light, though, it's a wash - both produce nice images.


Video Comparison

One of the Galaxy S20 Ultra's major new features is 8K video, which is higher quality than the 4K video offered by the iPhone. 8K video from the S20 Ultra looks great, but image stabilization is poor, which means the 8K video is not as good as it sounds on paper.

When comparing 8K video from the S20 Ultra to 4K video shot on the iPhone 11 Pro (both at 24 frames per second because that's the max for the S20), the S20 Ultra's crop factor, rolling shutter, and lack of stabilization are highly noticeable.

Pitting 4K video against 4K video (at 60fps), both cameras perform similarly in terms of stabilization and focus, though the iPhone 11 Pro Max seems to be just a bit more stable. Both are just about equal, though.

Front-Facing Camera

As for the front-facing camera, there's a 40-megapixel selfie camera with an f/2.2 aperture in the Galaxy S20 Ultra, while the iPhone 11 Pro Max features a 12-megapixel camera with an f/2.2 aperture.


You might think the 40-megapixel camera is significantly better, but we didn't see a whole lot of difference between the S20 Ultra and the iPhone 11 Pro Max. Samsung does have a "beauty mode" that we turned off, while the iPhone has no similar mode that can be toggled on.


In a nutshell, as with most high-end smartphone camera comparisons, there's no crystal clear winner. Both the Galaxy S20 Ultra and the iPhone 11 Pro Max have good cameras that are capable of capturing some amazing photos in good lighting conditions.

The iPhone wins out when it comes to dynamic range and video stabilization, but the S20 has better portrait mode photos. Standard point and shoot images are going to come down to personal preference, so make sure to watch the video to see all of our comparisons.

Article Link: Camera Comparison: iPhone 11 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra


Jan 10, 2012
There's a few that I like the Samsung better, but most of them I like the iPhone 11 better. These comparisons are always fun. Whenever I do any of my own, I find the slightest movement, slightest press on the screen to focus changes the photo completely. That zoom ability would be handy.


macrumors G5
Aug 10, 2007
I'm a rolling stone.
These pictures say nothing without an SLR image as a reference.
Which one (of the above) is better....???? in closest to reality.

Edit: And then there's this, on what monitor are we looking at these pictures, varies enormously.
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect

Dan Holmstock

macrumors member
May 11, 2016
Culpeper VA
Wow have to say the iPhone IMHO blows this thing out the water. The ONLY thing I can give Samsung kudos for is that 30x zoom, that was actually pretty darn good. But paying 1400 for a phone that is NOT better than the current model iPhone? no thanks. Full disclose i use Android now, as I go back in forth eavery other year it seems.


macrumors 6502a
Aug 4, 2017
San Diego, CA
Keep in mind the iPhone 11 Pro Max has an identical camera to the regular 11 Pro, which means you're paying almost a 50% premium for the Samsung in this comparison.

That being said, the 30x zoom looks better than expected, but the images it produces are still not going to be particularly usable anywhere other than on a phone. My biggest conceit to the Samsung is that ultra-wide photo quality. Well done. Everywhere else goes to the iPhone, and for a lot less money, the value of my identity, and a usable OS. So I'd say I made the right choice...


macrumors 6502a
Mar 24, 2013
And maybe try the Iphone Ultra wide NOT having the sun in the FOV. the building are blah for sharpness because its trying to balance the sun Directly above them!

now i see it

macrumors G4
Jan 2, 2002
This is like comparing a fast PC with a fast Mac. They have little in common because of the differences in the OSes. After using android for a bit, I'd never use an android phone as my only phone regardless of how superior the hardware was. Doesn't matter how good the camera or SOC or display is if you don't like the OS.


macrumors 68000
Nov 5, 2010
another good mr video review
comparing the backs of both phone side by side
the ip11 looks pretty cool


macrumors 68040
Mar 16, 2016
Wild West
Sammobile reported yesterday that Samsung just rolled out 2nd Galaxy S20 firmware update which improves camera and gestures. I assume that MR's phone has older version of firmware.
  • Like
Reactions: Ramchi


macrumors 68000
Jul 25, 2017
Apples overly aggressive noise reduction algorithm has been ruining pictures since the 5S. Very obvious in the zoomed pics.
  • Like
Reactions: Ramchi


macrumors 68020
Jan 14, 2013
Yeah, 8k on a smartphone, let alone a camera is kinda pointless right now. Especially with the crop factor & lack of stabilzation.
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac


macrumors 68040
Mar 16, 2016
Wild West
Yeah, 8k on a smartphone, let alone a camera is kinda pointless right now. Especially with the crop factor & lack of stabilzation.
Samsung is releasing 8K TV sets. Using these smartphones people will be able to watch 8K videos at home. We'll see how well it works.


macrumors regular
Aug 7, 2016
Fort Worth, TX
Thanks for sharing another great review. Key takeaways:
  • Both phones have great camera options
  • 8k is unsurprisingly a niche feature. Good to know about jitter/rolling shutter
  • 30x to 100x zoom is very impressive (especially 30x). That's something the iPhone simply can't compete with.
  • I hope that the iPhone 12 will have 5G in all models, and an improved camera to at least be semi-comparable with 30x zoom... 5G likely, higher pixel count unlikely... oh well.
  • Like
Reactions: Rocko99991
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.