BTW, have something better to do with the phone instead of putting 64GB+ music (>16,000 songs)
HINT: it's not necessarily >16000 songs, depending on how it's encoded into it. I just don't get people who put that many songs in a phone which doesn't have enough battery to play even 10% of library.
hint: Most people don't listen to their entire library in one sittingWhat's good with the high-bit rate while you still use a headset to listen?
I hook it up to my cars' entertainment systems, you insensitive clod! Besides, it serves as an additional backup of my collection. It sounds like sh.t
You obviously have sh.t earbuds then. Invest in some Sennheiser headphones, or a receiver or amp connected to Klispsch reference-series speakersanyway. It's like put 100-Octane fuel into a Geo Metro and believe it performs better.
A Metro won't but a car with a smarter ECU will perform better on higher octane because it can then lean out the mixture and advance the timing - and it's not that they perform better on high octane gas, but detune themselves on low-octane gas to avoid ping which can damage the valves and pistons.
Also, Apple decide what the best for people and release products based on that. So far it proved they're right about that based on the success of iPhone. Samsung, on the other hand just release products based on users' "wish" list in forums and rumors and so far, not so successful in sale as they wanted.
really? They seem to be doing amazingly well, and Apple obviously feels threatened by Samsung. . . BTW, "shipped" doesn't mean "sold". For the record, in the last quarter alone, iPhone 5c that everyone bashed still outsold the leading Samsung handset, Galaxy S4 by 4:3.
So what you're saying is that Apple accounted internal transfers of stock as shipments, playing hollywood accounting games. Gotcha.