Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have the re-released Samsung G9 and I use it for office productivity (video conferencing and document production) and content consumption. I really like the curve in a seated or standing office application. I was using a 55" 4K curved HDTV previously but got sick of the huge up and down head movements. I think the R1000 curve is also much more effective and useful. YMMV as monitor experiences are like elbows, everyone has them and they usually stink.
 
I see it not as a 4K display with more pixels on either side, instead it is a 5K screen (such as the iMac one I am currently looking at) with pixels missing at the top and bottom.

I would rather see more vertical height (great for coding, word processing, browsing many websites, etc.) I'd love a large 3:2 ratio screen, as seen on the Microsoft Surface Studio.
I would much rather see a 64:9 display. Periphery pixels might not be looked at directly, but at least the would be visible, as opposed to putting them above eyesight.
 
Wish there were more 34" 5K2K displays like the LG, but not plagued with LG's issues. 40" is too big, and the pixel density is too low.
 
I believe the iMac 5K displays are the LG ultra fine 5K displays.

the reason people want Apple to start producing a monitor again is to get a better looking set up than the quite ugly LG design.
Actually I don’t mind the “old and squared” look, it’s the plastic built that I find disappointing. Apple case, same price and I buy 2 immediately...
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnmarki
Nice for those who can afford it, but for the vast majority of Apple customers, $6000-7000 for a display is completely absurd. What we really need is for Apple to take the iMac's display and sell a standalone version for about $1500-2000 max.
Simply: a restyled 5K Ultrafine display. How hard can it be? Is there any sort of agreed limitation in contract between Apple and LG for this not happening?
 
I don't get it.

Why is it that there is still not a monitor available - from anyone; Apple, LG, Dell, whoever - that is simply equivalent to the iMac display?

27", 32", whatever!

Is it so hard?

You can buy a second iMac and use it for a stand-alone 27" display for $1800, for crying out loud!
LG 27” 5K Ultrafine Display?
Could you share how to get iMac functioning as second display for MBP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Santiago and WP31
Actually I don’t mind the “old and squared” look, it’s the plastic built that I find disappointing. Apple case, same price and I buy 2 immediately...
Whenever people say something like that they usually don't mean it; like… if you really needed those two displays you would have the LG 5ks, and be talking about replacing those.

What's your setup today, and how are you being held back in work/play by not being able to get two 5Ks with a prettier frame?
 
Wow, these monitors are now all over the place in edit room and audio studios....So much more monitor real estate for timelines
 
Dear manufacturers,

Mac users want 200+ pixels per inch.

Sincerely,

Mac users.

Every. Damn. Year.

Dell sells more computers per week than Apple does per year. Nowhere does the press release even mention Mac users, the author of this article extrapolated the TB3 to include tenuous relevance to Macs.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Lemon Olive
Dear manufacturers,

Mac users want 200+ pixels per inch.

Sincerely,

Mac users.

Every. Damn. Year.
Seriously WTF? Why can't anyone in the entire display industry make a display that even remotely approaches the displays included on every Mac????
 
  • Like
Reactions: WP31
Dell sells more computers per week than Apple does per year. Nowhere does the press release even mention Mac users, the author of this article extrapolated the TB3 to include tenuous relevance to Macs.
Lol, no. Dell is praying their high end displays are purchased by Mac users with money. Windows doesn't look any better on this display than it does on a $139 display from Amazon so, Dell knows exactly who they're making this for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GalileoSeven
I wonder what kind of GPU is necessary get full resolution on these monitors? Will the Intel Iris 6100 with 1536 MB of VRAM on my 2015 MBP be enough or will I need to get an eGPU?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WP31
Simply: a restyled 5K Ultrafine display. How hard can it be? Is there any sort of agreed limitation in contract between Apple and LG for this not happening?
Agreed - I find it really odd that there hasn't been another 27" 5K monitor released either by LG or another monitor company (let alone Apple, now that they're selling the XDR). The LG 27" super-fine has a pretty dated design (it didn't look great when it came out, let alone by today's standards)...

I've really enjoyed my 27" 4K monitor (I run it at "Looks like 2560 x 1440") as I've been working-from-home for 10 months now during the pandemic. It looks great, so no urgency for me to upgrade. But I know a true 5K 27" monitor (so I can run true pixel-doubled "Looks like 2560 x 1440") would look even smoother + less work on the graphics for my MBP.

I would be all over a modern-update on a 27" 5K monitor.
 
In 2018 Apple shipped somewhere around 43 % of what Dell shipped... So unless Dell sales have increased by 2200% in two years, no. That figure by the way, would be 3.6 x the total global shipments of all PC makers for 2018

You are clearly looking at monetary based figures which are relatively meaningless when corporate customers pay around $300 per dell machine, but closer to $1200 on Apple.
 
You are clearly looking at monetary based figures which are relatively meaningless when corporate customers pay around $300 per dell machine, but closer to $1200 on Apple.
Nothing to do with prices or "monetary based figures". Just number of machines.


Dell shipped about 42M PCs/laptops in 2018. Apple shipped about 18M. Neither count includes tablet devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Santiago
Agreed - I find it really odd that there hasn't been another 27" 5K monitor released either by LG or another monitor company (let alone Apple, now that they're selling the XDR). The LG 27" super-fine has a pretty dated design (it didn't look great when it came out, let alone by today's standards)...

I've really enjoyed my 27" 4K monitor (I run it at "Looks like 2560 x 1440") as I've been working-from-home for 10 months now during the pandemic. It looks great, so no urgency for me to upgrade. But I know a true 5K 27" monitor (so I can run true pixel-doubled "Looks like 2560 x 1440") would look even smoother + less work on the graphics for my MBP.

I would be all over a modern-update on a 27" 5K monitor.
Jumping in the fray here - lots of comments sprinkled in this thread about resolution, PPI, and monitor/screen size.

My first thought for you is that LG makes the panel (the 27" 5k - 5120x2880) and they put it in their 27" Ultrafine display and Dell put it in their 27" 5k display. Not enough people bought them so Dell stopped producing their version. I believe, but am not 100% sure, that it is also the same panel that is in the 27" 5k iMac. That's it, those are the only "5k" monitors out there and the reason is that not enough people bought them to justify continued production of the panels and screens. I believe the LG 5k still exists because Apple (somehow) is still incentivizing production of the display. It's really only made for a Mac, not a Windows machine.

My second thought, for the rest of the thread, is that I am the one looking for a 49" 10240x2880 monitor. Essentially two 'real' 27" 5k monitors merged into one panel at 200+ PPI...for less than $6k. I would pay for that but not enough people are talking with their wallets for the manufacturers to create such a thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mastercheif91
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.