It's funny how the Apple fanboys try to deny the fact that it's pretty easy to bypass the security of their new gadget. I own Apple products myself so don't get me wrong. But the CCC isn't a joke that claims stuff they didn't test. You just need a fingerprint on a bottle or something like that. And as someone already pointed out. Most of your scanners do 2400 dpi so no problem.
Huh? Haven't we known this is a way around these sensors?
I have a way to bypass a password too...Look at the post-it of a users passwords and copy them down. Then type it into the iPhone to bypass the login.
</sarcasm>
Judging from previous reports on fingerprint replicas for bypassing systems like this one, probably less than an hour.Even if they could get a perfect scan of your print how long would it take them to get it and set this up?
So a thief walks into a Starbucks where an iPhone 5S and a Samsung Galaxy S4 are sitting next to each other. He notices the owner of the iPhone 5S is using the finger print scanner. Guess which phone he steals?
The sensor should included something that detects a human pulse.
Boy Apple is on a roll.
1) No iPhones 5S until sometime in October
2) Finger ID easily thwarted
3) Apple TV Bricking
Bad
Not going to be good for Apple stock tomorrow.
The sheet he has on his finger looks like it is clear. How do we know its not just scanning his finger through the paper?
It's funny how the Apple fanboys try to deny the fact that it's pretty easy to bypass the security of their new gadget. I own Apple products myself so don't get me wrong. But the CCC isn't a joke that claims stuff they didn't test. You just need a fingerprint on a bottle or something like that. And as someone already pointed out. Most of your scanners do 2400 dpi so no problem.
The sensor should included something that detects a human pulse.
Or peek over their shoulder as they type in their passcode. Or look at surveillance cam footage of someone doing the same. Or just grab the phone and do a brute force attack on the 4-digit passcode. Etc. etc.
The fingerprint scan still provides better security. First, you'd have to get someone to consent to a 2400 dpi scan of their finger, or somehow do it covertly. Then you'd have to go through the elaborate process of making a print the scanner would recognize. Then you have to actually get ahold of their phone so you can physically use the print. In any case, it would be easier to just force a person to enter their passcode (or scan their finger) at gunpoint. No password can defeat that.
Um, excellent reporting MacRumors. Notice how the screen size, and silver edge on a black phone are indicative of an iPhone 4 or 4s? Well, then it doesn't have a TouchID sensor.
If it does, it was hacked in, probably improperly. But it doesn't appear that they even tried to fake that, as the Home button doesn't have the 5s' characteristic metallic edge.
******** video. ******** 'reporting' of ********.
I thought the sensor was supposed to read the skin layer behind the fingerprint![]()