This is why I use a different body part![]()
We have a winner!
Funniest response in this thread.
This is why I use a different body part![]()
Boy Apple is on a roll.
1) No iPhones 5S until sometime in October
2) Finger ID easily thwarted
The video shows him repeatedly registering only his index finger. That said, I agree it was stupid to have the same person apply the filmit should have been a different person who first tries his/her print, gets rejected, and then tries the film.last time i checked you can register up to 5 fingers(not all at the same time).. what makes you think he didnt register that middle finger already ?![]()
The video shows him repeatedly registering only his index finger. That said, I agree it was stupid to have the same person apply the film—it should have been a different person who first tries his/her print, gets rejected, and then tries the film.
How about lifting the finger print off the home button and put it in the scanner...
How about lifting the finger print off the home button and put it in the scanner...
Frankly, most thieves who are going to target Smart phones are looking for a quick few hundred bucks. They aren't looking for a process that will take them hours to do. Why waste several hours of their time (obtaining a good finger print, scanning it, printing it, etc., etc.) when they could just steal another one?
You guys are missing the point.
This is not good as much as I like Apple. The future of fingerprint scanner as Timmy kind of mentioned is using it to make purchases and not just logging into phone - this will be huge opportunity for Apple.
If people can break in and make big purchases like a G4 Jet or Porshe or stuff from Amazon with your fingerprint and credit account this is not good sign for fingerprint security for Apple. Back to drawing board or fix.
Judging from previous reports on fingerprint replicas for bypassing systems like this one, probably less than an hour.
I remember this from an episode of Mythbusters too.
I don't believe it would work. The Touch ID scanner is supposed to look at sub-epidermal layers (or whatever). This guy used his OWN finger to unlock his OWN phone - there just happened to be a thin layer in between. The scanner may still have been reading his sub-epidermal details.
This demo is a fail. He should have proven that his phone could be unlocked by someone else.
So as long as one has access to the actual finger and whatever the heck can take pics at 2400dpi, one can make a "working copy" of it. Seems easier to beat the **** out of someone for the 4-digit passcode.
It's still pretty damn secure no matter what anyone says. The fact that the code is still a measly 4 digits is the weakest link of all.
It's an 5s "space gray"
This doesn't surprise me at all. CCC was able to do this with PC laptops with finger print sensors more than 10 years ago. Apple, ignorant as always, couldn't care less about security concerns.
The four-digit passcode still has a 1/36 chance of you getting the code right.
It's funny how the Apple fanboys try to deny the fact that it's pretty easy to bypass the security of their new gadget. I own Apple products myself so don't get me wrong. But the CCC isn't a joke that claims stuff they didn't test. You just need a fingerprint on a bottle or something like that. And as someone already pointed out. Most of your scanners do 2400 dpi so no problem.
No it isn't. Find me a picture anywhere of a space grey with a silver side. Does not exist. (Until you scratch the hell out of the anodized black side with change in your pocket.) And, again, the screen dimensions are obviously wrong.