This watch battery life is much better and cheaper
But as kdarling pointed out above, its also much more primitive.
This watch battery life is much better and cheaper
This watch battery life is much better and cheaper
I just logged in to say that your comment just shows how ignorant you are of how a final product such as the Apple Watch gets its final price. The price you pay includes years of research, development, which again intrinsically include design, prototyping, machines, countless man hours, the very same again for the accompanying software. Potatohead thieves can blatantly rip these off and sell inferior plastic junk (eg. Samsung) for 1/20th the price, because they didn't have to do any of these.
If you don't understand product development and business management, I'd suggest you refrain yourself from making ridiculous comments about it.
The word GIVE ME A BREAK resounds large and clear, the screen is crap (you see right by looking at it), the SOC is crap (off the shelf and slow), the build and material... You got it... Crap. The integration with the Iphone (or any other phone).... Crap AND a security risk... The interface... Compatibility with Iphone Apps (you know the SDK...) well obviously Crap.
So, yeah, if you like crap they got it for you.
Ripping off someone else's design means they didn't pay for research, design, marketing, or anything else. Don't post again until you understand how business works.
except there's nothing smart about Nano.
Maybe next time you will tell me ipod touch also since you can buy an armband?
not only it looks exactly same as Apple Watch.
it only costs 1/15 what Apple wants to gouge you for. AND the battery life is 10 times what Apple can do.
Let's be honest, this is probably made in the same factory that's producing AppleWatch.
Correct, all these so called smart watches don't hold the candle to the Swiss watch designs.
There is way too much focus on the health & fitness FAD on all of these.
Personally, I can't understand it.
How about introducing a smart watch that is a WATCH without all this fitness & health crap...
I actually think this is funny because it has the main functionality that a lot of people want and it is so dirt cheap that you don't even care if you lose or break it. So this could actually sell quite well. It is of course nothng like the iWatch.
The only concern is that products like this cheapen the image of the iWatch and this can and will harm Apples sales and therefore down the road jobs.
If something like this with a different design at that price gets released I might be interested. With a different design it would not hurt Apple and technologically it is just a simple bluetooth linked gadget like a car stereo or any of the bluetooth speakers out there.
You're talking about a fake IPHONE, not a fake WATCH. They are completely different.Right. Tell you what then, go buy it. If it's all the same except less expensive and even has better battery life, then this is a steal. Please buy it and review for us.
When the iPhone 3GS came out, my father found a ripoff in China also and bought it thinking it was probably just as good. This thing sucked ass. It had a resistive touch screen and it took four or five swipes before it finally unlocked. When I tried opening the settings, it took 10 seconds to open up. Then it took several seconds between tapping a setting and when it would actually open.
Plus this copy requires USB which means it needs to be plugged in. Fail.
The thread title says they "sold Fake Apple Watches", which makes it sound like Hyperdon was trying to pass it off as an Apple Watch. But they weren't.
Nowhere in this article is it stated that the company was falsely selling this watch branded/labeled as an Apple product. Unless this was the case, the headline is absolutely misleading. It's one thing to say they were selling a clone, knockoff, or use similar verbiage to describe something with similar looks and/or features, but that doesn't make it a "fake". The company used their own name and own product name. They weren't misleading anyone to think it was an actual Apple watch, were they? It's one thing to say they were ripping on Apple's look and feel (obviously the case), but fake? No.
Switzerland is laughing hard at both products, whilst retaining decorum and passive neutrality. Quiet, successful confidence doesn't need to protest, it just giggles and carries on as normal.
I actually find it fun to watch users eye the Apple Watch, then suddenly change their minds when they see this faker at CES, now everyone want THIS one..
Gee... I you u guys were Apple users
no wonder they were somewhere at the back,,, they knew they were breaking the rules at CES.
Just seems everyone likes Apple because they like the design,,, they just don't like the software.
Apple wouldn't have made a damn watch if it wasn't for all the smart watches ALREADY on the market. Explain to me what you mean by "quality". You mean using cheap aluminum? Sorry hunny but no watch is worth more than $50 unless it has diamonds and crap.
Apple has a high profit margin, that's the only reason why their crap is so expensive. It's not because it's " better."
The world of low life copycats survives because there're people like you who don't have respect for hard works. Next time, tell your parents to go for health check up at a unlicensed practitioner instead of a certified doctor who charges 20x more.
I've got my own business and to have an Apple Watch that alerts me to emails while on the go and lets me see it right away instead of digging through my pocket to get my iPhone is more than important. I need to make timely responses to my clients.
The Apple Watch will sell big. I even hear people wanting to buy this that weren't normally excited by Apple products.
Just the fact this thread has gone on so far talking about this fake watch shows the level of awareness and interest.
I'm surprised that the thing can actually make calls and play music, seeing as it's a cheap POS. Wonder what it's made of? Cheap plastics?
Also, the Digital Crown on the fake watch looks wayyyy off. It looks like a cog or gear on the fake thing.
I don't think you're seeing this the right way. Is it a cheap POS, or an illustration over an forthcoming over priced novelty device that isn't worth half the proposed retail price?
My roommate just bought a cheap Chinese android knock off watch, and it does everything it's $200 counterparts do perfectly fine... all these watches are are blue tooth headsets for the wrist. They need a phone to do nearly anything, and the few things they don't, are fitbit like things.
The Apple Watch is just as guilty of these things as the Galaxy Gear and every other watch out there. "See texts, read email, use voice commands... that your phone that's already in arms reach does better...."
The promise of the apple watch was all these alleged health sensors that turned out not to be there.
So hey, if not for Apple's refusal to allow anything third party to do anything with IOS without jail breaking, this cheap copy is probably just as capable at the Apple watch except it won't rip you off or come in 14K gold.
"That turned out not to be there"? Err, the Apple watch is confirmed to have a heart rate sensor.
... and I'm willing to bet that it doesn't have the AppleWatch's pressure sensing feature and that the internals are quite a bit weaker.
If you can attach more than 5 images in one post for me, I'll pay you in cookies...
"denouncing" - lighten up my serious fellow - it's just a little bit of fun, mixed with an Atlantic ocean sized portion of truth. Your reaction just reinforces that - but come on - have a giggle and stop being so serious![]()