Giz knowingly purchased a lost item. You can "end of story" all you want, that doesn't change anything.
They probably paid big bucks to get their hands on it...
I love how people are hating on Gizmodo when it's the drunk idiot's fault (if this story is even true) for losing the iPhone. It's huge tech news, and Gizmodo paid to get the exclusive story. That's their business! I would have done the same thing if I had an inside scoop on a story relevant to my industry.
Either that dude is so fired, or this was an intentional plant of a fake device to trip people up.
Right, and what's the statute on the time we're supposed to allow something to sit there and stay "not lost" until someone else can claim it? Can I go back to the café where I left my pencil in 5 years and expect to retrieve the item?
You're crazy. If you leave something in a public place and someone else picks it up, it's not theft. It's you're an idiot.
They should have left it with the bar's lost & found. Taking it, then selling it... sounds like theft to me.
Gizmodo names the freaking dude who lost the iPhone???????
Can you imagine if this guy was standing next to Steve Jobs as he is reading Gizmodo while exclaiming...."If I ever get my hands on the imbecile who lost the prototype I'm going stomp on him till his guts spew out!"
The fact that they know the name of the person believed to have left the phone in the bar would pretty much make the prosecutors case.
Because Apple has the ability to remote wipe any phone, but not the ability to figure out who the phone belonged to. And they knew to wipe the phone because... the employee didn't go into work the next day and tell them he lost his phone?
Right, and what's the statute on the time we're supposed to allow something to sit there and stay "not lost" until someone else can claim it? Can I go back to the café where I left my pencil in 5 years and expect to retrieve the item?
You're crazy. If you leave something in a public place and someone else picks it up, it's not theft. It's you're an idiot.
Trafficking stolen goods? Hardly. As far as the original finder is concerned, it was abandoned property. Sure, they should've reported it to the police to give Apple a chance to reclaim it, but it's not stolen. That's like saying you stole the $5 bill you found on the street.
Giz knowingly purchased a lost item. You can "end of story" all you want, that doesn't change anything.
Of course not.So even if I didn't steal the car and only took your keys, it wouldn't be stealing?
When that ex-Apple marketing wrote about Apple's intentional leaks, he emphasized the "anonymous" nature of them, so that they could not be traced back to Apple unless the journalists or bloggers themselves revealed their sources. Of course, they don't do that, as many companies employ these controlled leaks and they would lose access to many such leaks later.
Agreed! The phone wasn't their property. They could have taken it to a police station. Maybe even called APPLE. But, they took it. Excuse - gosh the owner didn't come back.....SORRY!![]()
Giz knowingly purchased a lost item. You can "end of story" all you want, that doesn't change anything.