This seems more like a shell company being propelled by a funding company trying to raise money for it's investors.
Priceless.
Were you referring to MS or HP?
This seems more like a shell company being propelled by a funding company trying to raise money for it's investors.
Microsoft's problem is going to be how in the heck do they put all the crap load of features in Office onto a tablet without making it cluttered up like this CloudOn solution is doing.
CloudOn! Apply directly to the forehead!
CloudOn! Apply directly to the forehead!
CloudOn! Apply directly to the forehead!
I'm sorry but this is just terrible compared to Apple's direction with Pages, Numbers, and Keynote on the iPad.
Apps for tablets need to be completely redesigned to take into consideration the smaller screen and the use of a finger for input instead of a mouse. What the apps should share is compatibility of features, not the interface implementation.
Features need to be compatible between each other to prevent any problems of creating something on one interface and having it stripped out on another. That the only problem with editing and syncing documents between computers and devices in the cloud. But that's about it. A desktop interface simply should not be dropped onto a tablet.
Microsoft's problem is going to be how in the heck do they put all the crap load of features in Office onto a tablet without making it cluttered up like this CloudOn solution is doing.
Apple is in a good position with its iWorks suite because they have less features to integrate onto a tablet, thus making it viable that they can pull it off. They are almost there, but not yet. And I don't think they are planning to add any more features to the desktop version until they get feature parity with the iOS devices.
Is this totally not working for anyone else?
CloudOn. Nobody has made fun of this name yet?
"Excel still has no competition for our use. Doing a lot of income tax prep our use of Excel to do that part of the business plus much of the accounting work means that Numbers will never be used by us. It would be nice if it could get to the level of being good enough to use for even simple spreadsheets."
"I've used MS Excel on my Macs since 1985. No one has shown that they can come close to MS Excel. Even MS is having trouble keeping Excel as good as it was."
"MicroSoft has screwed up Excel with things like the ribbon."
Is this totally not working for anyone else? I downloaded it 2 hrs ago and haven't been able to use it yet. Synced to Dropbox with no problems, but can't open or creat any documents/ppt's.
Anyone else unable to download?
It's perfectly legal if it is running a licensed version of office on the cloud. The question is, how does CloudOn pay for that licensing when they aren't charging the customer anything, and it doesn't even seem like they are doing any advertising?
Yes and no. A VNC client typically shows a user's entire desktop, but this is just showing one application, so it's more Citrix/XenApp like than VNC. But the idea is correct.
Still, it is very much a correct usage of the term "cloud". The idea of the cloud is the application is running on-demand out on a server somewhere that is typically spawned on-demand, to fit in the "pay as you go" model. It doesn't really matter if the client interface is VNC, webpage, or whatever. The application is still running in the cloud.
I think the link is deadIf you go to Cloudon's website: "CloudOn is currently sold out. We thank you for your support. To receive CloudOn product information and be notified when our next release is available, sign up below"
Considering it's the desktop version of Office running on your iPad, you kinda need those function keys.
So how is that dumb?
So is browsing the web now considered "cloud computing"?
Me thinks iTunes pulled it as I get a message stating the app is'nt available in the US.
So is browsing the web now considered "cloud computing"?
There is no real definition of cloud anything so, yes, it can. Lame. It was originally used to reference generic, agnostic services-- storage, computing, etc., but now it's so nebulous (pun intended) that it can be any kind of server farm or thing you access over the internet.
Priceless.
Were you referring to MS or HP?![]()
You guys are getting ridiculous.No, browsing the web in general is not considered "cloud computing." However, a site that you visit may be a cloud.
I'll give you another example. Netflix has been well documented to have switched over to using cloud computing and a cloud architecture for their streaming services. If you go to their website and update your queue, watch a movie, or update your account information, then yes, you are engaging in cloud computing because Netflix is gauging the demand of you as well as all of the other customers it has and they are dynamically scaling how many servers they have instantiated automatically (no human involved).
However, if you just browse apple.com, and then go to microsoft.com, and then go to macrumors.com, that is not cloud computing... that is called web surfing.
What Netflix does is more of what I consider true cloud computing-- having the same content and services available from any location (a "seamless experience," as Steve would have called it). But these days everyone is throwing around the term "cloud" for anything you access over the internet. I refuse to start referring to web applications, or any ol' server clusters, as clouds. No way.
A public cloud is one based on the standard cloud computing model, in which a service provider makes resources, such as applications and storage, available to the general public over the Internet. Public cloud services may be free or offered on a pay-per-usage model.
I can't find it on the app store.![]()