We're not comparing CNN TV...
We're comparing cnn.com to the iPhone app. Cnn.com, last time I checked, wait, let me check again, ah, yes, it's free, 100% free and it's got ads to make it that way. Now, if you're going to charge people to view your content on the internet it's been a long established norm that pay = no ads. If CNN doesn't want to follow this that's fine but I hope all of you people who are paying realize that you're paying for something you can get, legally, 100% free on your computer.
Don't try the "it cost money to make the app" argument either because it costs much, much more to maintain cnn.com and update it etc than it did to make this app and the website is still free.
Free = ad supported, paid = supported via paying for it. You shouldn't support companies that are trying to double dip - especially multi-billion dollar ones that are just trying to squeeze every last cent out of you they can.
We're comparing cnn.com to the iPhone app. Cnn.com, last time I checked, wait, let me check again, ah, yes, it's free, 100% free and it's got ads to make it that way. Now, if you're going to charge people to view your content on the internet it's been a long established norm that pay = no ads. If CNN doesn't want to follow this that's fine but I hope all of you people who are paying realize that you're paying for something you can get, legally, 100% free on your computer.
Don't try the "it cost money to make the app" argument either because it costs much, much more to maintain cnn.com and update it etc than it did to make this app and the website is still free.
Free = ad supported, paid = supported via paying for it. You shouldn't support companies that are trying to double dip - especially multi-billion dollar ones that are just trying to squeeze every last cent out of you they can.