There is a flaw in the touch bar. ... A power button should always be physical. That is the #1 rule in electronics.
Fixed that. Now watch Apple eschew the rule.
There is a flaw in the touch bar. ... A power button should always be physical. That is the #1 rule in electronics.
Why? What function would it add? You can do almost all of things on a touch screen using the touch pad using multi-touch gestures. A touch screen would add very little functionality other than to.... I don't even know what the point would be. That would be much more a gimmick.
It seems that a lot of people in this thread really like this. But I'm struggling to realize why. I don't really see the benefit of having information displayed on the keyboard. What would really be the benefit of having information placed not the keyboard? I'm already looking at the screen so put stuff there.
For developers to really take advantage of this, Apple needs to also update their external keyboards to have this.
...which is precisely why they'll talk about the OS X enhancements during WWDC.Yeah, I think the renderings look beautiful, but I'm struggling to see the point of it.
I give this a resounding "meh"
Looks cheesy, don't really see the point
What if I want to turn my laptop on or off without opening or closing it? What if I want to to just go to sleep instead of powering off?
I fail to see how a thin strip OLED touch panel is innovation.
[doublepost=1465545246][/doublepost]
That's first quarter. Q4 is Back to School to the end of October.
as always? what new hater narrative is this of which you speak? apple's whole thing theyre known for is taking crummy current tech and releasing it in a very not-half-baked fashion -- the PC, the MP3 player, the cell phone, the tablet, the ultralight notebook, etc..That seems awesome! But as always, Apple will deliver it half baked, so the good stuff will come in 2/3 years...
I'd much prefer the MacBook Pro to have a tactile keyboard and multi-touch screen like Surface Pro than what is rumoured here. Mac OSX would be awesome run in multi-touch but Apple don't seem interested which is a shame.
Really? What purpose would a touch screen have? Other than to add fingerprints to a large glass panel. Perhaps you have extraordinarily long fingers - say 8" long, which allows you to move your fingers from the keyboard to the top of the screen without having to lift your arm and hand.
Because if you don't, what you're doing in having to move your hand or both hands to the screen from the flat horizontal plane of the keyboard to the vertical screen is just slowing down your ability to work.
Apple made the trackpad multi-touch for a reason, because it's far more efficient to use it to control things on the screen. I would argue that the next step is actually making the keyboard and trackpad just another screen that is multi-touch, so you can more naturally interact with the screen, without having to touch the screen.
Agreed. If one can't touch type the Esc key, it's a fail for use by developers (especially Vim users), and some Apple engineers will need to spend a lot of time in the penalty box.No hardware ESC key, no thanks.
Hey Siri, Turn Macbook Pro On![]()
I know this is only a concept but..
Unless Apple found a way to make it not the worst thing ever. For instance by not making it work just like any other flat touch screen. Why are noone thinking Haptic Feedback?