Confirmed: iPad 3 Has a 2048x1536 Retina Display

What about the Apps?

As it is .....iPhone Apps are 1/2 the size on the current iPad.


Image

Image


It kinda sucks.

What happens now that it's quadrupled ?

Um...that's like complaining that your PS1 games look like crap on the PS3.

You move on into the future like everything else. Those games were made for the iPhone/iPad1&2.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I'll still be holding it rather close.
Aren't any of you people near sighted? Retina display is ideal for persons like me who have no choice but to hold things close to read them (because glasses/contact lenses are for distance, not reading!!).
 
and the product sounds more elegant because of his accent. :cool:

I like Ive, but he rambles way too much and his ******** dictionary is five times as thick as Steve could ever dream of having. He needs to stick to design, he has no stage presence and his hyperbole is off the charts. I can't stand to listen to him verbally vomit about Apple products and the "emotions" they invoke in users and how they love their products. It like he thinks people love them like their kids or pets. The only one close to Ive in hyperbole is Forstall. That guy steals ideas and acts as though he was the genius who thought it up and then gets all wide-eyed about how great it is. Since he has been in charge of iOS it's been nothing more than ripping off big features from other platforms or Apples own devs. Forstall has no shame and his smug smiles presenting others ideas as his own drive me up the wall whenever he is on stage. Schiller is really the only one I can tolerate, maybe Eddy Cue. Cue looks like a nerd and would be fun to talk to. NONE are the salesman Steve was and none should emulate him.

I'll still be holding it rather close.
Aren't any of you people near sighted? Retina display is ideal for persons like me who have no choice but to hold things close to read them (because glasses/contact lenses are for distance, not reading!!).

You either need a new eye doctor, or a new prescription.
 
It kinda sucks.

What happens now that it's quadrupled ?
Very simple, Apple moves on. Just like every other new product of theirs, new features are exclusive to newer devices.

Take a look at this recent article: http://www.ihelplounge.com/ihelplounge/2012/02/apple-requires-retina-screenshots-in-the-app-store-.html

It's easy to see where Apple is going with that restriction. Once devs up the quality of their apps and retina apps pretty much take over, it's simply history repeating itself. Scale up retina on a (supposed) iPad 3 display and this is what you get:





 
Hmm...It might be time to sell the iPad 2. I am feeling that Apple may keep the iPad 2 as an entry level model, as it is still the best tablet on the market. iPad 2 at $399 (Or maybe even $349, that would cause crazy demand and drop used market prices like mad), iPad 3 at $499+.

I don't think I will be able to resist the amazing display.

Also I won't have any way to test hi-res graphics on the display except for on the iPad itself. a 1920x1200 monitor won't be able to display the full resolution simulator.

Retina display MBP's anyone? :D
 
Form Factor of iPad3

What's interesting is how similar this LCD is in size and design to the iPad 2 LCD. The attachments shown are nearly identical -- which makes you wonder how similar the device will be on the outside to the iPad 2. With this ultra resolution -- knock off's will be difficult -- so the cost of these displays is going to be very high -- so replacement cost may go up quite a bit for iPad LCD repair damage.

But this is likely to be a huge consumer winner for Apple. That screen will be amazing.
 
Last edited:
If you don't mind my asking, what do you expect to be able to do with a quad, you could not do with a dual? For liner code, a faster dual would be better. You could jack the clock speed up to the point that the device returns an answer before you ask a question. The tradeoff with battery life would not make this practical.

More is not always better.

I suppose that currently a faster dual would be fine, but there is certainly a quad coming with the iPad 3 or 4. Perhaps more RAM would be more important right now. I'd like to see the iPad 3 a lot faster than the 2, which was a big improvement over the original. I think in the near future we will have quads with the same battery life that we have now. They did it with the Macbooks, they'l do it with the iPad.

At this time the Retina display and LTE would probably have a bigger impact on performance. I'm all for getting as much as I can for the same price points. The iPad 3 should be outstanding.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

HKZ/MST3K said:
and the product sounds more elegant because of his accent. :cool:

I like Ive, but he rambles way too much and his ******** dictionary is five times as thick as Steve could ever dream of having. He needs to stick to design, he has no stage presence and his hyperbole is off the charts. I can't stand to listen to him verbally vomit about Apple products and the "emotions" they invoke in users and how they love their products. It like he thinks people love them like their kids or pets. The only one close to Ive in hyperbole is Forstall. That guy steals ideas and acts as though he was the genius who thought it up and then gets all wide-eyed about how great it is. Since he has been in charge of iOS it's been nothing more than ripping off big features from other platforms or Apples own devs. Forstall has no shame and his smug smiles presenting others ideas as his own drive me up the wall whenever he is on stage. Schiller is really the only one I can tolerate, maybe Eddy Cue. Cue looks like a nerd and would be fun to talk to. NONE are the salesman Steve was and none should emulate him.

I'll still be holding it rather close.
Aren't any of you people near sighted? Retina display is ideal for persons like me who have no choice but to hold things close to read them (because glasses/contact lenses are for distance, not reading!!).

You either need a new eye doctor, or a new prescription.

Um, no, that's just how lenses & eyes work. As a nearsighted person, I CAN read with eye correction present but it's uncomfortable & results in migraines. The older you get, the more you'll appreciate the imperfections of human eyes & the limits of eye correction.
 
Well, they finally got me. I'm getting an iPad. I'm just looking forward to seeing what home grown apps they release it with (Please please Aperture please!!)
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)



Um, no, that's just how lenses & eyes work. As a nearsighted person, I CAN read with eye correction present but it's uncomfortable & results in migraines. The older you get, the more you'll appreciate the imperfections of human eyes & the limits of eye correction.

Near sighted means you can see up close without corrective lenses, but not far away. You seem to be claiming the opposite.

I'm near sited and require glasses for distance vision, but reading with my glasses has never caused discomfort or migraines in the 31 years I've worn them.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I'll still be holding it rather close.
Aren't any of you people near sighted? Retina display is ideal for persons like me who have no choice but to hold things close to read them (because glasses/contact lenses are for distance, not reading!!).

Huh? There's this thing called farsightedness and contacts/glasses do help with it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top