I wasn’t doubting the claim.Just a quick search, named Google, but its usual there, not only Google. I saw a docu regarding this a while back.
![]()
Several Google employees say they've lived in the company parking lot — here's why they did it
One employee was rumored to have lived in his car for two to three years. Afterwards, he'd saved enough to buy a house.www.businessinsider.com
Good. Let’s kill tech innovation in the US. We’ve already lost manufacturing, now let’s go for tech."According to Bloomberg, Cicilline did mention the possibility of a Glass-Steagall law for technology platforms, which would prevent tech companies from both running a platform and competing on it at the same time."
That actually sounds like a good idea.
Don’t blame Apple one bit for legally not paying more taxes than they have to. I do the same thing.lol with Tax cuts, and its not proved they really did it. He should simply have “demanded” them to bring it back, or fine em.
Exactly this. Let’s be mad at Apple for following the law. Makes perfect sense. For all the talk about taxes I have yet to meet any person who pays one cent more than they are legally required to.Don’t blame Apple one bit for legally not paying more taxes than they have to. I do the same thing.
Still can’t understand why they blocked xcloud other than trying to squeeze money out of Microsoft.
Allowing iPhones to run other operating systems could work. Let people load whatever Android they like and let Apple provide iOS as the default choice for those that want it. Bootcamp for iPhone.New OS, new ecosystem developed and nurtured only by the developers and make their own rules in a cohesive fashion is the only solution.
A revised ToS would take care of third-party software incidents like that so no, AppleCare would not cover it.Who is responsible when an Apple hardware running this OS overheats, and burns a hole on the desk or an unsuspecting user's body? Should AppleCare cover the hardware repair costs?
I'll go one better and suggest the ability to install other operating systems, with their own app stores.I am proposing that it should be possible to install additional app stores to the iPhone, just like Steam and other stores can be installed on macOS alongside The Mac App Store.
I doubt Apple will allow that now when they are in a much stronger position than in 80s even then they didn’t allow when they were even bad. But with TC you never know.Allowing iPhones to run other operating systems could work. Let people load whatever Android they like and let Apple provide iOS as the default choice for those that want it. Bootcamp for iPhone.
News just in, Publicly traded company tries to retain market share and earn a profit.
If the choice is between allowing Android or breaking up iOS, I'm sure they would choose an open hardware platform.I doubt Apple will allow that now when they are in a much stronger position than in 80s even then they didn’t allow when they were even bad. But with TC you never know.
You can't have an open os that is also safe and secure. They are diametrically opposite goals. Freedom or security-- choose one.I prefer a complete open OS where developers forum to have complete control and even license or charge the mobile phone users for a small annual charges to keep the ecosystem safe, secured yet vibrant.
I'll go one better and suggest the ability to install other operating systems, with their own app stores.
iOS is really great and lots of people love it. Messing around with it is a terrible, terrible idea. However, allowing Android to be installed as an alternative makes a lot of sense and would allow Apple to continue business as usual for those who want the Apple experience.
Permit third party app stores and refine the IAP requirements.
Imagine if Walmart had the same rules that Apple does. When you buy an iPhone from Walmart, every single iOS App purchased on it had a 30% fee that went to Walmart. That'd be insane.
At the same time though, Walmart isn't full of free products from companies hoping to make money off of IAP later. I'm not sure what the right balance to strike is, but a properly functioning free market can figure that out for us. Permit third party app stores and see what rules end up emerging at each of them.
I wonder if Apple will be permitted to keep the iOS App Store. They were the immoral idiots who didn't properly regulate themselves though, so they get what they deserve when the government comes and breaks them up. The government may determine that only third party app stores are allowed to exist from now on, just like movie studios lost the ability to own movie theaters.
Let me be clear that I prefer Apple to continue business as usual and everyone bugger off, but Apple may be forced into an ultimatum here. If that happens, they may have to choose the lesser of two evils.I think independent stores should be fair and workable on all platforms.
It’s definitely bold, but I don’t see any of this happening. Of course, I and we are just bystanders to the process.Bold Prediction Time:
New Law will force AAPL to spin-off the iOS & Mac App Stores !
If done right, the result will be "Trusted, Verified, & Transparent" App Stores !
A welcome change !
Congress will need input from App Devs to get it right !
And I don't mean just the BIG BOYS !
Across the Board / Spectrum input !
From a User's perspective, the two main issues:
1.) App Discovery
2.) Pricing
will both benefit !
Yep, the free software revolution was a big hit in that respect.I think *nix kicked it's nuts in the server market as well.
That's how it works with PG&E and other utilities. Effectively turns it into a government operation with all the DMV-like downsides, but at least they don't charge totally insane prices. Once something is a monopoly, the service is going to suck no matter what.The simplest solution is to tax monopolies. If the government feels the system makes too much money in too fewer hands then force them to pay more tax.
I never use an Apple product and think, "I hate this product, but what choice do I have?" When it gets to that point, it's a monopoly. Right now, Apple customers seem quite happy.What is it that lead Apple to this point? Are they totally oblivious to what happened to monopolies in the past? Didn't any lawyers come in and point out when AT&T was busted up, or when movie studios lost their ability to operate theaters? Or does Apple think they have enough money that they can win in court against the federal government (or drag the fight out long enough for the outcome to not matter?)
Does Apple realize that their brand is possibily their single greatest asset, and they've been steadily increasing the pace that they're dragging it through the mud?
Epic's product didn't just fall from the sky. (heh)Because people who have worked for things generally side with people who have done the same. Epic can't say that. Apple can.
Nobody on this platform gives a **** about rights. Their short-sighted pragmatism is incredibly contemptible.This is just crazy! Mr. Cook, STEP IT UP. View attachment 947857
No. It fell from China.Epic's product didn't just fall from the sky. (heh)
Apple should leave COMMUNIST USA.Government intervention usually makes things worst.