EricNau said:I wouldn't be surprised if Apple was the first to adopt Blu Ray as a standard feature. In the past, Apple was the first to adopt the 3.5" Floppy as standard, (also the first to get rid of it), and the first to offer CD-ROM as a standard feature. I also believe they were the first to offer affordable DVD burners (superdrives).
BRLawyer said:I disagree. Granted, Apple was first in mass-adopting technologies that reflected a clear successful/evolving path; this was the case with 3.5" (over 5 1/4"), with CD-ROM (ditto), with GUI and HyperCard-like apps, with USB and (dare I say it) Firewire...
But BR still moves on muddy ground because of the struggle with HD-DVD; it would be premature for Apple to move straight to BR before further definition is given by the market in 2006; and I am sure the company doesn't want a new form of Betamax failure in its new desktops...trust me.
As for CES itself, it has never been Apple's venue; as far as the PC industry is concerned, it represents just a showcase for inferior products and the newest Dull offers or Alienware monstrous/ugly cases...nothing else.
Apple is way above that, and MWSF is gonna show us the real truth about leading-edge portables and trends, not Bill Gates and his crash-prone keynotes.
Lacero said:The logical step up from 30 inches would be 42 inches. I should know.
Platform said:I want a Blue-Ray external FW drive![]()
Peace said:Apple sits on the BR board tho..
~Shard~ said:Because you can't afford a 42" LCD?![]()
![]()
![]()
maya said:Actually he is right Shard, LCD technology past the 40" mark gets very very expensive. Anything below is affordable.
Plan on seeing some form of 30"+ and sub 40" screen released or maybe not.
My guess: 32" 35" or a 37" ACD.
Plasma displays are affordable at 0"-50" after that they tend to hit the steep prices. Though as of recent this is changing.![]()
~Shard~ said:I know, I was just joking - see the![]()
and
in my post? Just having some fun...
I agree, if Apple did release a larger LCD I think another 30-something inch display would make the most sense rather than jumping to a gigantic 40-something inch display.![]()
maya said:I don't think Dual Link DVI even has the bandwidth for a 40" LCD.![]()
![]()
~Shard~ said:Agreed - I don't know of any technology which would allow for this right now, but someone please correct me if I am wrong....
Peace said:
Peace said:Apple sits on the BR board tho..
That's why I said logical and not reasonable. You will find it illogical if you try to decode my logic, as I have none.boombashi said:Why should you know, and why do I have a 37" LCD TV?![]()