AS I SAID......
Weakspot theory shows Bendgates not quite dead yet
Luke Dormehl (11:26 am PDT, Sep 26th)
http://www.cultofmac.com/297938/weakspot-theory-shows-bendgates-quite-dead-yet/
As alleras4 writes:
Its not about how much force must be applied and if a pocket will do the trick or not. Its just that under a particular type of flexing, the phone is prone to bend mainly because a metal insert meant to reinforce instead spins in an axis too close to the critical point. If they were further apart allowing better support to counter the flexing and not [spinning], it would make it more resistant.
The idea explains why Apples stress-testing techniques failed to discover the alleged fault, since unlike Unbox Therapys manual approach to bending, Apple applied equal force across the phones entire profile, rather than one side which was what was necessary to start the bending process.
Been telling you monkeys that LAB TESTING typically only covers a SMALL PART of real world stress
Weakspot theory shows Bendgates not quite dead yet
Luke Dormehl (11:26 am PDT, Sep 26th)
http://www.cultofmac.com/297938/weakspot-theory-shows-bendgates-quite-dead-yet/
As alleras4 writes:
Its not about how much force must be applied and if a pocket will do the trick or not. Its just that under a particular type of flexing, the phone is prone to bend mainly because a metal insert meant to reinforce instead spins in an axis too close to the critical point. If they were further apart allowing better support to counter the flexing and not [spinning], it would make it more resistant.
The idea explains why Apples stress-testing techniques failed to discover the alleged fault, since unlike Unbox Therapys manual approach to bending, Apple applied equal force across the phones entire profile, rather than one side which was what was necessary to start the bending process.


Been telling you monkeys that LAB TESTING typically only covers a SMALL PART of real world stress