Plain physics never lie
You gonna keep posting your etch-a-sketch drawing until someone comments on it? LOL.
Plain physics never lie
Here's a summary of the design flaw as I see it:
Here is the weak point as viewed externally.
View attachment 497845
From iFixit's teardown, here are the internal reenforcements.
View attachment 497846
Note that Apple chose to use a series of short steel plates in lieu of a single continuous steel plate. Had they chose the latter, the phone would not have pivot points at the ends of each plate. The meager reenforcements are "good enough," save a few cents, and make for a slightly lighter phone. A continuous steel angle or I-beam could have been used without altering the size of the phone and would have resulted in a virtually unbendable device. They probably used a formula to predict the cost of iPhone replacements vs. increased manufacturing costs, yet Apple's reputation was not factored in. It's a typical American business mistake - even Apple is not immune.
As a result of Apple's flawed design (under a test that doesn't even exploit the weak discontinuity at the volume buttons), the competition is about 150% more resistant to bending:
View attachment 497847
In only a few days, we already have 9-10 reported iPhone bends. Stress is additive for aluminum, so with time phones will grow more prone to bending. Figure that for several years, each person with a bent iPhone will show it to everyone he knows, and factor in the social media amplification, and the result is irrepairable harm to Apple's reputation as a maker of high end quality products.
The diminished reputation occures with people see others with bent phones. Whether it is "stupid" to carry a phone in one's pocket is irrelevant, since all that matters is what other people see. Take a cashier who sees mobile phones all day long: if he sees more bent iPhones, he'll reach a conclusion. This is why a rigid phone is so important to Apple's reputation. Surely any Apple defender wants Apple to do well - I know I do as a longtime Mac user.
Absolutely.Here's a summary of the design flaw as I see it:
Here is the weak point as viewed externally.
View attachment 497845
From iFixit's teardown, here are the internal reenforcements.
View attachment 497846
Note that Apple chose to use a series of short steel plates in lieu of a single continuous steel plate. Had they chose the latter, the phone would not have pivot points at the ends of each plate. The meager reenforcements are "good enough," save a few cents, and make for a slightly lighter phone. A continuous steel angle or I-beam could have been used without altering the size of the phone and would have resulted in a virtually unbendable device. They probably used a formula to predict the cost of iPhone replacements vs. increased manufacturing costs, yet Apple's reputation was not factored in. It's a typical American business mistake - even Apple is not immune.
As a result of Apple's flawed design (under a test that doesn't even exploit the weak discontinuity at the volume buttons), the competition is about 150% more resistant to bending:
View attachment 497847
In only a few days, we already have 9-10 reported iPhone bends. Stress is additive for aluminum, so with time phones will grow more prone to bending. Figure that for several years, each person with a bent iPhone will show it to everyone he knows, and factor in the social media amplification, and the result is irrepairable harm to Apple's reputation as a maker of high end quality products.
The diminished reputation occures with people see others with bent phones. Whether it is "stupid" to carry a phone in one's pocket is irrelevant, since all that matters is what other people see. Take a cashier who sees mobile phones all day long: if he sees more bent iPhones, he'll reach a conclusion. This is why a rigid phone is so important to Apple's reputation. Surely any Apple defender wants Apple to do well - I know I do as a longtime Mac user.
So what's the consensus when putting it in your pocket? Display or back of the phone facing your body? I'd say display.
You gonna keep posting your etch-a-sketch drawing until someone comments on it? LOL.
I think I met that guy at the fair.
----------
I've always put the display facing my body.
all of you, including the apple fanboys and especially android fans, need to get a effing life, how the hell do you guys devote this much time n effort to this. And yes everything in my house is apple other than a old laptop. You all make it personal like it's your gf cheating on you or someone called her a whale.
You dumb ****s, you can still bend your phone considering how much you weight and depends on the object you are applying force on. I bent my iPhone 6 and I weight 185 lbs and 5'-11". Considering my ass taking half my weight with normal jeans, that's 92.5 lbs of force. Now consider an average adult weights about 140 lbs to 210 lbs..
I assume you can't see it here too (he posted pictures too)? https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/19935054/
![]()
You dumb ****s, you can still bend your phone considering how much you weight and depends on the object you are applying force on. I bent my iPhone 6 and I weight 185 lbs and 5'-11". Considering my ass taking half my weight with normal jeans, that's 92.5 lbs of force. Now consider an average adult weights about 140 lbs to 210 lbs..
wao 40/60lb of force less than the iPhone 5. They went from 130 to 90/70
Almost half the strength in the 6.
Here here. Often ashamed to 'be seen' with Apple stuff these days. Guilty by association.
No need for you to try and carry the weight of dysfunctional thinking of other people. You don't have to answer to anyone but yourself, your family, and God.
Don't embrace logical fallacy.
Actually, sitting on the phone in pants is akin to applying a UDL. Mostly, across the span of an object, it's response to load is linear and you get a "linear" reaction......except in the case of the iphone which has this local weakness the the stress concentration is higher at the point in discussion, the reaction of the loading becomes non linear and you get a permanent deformation.Your physics is weigh off. Caught the pun
Half your weight isn't applied to your butt every time you sit and not everyone is evenly distributed like that.
Also your butt spreads out and displaced your weight over a wide area which means less weight on the actual phone
Lastly your butt is soft even if you're a skinny hipster. So the phones rigidity is pushing back on your butt.
Again. This is all moot because people are just making things up now.
all of you, including the apple fanboys and especially android fans, need to get a effing life, how the hell do you guys devote this much time n effort to this. And yes everything in my house is apple other than a old laptop. You all make it personal like it's your gf cheating on you or someone called her a whale.
I am not replacing a second phone. I am replacing a phone that has been bent twice.. The second time was not as bad as the first, I was at work and didn't have a second phone to take a pic with..
None of this ruins the best experience i ever had on a smartphone overal with these new iPhones, amazing to hold and have incredible hardware in them and the screens are cream of the crop
I wonder if the glass facing out or in while in your back pocket makes any difference.
None of this ruins the best experience i ever had on a smartphone overal with these new iPhones, amazing to hold and have incredible hardware in them and the screens are cream of the crop
Ya, don't let a few ruin it for you. Same thing happened with the 4 and the antenna, the 5 bending, etc. I usually dont make big purchase decisions based on forums or poorly done YouTube videos. This isn't the rule, just mostly exceptions...