Your talking nonsense man! You need at least two femiendermic staters to prevent the upended score motion! Where were you taught this rubbish?!
ROFL someone gets my humor
Your talking nonsense man! You need at least two femiendermic staters to prevent the upended score motion! Where were you taught this rubbish?!
Damn you, I think you might be correct!
Well quite, if you'd listened to the other gentlemen the transaxis capitulation syncing would have been off by at least a factor of 0.567
And the crazy thing is this last page has more sense in it than a lot of the others.
And the crazy thing is this last page has more sense in it than a lot of the others.
Next time please quote me completely.
The YouTube Video's guy just tried to prove that he can bend the phone with his hands. The article tries to explain why there might be a "weak spot" near the volume buttons..
You, sir, have a gift and I thank you for your making this thread worth reading.What people dont understand is that the iPhone 6 uses only four non reversible tremupipes for side buffering and the lack of a differential girdle spring was a huge mistake. Sinusodial smart phones with an integrated gram meter have proven to withstand 4th dimensional stresses than a standard lotis-ol-deltoild winding design, but that is another discussion. In the end and to utilize the current iPhone 6 design, Apple must integrate panendermic staters to prevent upended score motion.
Next time please quote me completely. Thanks. Here for you again.
The YouTube Video's guy just tried to prove that he can bend the phone with his hands. The article tries to explain why there might be a "weak spot" near the volume buttons, where the iPhone in the video cracked and where, by the way, it seems other iPhones are also vulnerable of bending/bent (like here e.g.: Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQxX_x3HTXQ + pictures https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/19935054/) How is that the exact same thing? ...
Furthermore, the Apple and CR tests didn't "show" that bending is not an issue under "normal use", they did just prove that if you apply force evenly distributed in the middle with a machine, and not in a real life scenario under different circumstances, it will deform at a certain point (CR test 70/90lbs).
What these tests are not showing is what happens if you concentrate the force near that assumed "weak spot". So the article I quoted claims in a hypothesis that its easier to bend there because the inserted metal reinforcement is too short.
And since the Apple and CR tests do not prove anything in this regard, but there is a corresponding hypothesis, this hypothesis is very well very interesting. Again, can you disprove it?
Never had a issue with my iPhone 4 and my 4.7 inch 6 feels very solid and sturdy in hand, no bend at all and i had it for a week, not worried about that **** ...
Read this and explain me why this hypothesis is wrong.guy, you have a serious problem in dealing with reality.
Strenght and flexibility tests are performed in a standardized way to simulate or even outcome normal load stress.
They are performed with point of pressure locate so to maximize the effect (at the center while holding the device at the edges) this is not a distributed load across the length.
At the opposite video tests can be performed in every way (in more takes, editing the video, putting unknown pressure, and so on... )
You are free to choose any phone you like but don't mislead others with prejudices and errors, it's a very annoying and unfriendly behavior.
Thus said, I wish I could buy an iphone 6 plus or something like that. For now I have other kinds of problems.
It is really funny to see how much passion people puts even in trolling.
Mate, seriously, give me a break. Your phone didn't bend by itself in "normal usage". You most probably inadvertently sat on it and don't remember....
It's like dating a model and complaining that she's a crap wrestler.
Yeah, as pointed out already I think, this guy's MacRumors and Twitter account both created today.
Seems to be a common theme with these adamant "loyal Apple fans" and their bending issues...![]()
This is what you said: "Its not about the video guy, but about this..."
When in fact it's the exact same thing, with an attempt at an explanation, still speculatively since no additional tests are done. It's an analysis of that very YouTube clip.
How do you know that it does, that's not the point. YouTube guy demonstrates that it's possible to bend an iPhone with your hands given enough force (true for many small electronic devices). CR and Apple shows that it's likely not going to be an issue under normal use.
Either it is legit or it isn't, it can't be legit "to you". The details are speculations on what may well have happened, but it's not that interesting because no tests are involved at all, so it's one guys theory.
I've caught this guy lying!
There's no way that phone would have a bend in that corner from the situation he showed us on the video.
It's all in the physics...
How does the CR test show it will not be an issue under normal use? I haven't seen anyone do a normal use test except the few people who had the phone bend in their pockets. Time is the only thing that is going to show if this is a problem.
How does the CR test show it will not be an issue under normal use?
Below you can see the pictures of the smart phone carnage, but bear in mind that it took significant force to do this kind of damage to all these phones. While nothing is (evidently) indestructible, we expect that any of these phones should stand up to typical use.
Our experts put thousands of products to the test each year in our 50 state-of-the-art labs and 327-acre automotive testing track...
Across everything we do, Consumer Reports unites impartial, trustworthy guidance with nearly eight decades of unwavering commitment to helping consumers make informed decisions.
Yup. I've read some idiotic threads here in the last couple of years, but this one is by far the most asinine. A thin, aluminum electronic device bends when you force it. Yeah, and???... Who's really surprised? I said it on another thread and I'll say it here; people need to take some responsibility for their gear. It bends because it's thin and light. And being thin and light is the intended design. You can't have it both ways (at least not with current materials). It's like dating a model and complaining that she's a crap wrestler... If you **** up your phone, too bad. It's nobody's fault but your own. And if you really need round-the-clock protection from your own ignorance and irresponsibility, then lock yourself in your room, get your mom to bring you meals, and when she dies, hire a nanny... Totally pathetic.
It's the conclusion of their test.
(From their about page)
How does the CR test show it will not be an issue under normal use? I haven't seen anyone do a normal use test except the few people who had the phone bend in their pockets. Time is the only thing that is going to show if this is a problem.
----------
You haven't caught him doing anything. You just keep accusing him of lying and refuting everything he posts. He provided evidence.