I don't understand the backlash against Consumer Reports. Did someone think they wouldn't test the Verizon iPhone? Or that they would just keep their mouth closed if they found the same faults?
Do you LIKE that the design of the iPhone 4 has places where touching it can reduce an otherwise usable signal to unusable?
It isn't like CR is the only place that has claimed the antenna design is dumb -- pretty much everyone, except Apple, has agreed at some point that it can be an issue. Remember the youtube videos that initially brought the issue to light?
I like the iPhone 4 just as much as the next iPhone fan, but it seems like a dumb design and I hope the iPhone 5 does away with it. The whole point of Consumer Reports is that they test equipment from an unbiased point of view and they don't consider marketing hype when they review products. Do some research on the non-profit before you blast them.
I think the fact that the iPhone 4 (AT&T) was the highest RANKED phone but was not recommended makes perfect sense... it is a great piece of equipment with a big problem. It's a phone. If you think MOST iPhone users use their phone as a phone 2% of the time, you haven't met my friends, mom, aunt, etc. etc. etc. who like their apps, but use the phone CONSTANTLY -- as a phone.
Consumer Reports may have lost something in some of your eyes -- but I doubt you are subscribers, and I doubt they care. For people who subscribe and rely on their ratings, this is another example of them basing recommendations on their test results.
Um, if this is a big enough issue to NOT recommend buying, as in, they consider it a deal breaker, then it makes absolutely ZERO sense to rank it at the top.
I literally have no clue why the hell you think that makes any sense at all.
"This is the best phone in the world! But DO NOT BUY!"