Apple makes 37% gross margin, an absolute pittance compared to many of the products you use every day and never complain about.
That's overall. Don't they still make over 50% gross on iPhones?
Apple makes 37% gross margin, an absolute pittance compared to many of the products you use every day and never complain about.
All glass breaks. Sapphire won't be any different.
Pepsi: Our cola is better!
Coke: No! Ours is way way better!
Pepsi: Is not.
Coke: Is too!
You know Samsung is rushing to figure out how to slap a slab of sapphire on one of their devices now.
Coming this summer: Samsung Gear(tm) Sapphire
----------
Oh crap, I'm late for a meeting. I lost track of time since I can barely see the watch hands through my dim sapphire watch crystal.
Is this an English sentence?
And yet it breaks more than Gorilla Glass?
Hmm... Credibility prob, bro.
While Apple is figuring out how to slap a Samsung display for cheap on their devices.
Ya know, in my years of using mobile devices, seeing them in the field, and so on, SCRATCHES are not even close to being a common problem.
CRACKING is. We need glass that is resistant to shock and won't spiderweb when dropped. Current smart phone and tablet screens are already fairly resistant to scratches; I don't use a screen protector on my iPhone and I certainly don't baby it yet there are no easily visible scratches.
QUOTE]
this is not even remotely true.
for iphones, maybe, as far as the entire smartphone market.. not at all.. most other devices scratch like hell and look terrible. i am a technician for a wireless company and SOO many parts are unusable due to surface scratches...
Actually he makes some good points mixed with some fiction.
And many people think gorilla glass is made to be strong when in truth it's only made to be scratch resistant
Incorrect. It is made to be strong as well. It is not yet strong enough to reliably not crack when dropped but it is definitely made to be strong.
...
this is not even remotely true.
for iphones, maybe, as far as the entire smartphone market.. not at all.. most other devices scratch like hell and look terrible. i am a technician for a wireless company and SOO many parts are unusable due to surface scratches...
Why would I want something so useless? My phone either sits in my pocket or on top of my desk. Neither place has any solar charging capacity whatsoever.
Are you Apple profit critics just haters or really that stupid? Have you ever seen the Gross Margins of the following products?
Cigarettes, beer, watches, jewelry, auto parts, fashion accessories, razor blades etc.
Apple makes 37% gross margin, an absolute pittance compared to many of the products you use every day and never complain about.
A company bashing a competing product? No way
Is this an English sentence?
And yet it breaks more than Gorilla Glass?
Hmm... Credibility prob, bro.
You mean like Aluminium over Plastic?
Slower and more expensive to make
End result is a product that is less strong and more prone to damage
But hey, it looks cool
Apple hasn't used Samsung displays in the iPhone since the 4S.
Sapphire is not scratch proof.Breakable ?Code:
---------
Sapphire : ✓
Corning GG : ✓
Scratch Proof ?Code:
----------------
Sapphire : ✓
Corning GG : X
Sapphire wins. End of story.
Also with re-usable crucible sapphire cost will come down significantly.
Go![]()
Yeah, Deep Blue, Rolex, Tag, Breitling include it in their watches because; it is so hard to see the display through it, it is so fragile (Deep Blue Watches are all professional dive, some rated to a 1,500 m or 5,000 feet), and it scratches easily. You have a nice product Corning, but Sapphire is measurably better in several ways. Especially hardness and scratch resistance : Vickers Hardness 2200 versus 649 according to Corning's data sheet, (or 9 versus about 6 on Mohs Scale - not a linear scale).
No contest. But of course you are going to desperately try to steer the billion-unit smart device industry away from any competition - a shift to sapphire could truly be a crushing blow.