Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You are quoting me, as I was quoting to an article. Dunno why you are replying to this and in that manner. I never mentioned anything to warrant such a reply from you.

Crowdstrike is not part of windows and is not distributed via windows an widows update.
Microsoft allows Crowdstrike to run on Windows. I guess they should do a better job of vetting "cyber security" companies, shouldn't they?
 
Mac people here ridiculing Windows apparently don't realize it's not a Windows problem, it's a Crowdstrike problem.
The fact that Mac computers aren't affected is by the grace of Crowdstrike, not Apple.

Go on now! Off your high-horse.
Even here the same user continues to disagree with the comments probably because his/her mission is to blame Microsoft...
 
Microsoft allows Crowdstrike to run on Windows. I guess they should do a better job of vetting "cyber security" companies, shouldn't they?

I can run anything and everything I want on my Mac; Apple gets no say-so. Same for Windows and Microsoft.

Our pharmacy automation systems don't use crowdstrike, yet all run Windows, and they are working fine.
 
This. All of you saying "it's not Microsofts fault!" are missing the point entirely.

If Windows allows kernal access to 3rd party apps that have the ability to shut down your entire system with a single automated update, that's on Microsoft. Period. Full stop.

Others have mentioned that Crowdstrike works on Macs too; but can Crowdstrike access the core of the Mac OS in this same way? I can't ever remember a 3rd party app that brought down my entire Mac.

...and for those of you saying that the DMA and the EU can't have this affect...this is at the heart of why I oppose the DMA. The EU is putting their fingers into the core of OS operations.
There is a reason Mac OS is not used as the backbone of the worlds IT infrastructure.

It’s a consumer, prosumer OS.

Your Mac isn’t doing half the stuff in the background that most corporate systems are doing.
 
Microsoft allows Crowdstrike to run on Windows. I guess they should do a better job of vetting "cyber security" companies, shouldn't they?
Crowdstrike is one of the leading security vendors. There is a reason that this issue is affecting so many organizations. Until today, it was consider one of the best ones out there.

At our organization, we used Crowdstrike until earlier this year, but changed over to Microsoft Defender because it was included in our Microsoft licensing.

Apple has pushed out patches that break people in the past as well. A recent macOS update forced a bunch of computers to boot to Recovery and require end users to enter a recovery key. Or, a macOS update that failed when a computer had their display settings set to disable ProRes.

No one company is ever immune to issues. Even with the best testing, sh*t happens.

For the record, I am not defending Crowdstrike in this case, nor even Microsoft. However, it would good to educate yourself on how the Enterprise world works before you just decide to bash Microsoft.
 
There is a reason Mac OS is not used as the backbone of the worlds IT infrastructure.

It’s a consumer, prosumer OS.

Your Mac isn’t doing half the stuff in the background that most corporate systems are doing.
I didn't say anything about MacOS being used in enterprise.
 
Haha, spare me. I work in software and I have Crowdstrike on my work machine. I know this didn't happen via a Windows update. Also, I guarantee I am more highly educated than 90% of the people on this forum. But, thanks for the "direction". 🙄
You're the one that posted that it came through a Windows Update. Now, you are back tracking.
 
For the record, I am not defending Crowdstrike in this case, nor even Microsoft. However, it would good to educate yourself on how the Enterprise world works before you just decide to bash Microsoft.
If such a large portion of the Enterprise world can be brought down with a single auto-update from a single 3rd party software, that's a problem. And that problem rests on the shoulders of those who have built a system that is vulnerable in this way.
 
I didn't say anything about MacOS being used in enterprise.
Mac OS is clearly not used on the Enterprise. James Tiberius Kirk would never have left space dock after seeing the Apple Logo boot screen on the bridge. It was a Linux distribution for sure.
 
If such a large portion of the Enterprise world can be brought down with a single auto-update from a single 3rd party software, that's a problem. And that problem rests on the shoulders of those who have built a system that is vulnerable in this way.
The same could be said about the rush into AI… and the consequences could be far far worse than a boot loop 😂
 
My point is, companies decide what to run, not Microsoft.

Here is my source, download anything you want on a Windows machine and run it. It might complain, but will let you. Stop being obtuse.
Okay good deal. So, I want you to run iMessage on your Windows PC, directly. No workarounds. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, you can admit that you are wrong and we can move along.
 
Okay good deal. So, I want you to run iMessage on your Windows PC, directly. No workarounds. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, you can admit that you are wrong and we can move along.

Absolutely not. Apple decides I can't run it, because they actively prevent it. If had the source to compile it, I could and it would work.

If a company builds a program that I want to run, on my machine, and Microsoft doesn't like it, it will still run, because I can decide. If someone builds a Mac app that I want to run on my Air, but Apple doesn't like it and doesn't approve of it, I can still run it.

I'm done with your nonsense. Hope you have a good day.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.